Sparer Emily, Dennerlein Jack
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health.
Saf Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.009.
The goal of this project was to evaluate approaches of determining the numerical value of a safety inspection score that would activate a reward in an employee safety incentive program. Safety inspections are a reflection of the physical working conditions at a construction site and provide a safety score that can be used in incentive programs to reward workers. Yet it is unclear what level of safety should be used when implementing this kind of program. This study explored five ways of grouping safety inspection data collected during 19 months at Harvard University-owned construction projects. Each approach grouped the data by one of the following: owner, general contractor, project, trade, or subcontractor. The median value for each grouping provided the threshold score. These five approaches were then applied to data from a completed project in order to calculate the frequency and distribution of rewards in a monthly safety incentive program. The application of each approach was evaluated qualitatively for consistency, competitiveness, attainability, and fairness. The owner-specific approach resulted in a threshold score of 96.3% and met all of the qualitative evaluation goals. It had the most competitive reward distribution (only 1/3 of the project duration) yet it was also attainable. By treating all workers equally and maintaining the same value throughout the project duration, this approach was fair and consistent. The owner-based approach for threshold determination can be used by owners or general contractors when creating leading indicator incentives programs and by researchers in future studies on incentive program effectiveness.
本项目的目标是评估确定安全检查分数数值的方法,该分数将在员工安全激励计划中触发奖励。安全检查反映了建筑工地的实际工作条件,并提供一个可用于激励计划以奖励工人的安全分数。然而,在实施这类计划时,尚不清楚应采用何种安全水平。本研究探索了对在哈佛大学所属建筑项目的19个月期间收集的安全检查数据进行分组的五种方法。每种方法按以下之一对数据进行分组:业主、总承包商、项目、工种或分包商。每个分组的中位数提供了阈值分数。然后将这五种方法应用于一个已完成项目的数据,以计算月度安全激励计划中奖励的频率和分布。对每种方法的应用从一致性、竞争力、可实现性和公平性方面进行了定性评估。基于业主的方法得出的阈值分数为96.3%,并满足所有定性评估目标。它具有最具竞争力的奖励分布(仅占项目工期的1/3),但也是可实现的。通过平等对待所有工人并在整个项目工期内保持相同的标准,这种方法是公平且一致的。在创建领先指标激励计划时,业主或总承包商可采用基于业主的阈值确定方法,未来研究激励计划有效性的研究人员也可采用。