Gordi Toufigh, Lepist Eve Irene
Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Toxicol Lett. 2004 Mar 1;147(2):99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.009.
A discrepancy seems to prevail with regard to the toxicity and safety of the artemisinin family of antimalarials. While these compounds have been found to be virtually void of any serious side effects in humans, their neurotoxicity in animal models has raised concerns about their use. In this paper, we present selected examples of both pre-clinical and clinical studies dealing with adverse effects of artemisinin drugs. We suggest that the prolonged presence of artemisinins upon slow release from oil-based intramuscular formulations is the main cause of the observed toxicity in laboratory animals. In contrast, oral intake of these compounds, which is by far the most common formulation used for treatment of malaria patients, results in rapid clearance of these drugs and is thus unlikely to cause any toxicity in human subjects. Another plausible factor may be the relatively high doses of artemisinin compounds used in animal studies. In conclusion, the observation of the toxicity of artemisinin compounds in animals, but not in humans, is most likely due to different pharmacokinetic profiles after different routes of administrations.
青蒿素类抗疟药的毒性和安全性方面似乎存在差异。虽然已发现这些化合物在人体中几乎没有任何严重副作用,但它们在动物模型中的神经毒性引发了对其使用的担忧。在本文中,我们展示了一些临床前和临床研究的实例,这些研究涉及青蒿素药物的不良反应。我们认为,油基肌肉注射制剂缓慢释放后青蒿素的长期存在是实验动物中观察到的毒性的主要原因。相比之下,口服这些化合物(这是迄今为止治疗疟疾患者最常用的制剂)会导致这些药物迅速清除,因此不太可能在人体中引起任何毒性。另一个可能的因素可能是动物研究中使用的青蒿素化合物剂量相对较高。总之,青蒿素化合物在动物而非人体中观察到毒性,很可能是由于不同给药途径后的药代动力学特征不同。