• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定建筑工地上员工激励计划的安全检查阈值。

Determining Safety Inspection Thresholds for Employee Incentives Programs on Construction Sites.

作者信息

Sparer Emily, Dennerlein Jack

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health.

出版信息

Saf Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.009.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.009
PMID:28638178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5476211/
Abstract

The goal of this project was to evaluate approaches of determining the numerical value of a safety inspection score that would activate a reward in an employee safety incentive program. Safety inspections are a reflection of the physical working conditions at a construction site and provide a safety score that can be used in incentive programs to reward workers. Yet it is unclear what level of safety should be used when implementing this kind of program. This study explored five ways of grouping safety inspection data collected during 19 months at Harvard University-owned construction projects. Each approach grouped the data by one of the following: owner, general contractor, project, trade, or subcontractor. The median value for each grouping provided the threshold score. These five approaches were then applied to data from a completed project in order to calculate the frequency and distribution of rewards in a monthly safety incentive program. The application of each approach was evaluated qualitatively for consistency, competitiveness, attainability, and fairness. The owner-specific approach resulted in a threshold score of 96.3% and met all of the qualitative evaluation goals. It had the most competitive reward distribution (only 1/3 of the project duration) yet it was also attainable. By treating all workers equally and maintaining the same value throughout the project duration, this approach was fair and consistent. The owner-based approach for threshold determination can be used by owners or general contractors when creating leading indicator incentives programs and by researchers in future studies on incentive program effectiveness.

摘要

本项目的目标是评估确定安全检查分数数值的方法,该分数将在员工安全激励计划中触发奖励。安全检查反映了建筑工地的实际工作条件,并提供一个可用于激励计划以奖励工人的安全分数。然而,在实施这类计划时,尚不清楚应采用何种安全水平。本研究探索了对在哈佛大学所属建筑项目的19个月期间收集的安全检查数据进行分组的五种方法。每种方法按以下之一对数据进行分组:业主、总承包商、项目、工种或分包商。每个分组的中位数提供了阈值分数。然后将这五种方法应用于一个已完成项目的数据,以计算月度安全激励计划中奖励的频率和分布。对每种方法的应用从一致性、竞争力、可实现性和公平性方面进行了定性评估。基于业主的方法得出的阈值分数为96.3%,并满足所有定性评估目标。它具有最具竞争力的奖励分布(仅占项目工期的1/3),但也是可实现的。通过平等对待所有工人并在整个项目工期内保持相同的标准,这种方法是公平且一致的。在创建领先指标激励计划时,业主或总承包商可采用基于业主的阈值确定方法,未来研究激励计划有效性的研究人员也可采用。

相似文献

1
Determining Safety Inspection Thresholds for Employee Incentives Programs on Construction Sites.确定建筑工地上员工激励计划的安全检查阈值。
Saf Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.009.
2
Development of a safety communication and recognition program for construction.制定建筑施工安全沟通与识别计划。
New Solut. 2015 May;25(1):42-58. doi: 10.1177/1048291115569025. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
3
The association between subcontractor safety management programs and worker perceived safety climate in commercial construction projects.商业建筑项目中,分包商安全管理计划与工人感知安全氛围之间的关联。
J Safety Res. 2020 Sep;74:279-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
Research on the Tournament Incentive Mechanism of the Safety Behavior for Construction Workers: Considering Multiple Heterogeneity.建筑工人安全行为的锦标赛激励机制研究:考虑多重异质性
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 13;12:796295. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796295. eCollection 2021.
5
6
Incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 18(5):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub5.
7
Financial incentives for return of service in underserved areas: a systematic review.为在服务欠缺地区提供服务而设的经济激励措施:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 May 29;9:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-86.
8
Flow-down of safety from general contractors to subcontractors working on commercial construction projects.安全责任从总承包商向从事商业建筑项目的分包商的下放。
Saf Sci. 2021 Oct;142. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105353. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
9
Investigating Rewards and Deposit Contract Financial Incentives for Physical Activity Behavior Change Using a Smartphone App: Randomized Controlled Trial.使用智能手机应用程序调查奖励和存款合同金融激励对体育活动行为改变的影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 6;24(10):e38339. doi: 10.2196/38339.
10
EMS Quality Improvement Programs急救医疗服务质量改进项目

引用本文的文献

1
An evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of construction workers' unsafe behavior: Considering incentive and risk loss.考虑激励和风险损失的建筑工人不安全行为的演化博弈分析
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;10:991994. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.991994. eCollection 2022.
2
Evolutionary Game Analysis of Construction Workers' Unsafe Behaviors Based on Incentive and Punishment Mechanisms.基于激励与惩罚机制的建筑工人不安全行为进化博弈分析
Front Psychol. 2022 May 24;13:907382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907382. eCollection 2022.
3
Factors Influencing Safety on Construction Projects (fSCPs): Types and Categories.影响建筑项目安全的因素 (fSCPs):类型和类别。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 16;18(20):10884. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010884.
4
Testing the associations between leading and lagging indicators in a contractor safety pre-qualification database.测试承包商安全资格预审数据库中领先和滞后指标之间的关联。
Am J Ind Med. 2019 Apr;62(4):317-324. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22951. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
Occupational safety and health in construction: a review of applications and trends.建筑行业的职业安全与健康:应用与趋势综述
Ind Health. 2017 Jun 8;55(3):210-218. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0108. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
Improving safety climate through a communication and recognition program for construction: a mixed methods study.通过一项针对建筑业的沟通与认可计划改善安全氛围:一项混合方法研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jul 1;42(4):329-37. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3569. Epub 2016 May 9.
7
Development of a safety communication and recognition program for construction.制定建筑施工安全沟通与识别计划。
New Solut. 2015 May;25(1):42-58. doi: 10.1177/1048291115569025. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Predicting subcontractor performance using web-based Evolutionary Fuzzy Neural Networks.使用基于网络的进化模糊神经网络预测分包商绩效。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Jun 19;2013:729525. doi: 10.1155/2013/729525. Print 2013.
9
Testing a better recognition tool.测试一个更好的识别工具。
Occup Health Saf. 2013 Apr;82(4):42, 44, 46.

本文引用的文献

1
[Case Study] CityCenter and Cosmopolitan Construction Projects, Las Vegas, Nevada: lessons learned from the use of multiple sources and mixed methods in a safety needs assessment.[案例研究] 内华达州拉斯维加斯市的 CityCenter 和 Cosmopolitan 建筑项目:从安全需求评估中使用多种来源和混合方法中吸取的教训。
J Safety Res. 2010 Jun;41(3):263-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 22.
2
Safety walkarounds predict injury risk and reduce injury rates in the construction industry.安全巡查可预测建筑行业的受伤风险,并降低受伤率。
Am J Ind Med. 2010 Jun;53(6):601-7. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20803.
3
Portable ladder assessment tool development and validation-quantifying best practices in the field.便携式梯子评估工具的开发与验证——量化该领域的最佳实践
Saf Sci. 2009 May 1;47(5):636-639. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.08.003.
4
Spreading good ideas: a case study of the adoption of an innovation in the construction sector.传播好点子:建筑领域创新采用的案例研究。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Sep;40(5):826-32. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
5
Inspections and severity: two safety leading indicators that you can use today.检查与严重程度:两个你如今可以运用的安全领先指标。
Occup Health Saf. 2008 Jul;77(7):87-8, 90.
6
"Cooking the books"--behavior-based safety at the San Francisco Bay Bridge.“篡改账目”——旧金山湾区大桥基于行为的安全措施
New Solut. 2007;17(4):311-24. doi: 10.2190/NS.17.4.g.
7
Contributing factors in construction accidents.建筑事故中的促成因素。
Appl Ergon. 2005 Jul;36(4):401-15. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.002. Epub 2005 Mar 27.
8
Rewarding safe behavior: strategies for change.奖励安全行为:变革策略
AAOHN J. 2004 Dec;52(12):521-7; quiz 528-9.
9
Great Safety Performance: an improvement process using leading indicators.卓越的安全性能:一个使用领先指标的改进过程。
AAOHN J. 2004 Dec;52(12):511-20.
10
Construction work practices and conditions improved after 2-years' participation in the HomeSafe pilot program.在参与“居家安全”试点项目两年后,建筑施工操作规范和条件得到了改善。
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2003 May-Jun;64(3):346-51. doi: 10.1080/15428110308984826.