Department of Livestock Production & Management, Orissa Veterinary College Bhubaneswar, India.
Anim Sci J. 2009 Apr;80(2):149-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2008.00620.x.
A 2 x 3 factorial design was used to study the impact of rearing systems, individual (I) versus group (G) and different levels of milk/skim milk feeding (F1, F2 and F3) on hemato-biochemical profile, disease incidence and average daily gain of crossbred (Bos indicus x Bos taurus) calves. Six calves were taken in each group on the basis of their birth weight and housed in individual (2.20 x 1.16 m(2)/calf) or in group pens (2.20 x 1.03 m(2)/calf). After 3 days of colostrum feeding, calves were allocated to one of three different milk feeding schedules: milk fed up to 8 weeks of age (F1), milk up to 4 weeks followed by 50% replacement by skim milk up to 6 weeks and 100% thereafter (F2) and 100% replacement of milk with skim milk after 4 weeks (F3). Calf starter and cereal green fodders were fed ad libitum from the second week of age and continued for 14 weeks. Parameters on health and disease profiles of calves (disease incidence, duration of illness, response to treatment and recovery) and weekly live weight change were recorded. Calf scour predominated (52.8%), followed by joint ill (25.0%) and respiratory infections (19.4%). The disease incidence was greater (P < 0.01) in individually housed calves (94.4 vs. 55.9%). The management of navel ill required longer recovery (7.01 days) followed by joint ill (4.87 days) and respiratory infection (4.86 days). The average daily gain during 0-14 weeks of age was higher (P < 0.01) in group-housed calves (433 +/- 22 vs. 355 +/- 31 g), while the effect of feeding was not significant. Blood samples collected at 4, 8 and 14 weeks of age showed some periodic higher concentrations (but within normal range) of plasma urea and total protein in group housed calves on F2 and F3 feeding schedules in response to high protein intake. Other parameters remained non-significantly different. Thus, group-housed calves can be reared successfully with comparatively better performance and less illness than individually housed ones under the present health care and housing management system. However, the system should not be used as a substitute for good management, and frequent observations of calves should be an integral part of any successful rearing program.
采用 2 x 3 析因设计研究了饲养系统(个体 I 与群体 G)和不同牛奶/脱脂奶喂养水平(F1、F2 和 F3)对杂交(印度野牛 x 瘤牛)犊牛血液生化特性、疾病发生率和平均日增重的影响。根据初生重,每组选取 6 头犊牛,分别饲养在个体(2.20 x 1.16 m2/犊牛)或群体围栏(2.20 x 1.03 m2/犊牛)中。在接受 3 天初乳喂养后,犊牛按照以下三种不同的牛奶喂养方案之一进行分配:喂养至 8 周龄的牛奶(F1)、喂养至 4 周龄的牛奶,然后用 50%的脱脂奶替代至 6 周龄,之后 100%用脱脂奶替代(F2)和在 4 周龄后用 100%的脱脂奶替代牛奶(F3)。从第二周龄开始,犊牛自由采食犊牛代乳料和谷物青绿饲料,并持续 14 周。记录犊牛健康和疾病状况(疾病发生率、发病持续时间、治疗反应和恢复情况)和每周活重变化等参数。腹泻(52.8%)是最常见的疾病,其次是关节病(25.0%)和呼吸道感染(19.4%)。单独饲养的犊牛发病率更高(P < 0.01)(94.4% vs. 55.9%)。与关节病(4.87 天)和呼吸道感染(4.86 天)相比,脐炎的恢复时间更长(7.01 天)。0-14 周龄的平均日增重(P < 0.01)在群体饲养的犊牛中更高(433 +/- 22 vs. 355 +/- 31 g),而喂养方式的影响不显著。4、8 和 14 周龄时采集的血液样本显示,在 F2 和 F3 喂养方案下,群体饲养的犊牛血浆尿素和总蛋白浓度周期性升高(但仍在正常范围内),这是对高蛋白摄入的反应。其他参数没有显著差异。因此,在目前的保健和饲养管理系统下,与单独饲养的犊牛相比,群体饲养的犊牛可以成功饲养,具有更好的性能和更少的疾病。然而,该系统不能作为良好管理的替代品,对犊牛的频繁观察应该是任何成功饲养计划的一个组成部分。