• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测大型数据集的 MHC Ⅰ类表位。

Predicting MHC class I epitopes in large datasets.

机构信息

Department of Computational Biology and Applied Algorithmics, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, 66123 Saarbruecken, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 17;11:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-90.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2105-11-90
PMID:20163709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2836306/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experimental screening of large sets of peptides with respect to their MHC binding capabilities is still very demanding due to the large number of possible peptide sequences and the extensive polymorphism of the MHC proteins. Therefore, there is significant interest in the development of computational methods for predicting the binding capability of peptides to MHC molecules, as a first step towards selecting peptides for actual screening.

RESULTS

We have examined the performance of four diverse MHC Class I prediction methods on comparatively large HLA-A and HLA-B allele peptide binding datasets extracted from the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis resource (IEDB). The chosen methods span a representative cross-section of available methodology for MHC binding predictions. Until the development of IEDB, such an analysis was not possible, as the available peptide sequence datasets were small and spread out over many separate efforts. We tested three datasets which differ in the IC50 cutoff criteria used to select the binders and non-binders. The best performance was achieved when predictions were performed on the dataset consisting only of strong binders (IC50 less than 10 nM) and clear non-binders (IC50 greater than 10,000 nM). In addition, robustness of the predictions was only achieved for alleles that were represented with a sufficiently large (greater than 200), balanced set of binders and non-binders.

CONCLUSIONS

All four methods show good to excellent performance on the comprehensive datasets, with the artificial neural networks based method outperforming the other methods. However, all methods show pronounced difficulties in correctly categorizing intermediate binders.

摘要

背景

由于可能的肽序列数量众多且 MHC 蛋白广泛多态性,因此对大量肽进行 MHC 结合能力的实验筛选仍然非常具有挑战性。因此,开发用于预测肽与 MHC 分子结合能力的计算方法具有重要意义,作为实际筛选中选择肽的第一步。

结果

我们在从免疫表位数据库和分析资源 (IEDB) 中提取的相对较大的 HLA-A 和 HLA-B 等位基因肽结合数据集上,检查了四种不同的 MHC 类 I 预测方法的性能。所选方法涵盖了 MHC 结合预测中可用方法的代表性交叉部分。在 IEDB 开发之前,这种分析是不可能的,因为可用的肽序列数据集很小,分布在许多单独的工作中。我们测试了三个数据集,这些数据集在用于选择结合物和非结合物的 IC50 截止标准上有所不同。当仅对由强结合物(IC50 小于 10 nM)和明确的非结合物(IC50 大于 10,000 nM)组成的数据集进行预测时,获得了最佳性能。此外,只有在具有足够大(大于 200)、平衡的结合物和非结合物集的等位基因上才能实现预测的稳健性。

结论

所有四种方法在综合数据集上均表现出良好到优异的性能,基于人工神经网络的方法表现优于其他方法。然而,所有方法在正确分类中间结合物方面都存在明显的困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f5/2836306/6451bd1b5eb5/1471-2105-11-90-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f5/2836306/8c9641b224cd/1471-2105-11-90-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f5/2836306/9ecd0881407b/1471-2105-11-90-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f5/2836306/6451bd1b5eb5/1471-2105-11-90-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f5/2836306/8c9641b224cd/1471-2105-11-90-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f5/2836306/9ecd0881407b/1471-2105-11-90-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f5/2836306/6451bd1b5eb5/1471-2105-11-90-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting MHC class I epitopes in large datasets.预测大型数据集的 MHC Ⅰ类表位。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 17;11:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-90.
2
Improved prediction of MHC class I binders/non-binders peptides through artificial neural network using variable learning rate: SARS corona virus, a case study.通过使用可变学习率的人工神经网络提高 MHC Ⅰ类结合肽/非结合肽的预测:以 SARS 冠状病毒为例的研究。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011;696:223-9. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7046-6_22.
3
Prediction of MHC-binding peptides of flexible lengths from sequence-derived structural and physicochemical properties.基于序列衍生的结构和物理化学性质预测可变长度的MHC结合肽段
Mol Immunol. 2007 Feb;44(5):866-77. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
4
MHC-BPS: MHC-binder prediction server for identifying peptides of flexible lengths from sequence-derived physicochemical properties.MHC-BPS:用于从序列衍生的物理化学性质中识别可变长度肽段的MHC结合物预测服务器。
Immunogenetics. 2006 Aug;58(8):607-13. doi: 10.1007/s00251-006-0117-2. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
5
MultiRTA: a simple yet reliable method for predicting peptide binding affinities for multiple class II MHC allotypes.MultiRTA:一种简单而可靠的方法,用于预测多种 II 类 MHC 同种异型的肽结合亲和力。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Sep 24;11:482. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-482.
6
A hybrid approach for predicting promiscuous MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes.一种预测混杂的主要组织相容性复合体I类限制性T细胞表位的混合方法。
J Biosci. 2007 Jan;32(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s12038-007-0004-5.
7
PepDist: a new framework for protein-peptide binding prediction based on learning peptide distance functions.PepDist:一种基于学习肽距离函数的蛋白质-肽结合预测新框架。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Mar 20;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S1-S3.
8
NetMHC-3.0: accurate web accessible predictions of human, mouse and monkey MHC class I affinities for peptides of length 8-11.NetMHC-3.0:可通过网络访问的、对长度为8至11个氨基酸的人、小鼠和猴MHC I类肽亲和力的准确预测。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W509-12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn202. Epub 2008 May 7.
9
Pan-specific MHC class I predictors: a benchmark of HLA class I pan-specific prediction methods.泛特异性MHC I类预测因子:HLA I类泛特异性预测方法的基准。
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 1;25(1):83-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn579. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
10
Application of machine learning techniques in predicting MHC binders.机器学习技术在预测MHC结合物中的应用。
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;409:201-15. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-118-9_14.

引用本文的文献

1
Iris Antes 1969-2021.艾丽斯·安特斯 1969 - 2021年。
Bioinform Adv. 2022 May 4;2(1):vbac024. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbac024. eCollection 2022.
2
Computationally-Aided Modeling of Hsp70-Client Interactions: Past, Present, and Future.基于计算的 HSP70-客户相互作用建模:过去、现在和未来。
J Phys Chem B. 2022 Sep 15;126(36):6780-6791. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c03806. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
3
Sequence-based approach for rapid identification of cross-clade CD8+ T-cell vaccine candidates from all high-risk HPV strains.基于序列的方法,用于从所有高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)毒株中快速鉴定跨亚型CD8 + T细胞疫苗候选物。

本文引用的文献

1
MHCBN 4.0: A database of MHC/TAP binding peptides and T-cell epitopes.MHCBN 4.0:一个主要组织相容性复合体/抗原加工相关转运体结合肽和T细胞表位的数据库。
BMC Res Notes. 2009 Apr 20;2:61. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-61.
2
Pan-specific MHC class I predictors: a benchmark of HLA class I pan-specific prediction methods.泛特异性MHC I类预测因子:HLA I类泛特异性预测方法的基准。
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 1;25(1):83-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn579. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
3
Definition of MHC supertypes through clustering of MHC peptide-binding repertoires.
3 Biotech. 2016 Jun;6(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s13205-015-0352-z. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
4
In-silico discovery of cancer-specific peptide-HLA complexes for targeted therapy.用于靶向治疗的癌症特异性肽-HLA复合物的计算机模拟发现
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Jul 20;17:286. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1150-2.
5
HLA class I molecular variation and peptide-binding properties suggest a model of joint divergent asymmetric selection.HLA I类分子变异与肽结合特性提示了一种联合的趋异不对称选择模型。
Immunogenetics. 2016 Jul;68(6-7):401-416. doi: 10.1007/s00251-016-0918-x. Epub 2016 May 27.
6
Positive Selection in CD8+ T-Cell Epitopes of Influenza Virus Nucleoprotein Revealed by a Comparative Analysis of Human and Swine Viral Lineages.通过对人类和猪流感病毒谱系的比较分析揭示流感病毒核蛋白CD8 + T细胞表位中的阳性选择
J Virol. 2015 Nov;89(22):11275-83. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01571-15. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
7
Deciphering complex patterns of class-I HLA-peptide cross-reactivity via hierarchical grouping.通过分层分组解析I类HLA-肽交叉反应的复杂模式。
Immunol Cell Biol. 2015 Jul;93(6):522-32. doi: 10.1038/icb.2015.3. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
8
A novel tuberculosis antigen identified from human tuberculosis granulomas.一种从人结核肉芽肿中鉴定出的新型结核抗原。
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015 Apr;14(4):1093-103. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.045237. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
9
Influence of high hydrostatic pressure on epitope mapping of tobacco mosaic virus coat protein.高静压对烟草花叶病毒外壳蛋白表位作图的影响。
Viral Immunol. 2014 Mar;27(2):60-74. doi: 10.1089/vim.2013.0088.
10
Genome-wide structural modelling of TCR-pMHC interactions.TCR-pMHC相互作用的全基因组结构建模
BMC Genomics. 2013;14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S5-S5. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
通过MHC肽结合库的聚类来定义MHC超型。
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;409:163-73. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-118-9_11.
4
Evaluation of MHC class I peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research.MHC I类肽结合预测服务器的评估:疫苗研究中的应用
BMC Immunol. 2008 Mar 16;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-9-8.
5
HLA class I supertypes: a revised and updated classification.HLA I类超型:修订与更新后的分类
BMC Immunol. 2008 Jan 22;9:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-9-1.
6
Efficient peptide-MHC-I binding prediction for alleles with few known binders.针对已知结合肽较少的等位基因进行高效的肽-MHC-I结合预测。
Bioinformatics. 2008 Feb 1;24(3):358-66. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm611. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
7
Methods and protocols for prediction of immunogenic epitopes.免疫原性表位预测的方法与方案。
Brief Bioinform. 2007 Mar;8(2):96-108. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbl038. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
8
Learning MHC I--peptide binding.学习主要组织相容性复合体I类分子-肽结合。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e227-35. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl255.
9
DynaPred: a structure and sequence based method for the prediction of MHC class I binding peptide sequences and conformations.DynaPred:一种基于结构和序列预测MHC I类结合肽序列和构象的方法。
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 15;22(14):e16-24. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl216.
10
A community resource benchmarking predictions of peptide binding to MHC-I molecules.一种用于肽与MHC-I分子结合预测的社区资源基准测试。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Jun 9;2(6):e65. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065.