Department of Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
World J Surg. 2010 Jul;34(7):1653-62. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0485-5.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the use of laparoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment for hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the outcomes of 86 hemodynamically stable patients with suspected intra-abdominal injuries from abdominal stab wounds who underwent either exploratory laparotomy or diagnostic laparoscopy. Thirty-eight patients (group A) were treated before the adoption of laparoscopy as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for abdominal stabbing injuries at our hospital, and 48 patients (group B) were treated after. Demographic information, injury severity, operative findings, rates of nontherapeutic interventions, operation time, length of hospital stay, and morbidity of the two groups were evaluated.
There was no difference in the demographics and injury severity between the two groups. Laparoscopy decreased the nontherapeutic laparotomy rate from 57.9% in group A to 0% in group B (P < 0.001). The accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy was 100% in group B. Patients in group B had a significantly shorter hospital stay (5.0 days versus 9.9 days; P < 0.001) and shorter operation time (90.7 min vs. 118.7 min; P = 0.019) than group A. For patients in group B with significant intra-abdominal injuries, therapeutic laparoscopy was successfully performed in 16 of 17 patients (94.1%), treating a total of 22 intra-abdominal injuries.
Laparoscopy is feasible and safe for the diagnosis and treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds. It can reduce the nontherapeutic laparotomy rate and shorten the length of hospital stay.
本研究旨在评估腹腔镜在诊断和治疗血流动力学稳定的腹部刺伤患者中的应用。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了 86 例血流动力学稳定的腹部刺伤疑似腹腔内损伤患者的治疗结果,这些患者分别接受了剖腹探查术或诊断性腹腔镜检查。38 例患者(A 组)在我院将腹腔镜作为诊断和治疗腹部刺伤的工具之前接受治疗,48 例患者(B 组)在之后接受治疗。评估了两组患者的人口统计学资料、损伤严重程度、手术结果、非治疗性干预的发生率、手术时间、住院时间和发病率。
两组患者的人口统计学资料和损伤严重程度无差异。与 A 组 57.9%的非治疗性剖腹手术率相比,B 组的这一比例降为 0%(P < 0.001)。B 组诊断性腹腔镜检查的准确率为 100%。B 组患者的住院时间明显短于 A 组(5.0 天比 9.9 天;P < 0.001),手术时间也明显短于 A 组(90.7 分钟比 118.7 分钟;P = 0.019)。对于 B 组有明显腹腔内损伤的患者,17 例中有 16 例(94.1%)成功实施了治疗性腹腔镜检查,共治疗了 22 处腹腔内损伤。
腹腔镜检查对于诊断和治疗血流动力学稳定的腹部刺伤患者是可行和安全的。它可以降低非治疗性剖腹手术率,缩短住院时间。