Suppr超能文献

基底神经节运动控制。I. 苍白球放电与五种运动模式的非排他性关系。

Basal ganglia motor control. I. Nonexclusive relation of pallidal discharge to five movement modes.

作者信息

Mink J W, Thach W T

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1991 Feb;65(2):273-300. doi: 10.1152/jn.1991.65.2.273.

Abstract
  1. To evaluate the various hypotheses that the basal ganglia preferentially control one mode of movement to the exclusion of others, we recorded the discharge of single neurons in the globus pallidus (GP) in rhesus monkeys during their performance of five trained wrist-movement tasks. The tasks were designed to dissociate several modes and parameters of movement to see whether pallidal neurons would discharge in relation to one and not the others. All tasks were performed by flexing and extending the wrist with opposing or assisting torque loads (0.2 Nm). The five tasks included 1) VisStep, a visually cued step tracking task; 2) VisRamp, a visually guided hold-ramp-hold tracking task; 3) VisSine, a visually guided rapid sinusoidal tracking task; 4) SelfRamp, a self-paced hold-ramp-hold task with delayed alternation, trained velocity, and no visual feedback of wrist position; and 5) SelfSine, a self-paced rapid sinusoidal movement without visual feedback of wrist position. Wrist position and velocity were monitored during all recordings; and wrist, arm, shoulder, and back electromyographs (EMGs) were monitored periodically. Unit discharge was recorded extracellularly from both segments of the GP. The results were similar in the present analysis and are considered together. As a control, units were also recorded in the dentate nucleus of the lateral cerebellum, and the EMGs of many muscles were recorded in limbs, neck and trunk. 2. For 100 GP neurons [41 in the internal segment (GPi) and 59 in the external segment (GPe)], the activity of which changed with task performance, the discharge patterns varied greatly across tasks. The discharge of 96/97 neurons (99%) changed during VisStep, 66/91 neurons (73%) changed during VisRamp, 41/81 neurons (51%) changed during VisSine, 7/34 neurons (21%) changed during SelfRamp, and 25/80 neurons (31%) changed during SelfSine. Of 74 neurons that were fully tested in four or more tasks, 16 (21%) were related only to one task; only 17 cells (23%) were related to all tasks; and, for the remaining 41 (55%) neurons, the relation of the discharge of a given neuron to one task did not predict its relation to other tasks. These task-dependent differences in the discharge of pallidal neurons were not correlated with differences in wrist position, velocity, load, or muscle activity (see also the following paper--Mink and Thach, 1991a). 3. From these data, we conclude that no one task engaged all pallidal neurons to the exclusion of other tasks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 为了评估基底神经节优先控制一种运动模式而排除其他模式的各种假说,我们在恒河猴执行五项训练过的腕部运动任务期间,记录了苍白球(GP)单个神经元的放电情况。这些任务旨在区分几种运动模式和参数,以观察苍白球神经元是否会相对于某一种运动模式而非其他模式放电。所有任务均通过在有对抗或辅助扭矩负荷(0.2牛米)的情况下弯曲和伸展手腕来完成。这五项任务包括:1)VisStep,一个视觉提示的阶梯跟踪任务;2)VisRamp,一个视觉引导的保持 - 斜坡 - 保持跟踪任务;3)VisSine,一个视觉引导的快速正弦跟踪任务;4)SelfRamp,一个自定节奏的保持 - 斜坡 - 保持任务,有延迟交替、设定速度且无手腕位置的视觉反馈;5)SelfSine,一个无手腕位置视觉反馈的自定节奏快速正弦运动。在所有记录过程中监测手腕位置和速度;并定期监测手腕、手臂、肩膀和背部的肌电图(EMG)。从GP的两个节段进行细胞外单位放电记录。本分析中的结果相似,一并考虑。作为对照,也在外侧小脑的齿状核中记录单位放电,并在四肢、颈部和躯干记录许多肌肉的EMG。2. 对于100个其活动随任务执行而变化的GP神经元[41个在内侧节段(GPi),59个在外侧节段(GPe)],其放电模式在不同任务中差异很大。96/97个神经元(99%)在VisStep期间放电发生变化,66/91个神经元(73%)在VisRamp期间放电发生变化,41/81个神经元(51%)在VisSine期间放电发生变化,7/34个神经元(21%)在SelfRamp期间放电发生变化,25/80个神经元(31%)在SelfSine期间放电发生变化。在74个在四项或更多任务中得到充分测试的神经元中,16个(21%)仅与一项任务相关;只有17个细胞(23%)与所有任务相关;对于其余41个(55%)神经元,给定神经元的放电与一项任务的关系并不能预测其与其他任务的关系。苍白球神经元放电的这些任务依赖性差异与手腕位置、速度、负荷或肌肉活动的差异无关(另见下文——明克和萨奇,1991a)。3. 根据这些数据,我们得出结论,没有一项任务能使所有苍白球神经元都参与而排除其他任务。(摘要截短至400字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验