• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼前房内直径成像方式的比较:35MHz 超声生物显微镜、Visante 光学相干断层扫描仪和 Pentacam。

Comparison of internal anterior chamber diameter imaging modalities: 35-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy, Visante optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):120-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-07. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20100121-07
PMID:20163076
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the internal diameter of the anterior chamber among three different imaging modalities: 35-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), Visante optical coherence tomography (OCT), and Pentacam, and to compare the internal diameters with white-to-white (WTW) distance measured by Orbscan.

METHODS

The internal horizontal anterior chamber diameter was measured in 20 normal eyes using 35-MHz UBM (Optikon), Visante OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec), and Pentacam (Oculus Inc). The mean horizontal anterior chamber diameters were compared, and the correlations between each pair of two different methods were evaluated. Horizontal WTW distance was measured by Orbscan IIz (Bausch & Lomb-Orbtek Inc) and then correlated with the measurements of internal anterior chamber diameter.

RESULTS

The mean horizontal anterior chamber diameter was 10.99+/-0.47 mm with UBM, 11.70+/-0.47 mm with OCT, and 11.86+/-0.45 mm with Pentacam. Ultrasound biomicroscopy measurements were significantly different than those of OCT and Pentacam (P<.001 for both). However, no significant difference was found between OCT and Pentacam (P=.19). Regarding the correlations between each pair of two different methods, UBM and OCT showed significant correlation (r=0.848, P<.001), but there was no significant correlation between OCT and Pentacam (r=0.403, P=.078), even though the mean values were similar. In the Bland-Altman plots, the range of agreement was 0.51 mm between OCT and UBM, and 0.99 mm between Pentacam and OCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the internal anterior chamber diameters measured by 35-MHz UBM were significantly smaller than those measured by Visante OCT and Pentacam, the measurements of UBM and Visante OCT showed significant correlation and good agreement with each other. Pentacam showed poor correlation with other measurements.

摘要

目的

比较三种不同成像模式(35MHz 超声生物显微镜(UBM)、Visante 光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和 Pentacam)的前房内径,并将内径与 Orbscan 测量的白对白(WTW)距离进行比较。

方法

使用 35MHz UBM(Optikon)、Visante OCT(Carl Zeiss Meditec)和 Pentacam(Oculus Inc)测量 20 只正常眼的水平前房内直径。比较平均水平前房直径,并评估每对两种不同方法之间的相关性。使用 Orbscan IIz(Bausch & Lomb-Orbtek Inc)测量水平 WTW 距离,并与内部前房直径的测量结果相关联。

结果

UBM 的平均水平前房直径为 10.99+/-0.47mm,OCT 为 11.70+/-0.47mm,Pentacam 为 11.86+/-0.45mm。UBM 测量值与 OCT 和 Pentacam 测量值显著不同(两者均 P<.001)。然而,OCT 和 Pentacam 之间没有发现显著差异(P=.19)。关于每对两种不同方法之间的相关性,UBM 和 OCT 显示出显著相关性(r=0.848,P<.001),但 OCT 和 Pentacam 之间没有显著相关性(r=0.403,P=.078),尽管平均值相似。在 Bland-Altman 图中,OCT 和 UBM 之间的一致性范围为 0.51mm,Pentacam 和 OCT 之间为 0.99mm。

结论

尽管 35MHz UBM 测量的前房内直径明显小于 Visante OCT 和 Pentacam 测量的直径,但 UBM 和 Visante OCT 的测量值显示出显著的相关性,彼此之间具有良好的一致性。Pentacam 与其他测量值相关性较差。

相似文献

1
Comparison of internal anterior chamber diameter imaging modalities: 35-MHz ultrasound biomicroscopy, Visante optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam.眼前房内直径成像方式的比较:35MHz 超声生物显微镜、Visante 光学相干断层扫描仪和 Pentacam。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):120-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-07. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
2
Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white-to-white distances using automated measurements.使用光学相干断层扫描测量的前房内径与使用自动测量的白对白距离的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Nov;32(11):1809-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.023.
3
Assessment and comparison of anterior chamber dimensions using various imaging techniques.使用各种成像技术对前房尺寸进行评估和比较。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Jan-Feb;41(1):115-22. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20091230-21.
4
Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam.使用 Visante OCT、Orbscan 和 Pentacam 测量中央角膜厚度、前房深度和瞳孔直径。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;26(2):127-33. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-08. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
5
Assessment of anterior chamber depth using Visante optical coherence tomography, slitlamp optical coherence tomography, IOL Master, Pentacam and Orbscan IIz.使用 Visante 光学相干断层扫描仪、裂隙灯光学相干断层扫描仪、IOL Master、Pentacam 和 Orbscan IIz 评估前房深度。
Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(6):341-6. doi: 10.1159/000313815. Epub 2010 May 4.
6
Anterior chamber angle measurement with anterior segment optical coherence tomography: a comparison between slit lamp OCT and Visante OCT.眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量前房角:裂隙灯OCT与Visante OCT的比较
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Aug;49(8):3469-74. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1477. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
7
Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy.超声生物显微镜与光学相干断层扫描测量人工晶状体眼和无晶状体眼前房中央深度的重复性、可再现性和一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.038.
8
Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements by 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography, partial coherence interferometry biometry, Scheimpflug rotating camera imaging, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.三维光学相干断层扫描、部分相干干涉测量生物测量、Scheimpflug 旋转相机成像和超声生物显微镜测量前房深度的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.036. Epub 2012 May 19.
9
Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.裂隙灯光学相干断层扫描与Visante光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的对比研究
Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):796-801.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
10
Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and Orbscan II.使用Galilei、HR Pentacam和Orbscan II测量前房深度的比较。
Optometry. 2010 Jan;81(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2009.04.100.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging of Anterior Segment Tumours: A Comparison of Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Versus Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.眼前节肿瘤的影像学检查:超声生物显微镜与眼前节光学相干断层扫描的比较
Cureus. 2024 Jan 19;16(1):e52578. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52578. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Repeatability and agreement of white-to-white measurements between slit-scanning tomography, infrared biometry, dual rotating Scheimpflug camera/Placido disc tomography, and swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography.眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪、红外生物测量仪、双旋转 Scheimpflug 相机/Placido 盘断层扫描仪和扫频源眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪的白对白测量重复性和一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254832. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparative Study of the Effects of 1% Atropine on the Anterior Segment.1%阿托品对眼前节影响的比较研究
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 28;2020:5125243. doi: 10.1155/2020/5125243. eCollection 2020.
4
Device interchangeability on anterior chamber depth and white-to-white measurements: a thorough literature review.前房深度和白对白测量中的设备互换性:全面的文献综述
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 18;9(7):1057-65. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.07.20. eCollection 2016.
5
Spontaneous Scleral Perforation of an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens.前房人工晶状体自发性巩膜穿孔
Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016 May 9;7(1):249-52. doi: 10.1159/000445880. eCollection 2016 Jan-Apr.
6
[Biometry of the anterior eye segment for implantation of phakic anterior chamber lenses. A comparison of current measurement devices].[用于植入有晶状体眼前房人工晶状体的眼前节生物测量。当前测量设备的比较]
Ophthalmologe. 2012 Mar;109(3):242-9. doi: 10.1007/s00347-011-2520-9.