Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2):419-423.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.056.
Epinephrine auto-injectors provide life-saving prehospital treatment for individuals experiencing anaphylaxis in community settings.
To determine the number, demographics, and associated circumstances and outcomes of unintentional injections from epinephrine auto-injectors.
We searched the databases of the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Food and Drug Administration's Safety Information and Adverse Event Report System for these incidents as reported by members of the public and by health care professionals.
From 1994 to 2007, a total of 15,190 unintentional injections from epinephrine auto-injectors were reported to US Poison Control Centers, 60% of them from 2003 to 2007. Those unintentionally injected had a median age of 14 years (interquartile range, 8-35), 55% were female, and 85% were injected in a home or other residence. Management was documented in only 4101 cases (27%), of whom 53% were observed without intervention, 29% were treated, 13% were neither held for observation nor treated, and 4% refused treatment. In contrast, from 1969 to 2007, only 105 unintentional injections from epinephrine auto-injectors were reported to MedWatch. Forty percent of these occurred during attempts to treat allergic reactions. Injuries resulting in permanent sequelae were rarely reported to either US Poison Control Centers or to MedWatch.
The number of reported unintentional injections from epinephrine auto-injectors increased annually from 1994 to 2007. To prevent these unintentional injections, improved epinephrine auto-injector design is needed, along with increased vigilance in training the trainers and in training and coaching the users, as well as efforts to increase public awareness of the role of epinephrine auto-injectors in the first-aid treatment of anaphylaxis in the community.
肾上腺素自动注射器可在社区环境中为出现过敏反应的个体提供救命的院前治疗。
确定肾上腺素自动注射器意外注射的数量、人群统计学特征以及相关情况和结果。
我们在美国中毒控制中心协会和食品药品管理局的安全信息和不良事件报告系统数据库中搜索了这些事件,这些事件是由公众和医疗保健专业人员报告的。
1994 年至 2007 年,美国中毒控制中心共收到 15190 例肾上腺素自动注射器意外注射报告,其中 60%发生在 2003 年至 2007 年。这些意外注射者的中位年龄为 14 岁(四分位间距,8-35),55%为女性,85%发生在家庭或其他住所。仅在 4101 例(27%)病例中记录了处理情况,其中 53%未进行干预观察,29%接受了治疗,13%既未观察也未治疗,4%拒绝治疗。相比之下,1969 年至 2007 年,仅向 MedWatch 报告了 105 例肾上腺素自动注射器意外注射。其中 40%发生在试图治疗过敏反应时。无论是美国中毒控制中心还是 MedWatch,均很少报告导致永久性后遗症的伤害。
1994 年至 2007 年,报告的肾上腺素自动注射器意外注射数量逐年增加。为了预防这些意外注射,需要改进肾上腺素自动注射器的设计,同时在培训培训者、培训和指导使用者方面提高警惕,并努力提高公众对肾上腺素自动注射器在社区中治疗过敏反应急救作用的认识。