Dennerlein Jack T, Ronk Christopher J, Perry Melissa J
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
Saf Sci. 2009 May 1;47(5):636-639. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.08.003.
Many causes for falls from ladders in construction are related to the user's activities; however, the extent to which users comply with ladder use best practices is unknown and has not been well quantified before. We developed and tested an audit tool that assesses compliance with best practices guidelines for portable ladder use designed for applications in the construction industry. Implemented on a hand-held computer, the assessment tool consisted of a series of checklists categorized in four groups; ladder condition, setup, moving on a ladder, and completing tasks from a ladder. For these four observational categories, the resulting tool contained 31 and 33 questions for step and extension ladders, respectively. Three individuals trained to use the tool scored a set of photographs and videos depicting 25 ladder conditions, 20 ladder setups, 10 users moving on ladders, and 13 users completing tasks from a ladder for a total of 78 observations. The assessment tool had good agreement across and within raters. For the three raters, agreement ranged from 79% to 97% across the questions. Within one subject, kappa coefficients for the intrarater reliability ranged from 0.67 to 0.91. The tool offers a practical method to quantify best practices associated with ladder use that can ultimately inform targeted intervention efforts.
建筑施工中从梯子上坠落的许多原因都与使用者的行为有关;然而,使用者遵守梯子使用最佳实践的程度尚不清楚,且此前未得到很好的量化。我们开发并测试了一种审计工具,该工具用于评估在建筑行业应用中便携式梯子使用的最佳实践指南的遵守情况。该评估工具安装在手持计算机上,由一系列分为四组的检查表组成;梯子状况、设置、在梯子上移动以及从梯子上完成任务。对于这四个观察类别,该工具分别针对直梯和伸缩梯包含31个和33个问题。三名经过培训使用该工具的人员对一组照片和视频进行了评分,这些照片和视频描绘了25种梯子状况、20种梯子设置、10名在梯子上移动的使用者以及13名从梯子上完成任务的使用者,共计78次观察。该评估工具在评分者之间和评分者内部都有很好的一致性。对于这三名评分者,各问题的一致性范围从79%到97%。在一个受试者内部,评分者内部可靠性的kappa系数范围从0.67到0.91。该工具提供了一种实用的方法来量化与梯子使用相关的最佳实践,最终可为有针对性的干预措施提供参考。