• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度抑郁症对人格和人格障碍评估的影响。

State effects of major depression on the assessment of personality and personality disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M, College Station, TX 77843-4235, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2010 May;167(5):528-35. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09071023. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09071023
PMID:20160004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4628285/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to determine whether personality disorders diagnosed during a depressive episode have long-term outcomes more typical of those of other patients with personality disorders or those of patients with noncomorbid major depression.

METHOD

The authors used 6-year outcome data collected from the multisite Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS). Diagnoses and personality measures gathered from the study cohort at the index assessment using interview and self-report methods were associated with symptomatic, functional, and personality measures at 6-year follow-up. Of 668 patients initially recruited to the CLPS, 522 were followed for 6 years. All participants had either a DSM-IV diagnosis of one of four personality disorders (borderline, schizotypal, obsessive-compulsive, or avoidant) or a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder with no accompanying personality disorder.

RESULTS

Six-year outcomes for patients with comorbid personality disorder and major depressive disorder at the index evaluation were similar to those of patients with pure personality disorder and significantly worse than those of patients with pure major depressive disorder. Stability estimates of personality traits were similar for personality disorder patients with and without major depressive disorder at the index evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that personality disorder diagnoses established during depressive episodes are a valid reflection of personality pathology rather than an artifact of depressive mood.

摘要

目的

作者旨在确定在抑郁发作期间诊断出的人格障碍是否具有与其他人格障碍患者或无共病的重度抑郁症患者更相似的长期结局。

方法

作者使用多地点合作纵向人格障碍研究(CLPS)收集的 6 年随访数据。使用访谈和自我报告方法在指数评估时从研究队列中收集的诊断和人格测量结果与 6 年随访时的症状、功能和人格测量结果相关联。在最初被 CLPS 招募的 668 名患者中,有 522 名进行了 6 年的随访。所有参与者均符合 DSM-IV 诊断标准,患有四种人格障碍之一(边缘型、分裂型、强迫型或回避型)或 DSM-IV 诊断标准的重度抑郁症,无伴随的人格障碍。

结果

在指数评估时同时患有共病人格障碍和重度抑郁症的患者的 6 年结局与单纯人格障碍患者相似,明显比单纯重度抑郁症患者差。在指数评估时患有和不患有重度抑郁症的人格障碍患者的人格特质稳定性估计相似。

结论

这些结果表明,在抑郁发作期间确定的人格障碍诊断是人格病理学的有效反映,而不是抑郁情绪的人为产物。

相似文献

1
State effects of major depression on the assessment of personality and personality disorder.重度抑郁症对人格和人格障碍评估的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 May;167(5):528-35. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09071023. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
2
Co-occurrence of mood and personality disorders: a report from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS).
Depress Anxiety. 1999;10(4):175-82.
3
Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.分裂型、边缘型、回避型或强迫型人格障碍患者的功能损害。
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;159(2):276-83. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.276.
4
Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: toward a hybrid model of axis II disorders.分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的个体DSM-IV标准的两年患病率及稳定性:迈向轴II障碍的混合模型
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):883-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.883.
5
Categorical and dimensional stability of comorbid personality disorder symptoms in DSM-IV major depressive disorder: a prospective study.DSM-IV 重性抑郁障碍共病人格障碍症状的类别和维度稳定性:一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):287-95. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04621blu. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
6
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
7
Distinguishing bipolar II depression from major depressive disorder with comorbid borderline personality disorder: demographic, clinical, and family history differences.双相 II 型抑郁症与共病边缘型人格障碍的重度抑郁症的鉴别:人口学、临床和家族史差异。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;74(9):880-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08428.
8
Dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: relationships to functional impairment.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的维度表征:与功能损害的关系
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;162(10):1919-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1919.
9
Ten-year stability and latent structure of the DSM-IV schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的十年稳定性及潜在结构
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Aug;118(3):507-19. doi: 10.1037/a0016478.
10
Short-term diagnostic stability of schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.分裂型、边缘型、回避型和强迫型人格障碍的短期诊断稳定性。
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;159(12):2036-41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.12.2036.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Big Five personality traits associated with trajectories of depressive symptom among middle-aged and older adults in China?中国中老年人群的大五人格特质与抑郁症状轨迹有关吗?
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02923-2.
2
Level of personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits in relation to depression and anxiety symptoms in middle and older adults.中老年人的人格功能水平和适应不良人格特质与抑郁和焦虑症状的关系
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96067-7.
3
How changes in depression severity and borderline personality disorder intensity are linked - a cohort study of depressed patients with and without borderline personality disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten-year stability and latent structure of the DSM-IV schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的十年稳定性及潜在结构
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Aug;118(3):507-19. doi: 10.1037/a0016478.
2
Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders.人格障碍替代模型的比较。
Psychol Med. 2007 Jul;37(7):983-94. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706009482. Epub 2006 Nov 23.
3
Personality and major depression: a Swedish longitudinal, population-based twin study.
抑郁严重程度的变化与边缘性人格障碍强度如何相关——一项针对伴有和不伴有边缘性人格障碍的抑郁症患者的队列研究。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2024 Feb 19;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40479-024-00247-2.
4
Societal costs of personality disorders among treatment-seeking patients in Norway: the relative contribution of specific DSM-5 categories.挪威寻求治疗的患者中人格障碍的社会成本:DSM-5 特定类别相对贡献。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Feb;274(1):139-149. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01655-1. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
5
Personality changes with subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression.扣带回下深部脑刺激治疗难治性抑郁症患者的人格改变。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021 Aug 10;46(4):E490-E499. doi: 10.1503/jpn.210028. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
Personality Traits and Psychopathology Over the Course of Six Months of Outpatient Psychotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study.门诊心理治疗六个月过程中的人格特质与精神病理学:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 7;11:174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00174. eCollection 2020.
7
Co-Morbidity of Personality Disorder in Major Depressive Disorder Among Psychiatric Outpatients in China: A Further Analysis of an Epidemiologic Survey in a Clinical Population.中国精神科门诊重性抑郁障碍患者中人格障碍的共病情况:临床人群流行病学调查的进一步分析
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 12;10:833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00833. eCollection 2019.
8
Characterizing DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder features in psychiatric inpatients at scale using electronic health records.采用电子健康记录大规模描述精神科住院患者的 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格障碍特征。
Psychol Med. 2020 Oct;50(13):2221-2229. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002320. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
9
Degree of Correspondence Between Retrospective and Proximal Reports of Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms, Symptom Triggers, and Emotions.边缘型人格障碍症状、症状触发因素及情绪的回顾性报告与近期报告之间的对应程度。
J Pers Disord. 2021 Feb;35(1):1-20. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_418. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
10
Personality, depression and anxiety in primary Sjogren's syndrome - Association with sociodemographic factors and comorbidity.原发性干燥综合征患者的人格、抑郁和焦虑状况——与社会人口学因素和共病的关联。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210466. eCollection 2019.
人格与重度抑郁症:一项基于瑞典人群的纵向双胞胎研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;63(10):1113-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.10.1113.
4
Personality disorder and the outcome of depression: meta-analysis of published studies.人格障碍与抑郁症的结局:已发表研究的荟萃分析
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;188:13-20. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.1.13.
5
Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: toward a hybrid model of axis II disorders.分裂型、边缘型、回避型及强迫型人格障碍的个体DSM-IV标准的两年患病率及稳定性:迈向轴II障碍的混合模型
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):883-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.883.
6
Two-year stability and change of schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders.分裂型、边缘型、回避型和强迫型人格障碍的两年稳定性与变化
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Oct;72(5):767-75. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.767.
7
Individual growth curve analysis illuminates stability and change in personality disorder features: the longitudinal study of personality disorders.个体成长曲线分析揭示人格障碍特征的稳定性与变化:人格障碍的纵向研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;61(10):1015-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.10.1015.
8
Major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder revisited: longitudinal interactions.再谈重度抑郁症与边缘型人格障碍:纵向相互作用
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;65(8):1049-56. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0804.
9
The effect of Axis II disorders on the outcome of treatment of anxiety and unipolar depressive disorders: a review.轴II障碍对焦虑症和单相抑郁症治疗结果的影响:一项综述。
J Pers Disord. 2003 Oct;17(5):387-405. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.5.387.22972.
10
Plausibility and possible determinants of sudden "remissions" in borderline patients.边缘型患者突然“缓解”的合理性及可能的决定因素。
Psychiatry. 2003 Summer;66(2):111-9. doi: 10.1521/psyc.66.2.111.20614.