Faculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
J Med Virol. 2010 Apr;82(4):675-83. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21725.
Human infection with the novel pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus was first identified in April 2009. Two months later, the World Health Organization (WHO) had raised the pandemic level to phase 6. Rapid case identification is essential for prompt patient management and public health actions. This study developed real-time and conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR and cRT-PCR) assays for pandemic H1N1 detection, and compared their sensitivities with protocols developed by WHO reference centres. Altogether, three rRT-PCR and one cRT-PCR targeting the matrix gene for universal detection of influenza A; three rRT-PCR, one cRT-PCR targeting the hemagglutinin (HA) gene for specific detection of pandemic H1N1; and one multiplex cRT-PCR for differentiating co-circulating seasonal H1N1, H3N2, and pandemic H1N1 were examined. The lower detection limit ranged from 1.252 to 125.2 copy equivalents. In general, rRT-PCR assays were more sensitive than cRT-PCR assays. All assays showed 100% sensitivity for "optimal" specimens (nasopharyngeal samples collected within 4 days after illness onset). For the other 36 samples, cRT-PCR assays were less sensitive except that the new Protocol I-cRT-pdmH1 still retained 100% sensitivity. The new Protocol F-rRT-PCR-pdmH1 was the only pandemic virus-specific rRT-PCR assay with 100% sensitivity across all specimen categories. In conclusion, rRT-PCR assays are 10-fold more sensitive than cRT-PCR assays. The newly developed cRT-PCR assay targeting the HA gene allows rapid, specific, and sensitive screening of this novel agent, which can serve as an alternative for laboratories where a real-time PCR machine is not available.
人感染新型大流行性流感 A(H1N1)病毒于 2009 年 4 月首次被确认。两个月后,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)将大流行级别提高到 6 级。快速鉴定病例对于及时治疗患者和开展公共卫生行动至关重要。本研究开发了用于大流行性 H1N1 检测的实时和常规逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR 和 cRT-PCR)检测法,并将其敏感性与世界卫生组织参考中心制定的方案进行了比较。总共,三种 rRT-PCR 和一种 cRT-PCR 针对基质基因用于普遍检测流感 A;三种 rRT-PCR、一种 cRT-PCR 针对血凝素(HA)基因用于特异性检测大流行性 H1N1;以及一种用于区分同时流行的季节性 H1N1、H3N2 和大流行性 H1N1 的多重 cRT-PCR 进行了检查。最低检测限范围为 1.252 至 125.2 拷贝当量。总体而言,rRT-PCR 检测法比 cRT-PCR 检测法更灵敏。所有检测法对“最佳”标本(发病后 4 天内采集的鼻咽样本)的敏感性均为 100%。对于其他 36 个样本,除新方案 I-cRT-pdmH1 仍保持 100%的敏感性外,cRT-PCR 检测法的敏感性较低。新方案 F-rRT-PCR-pdmH1 是唯一具有 100%敏感性的大流行性病毒特异性 rRT-PCR 检测法,适用于所有标本类别。总之,rRT-PCR 检测法比 cRT-PCR 检测法灵敏 10 倍。新开发的针对 HA 基因的 cRT-PCR 检测法可快速、特异、灵敏地筛选新型试剂,可作为没有实时 PCR 仪器的实验室的替代方法。