Suppr超能文献

重度抑郁症对人格和人格障碍评估的影响。

State effects of major depression on the assessment of personality and personality disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M, College Station, TX 77843-4235, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2010 May;167(5):528-35. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09071023. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to determine whether personality disorders diagnosed during a depressive episode have long-term outcomes more typical of those of other patients with personality disorders or those of patients with noncomorbid major depression.

METHOD

The authors used 6-year outcome data collected from the multisite Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS). Diagnoses and personality measures gathered from the study cohort at the index assessment using interview and self-report methods were associated with symptomatic, functional, and personality measures at 6-year follow-up. Of 668 patients initially recruited to the CLPS, 522 were followed for 6 years. All participants had either a DSM-IV diagnosis of one of four personality disorders (borderline, schizotypal, obsessive-compulsive, or avoidant) or a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder with no accompanying personality disorder.

RESULTS

Six-year outcomes for patients with comorbid personality disorder and major depressive disorder at the index evaluation were similar to those of patients with pure personality disorder and significantly worse than those of patients with pure major depressive disorder. Stability estimates of personality traits were similar for personality disorder patients with and without major depressive disorder at the index evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that personality disorder diagnoses established during depressive episodes are a valid reflection of personality pathology rather than an artifact of depressive mood.

摘要

目的

作者旨在确定在抑郁发作期间诊断出的人格障碍是否具有与其他人格障碍患者或无共病的重度抑郁症患者更相似的长期结局。

方法

作者使用多地点合作纵向人格障碍研究(CLPS)收集的 6 年随访数据。使用访谈和自我报告方法在指数评估时从研究队列中收集的诊断和人格测量结果与 6 年随访时的症状、功能和人格测量结果相关联。在最初被 CLPS 招募的 668 名患者中,有 522 名进行了 6 年的随访。所有参与者均符合 DSM-IV 诊断标准,患有四种人格障碍之一(边缘型、分裂型、强迫型或回避型)或 DSM-IV 诊断标准的重度抑郁症,无伴随的人格障碍。

结果

在指数评估时同时患有共病人格障碍和重度抑郁症的患者的 6 年结局与单纯人格障碍患者相似,明显比单纯重度抑郁症患者差。在指数评估时患有和不患有重度抑郁症的人格障碍患者的人格特质稳定性估计相似。

结论

这些结果表明,在抑郁发作期间确定的人格障碍诊断是人格病理学的有效反映,而不是抑郁情绪的人为产物。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders.人格障碍替代模型的比较。
Psychol Med. 2007 Jul;37(7):983-94. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706009482. Epub 2006 Nov 23.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验