Ganster D C, Schaubroeck J, Sime W E, Mayes B T
Department of Management, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701.
J Appl Psychol. 1991 Feb;76(1):143-68. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.143.
The nomological validity of the Type A behavior pattern was explored. The Structured Interview (SI) and a battery of personality trait, physical health, and strain measures were administered to an occupationally diverse sample of 568 workers. Ss were also monitored for physiological reactivity and recovery (blood pressure, heart rate, skin temperature, and electrodermal response) to the SI and a subsequent Stroop Color-Word Conflict Task. A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that SI scores can be factored into three distinct dimensions. There was considerable overlap in the patterns of personality traits that characterized the Type A components, but only a Hostility dimension was significantly related to physiological reactivity and recovery. The results have implications for distinguishing coronary-proneness from the more traditional Type A conceptualization.
对A型行为模式的法则效度进行了探究。对568名职业各异的工人样本进行了结构化访谈(SI)以及一系列人格特质、身体健康和压力测量。还监测了研究对象对结构化访谈及随后的斯特鲁普色词冲突任务的生理反应和恢复情况(血压、心率、皮肤温度和皮电反应)。验证性因素分析表明,结构化访谈得分可分解为三个不同维度。构成A型各成分的人格特质模式存在相当大的重叠,但只有敌意维度与生理反应和恢复显著相关。这些结果对于区分冠心病易感性与更传统的A型概念具有启示意义。