• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention for adolescents when implemented by community-based organizations: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.社区组织实施的青少年艾滋病/性传播感染预防干预的效果:一项集群随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr;100(4):720-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.140657. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
2
Efficacy of sexually transmitted disease/human immunodeficiency virus sexual risk-reduction intervention for african american adolescent females seeking sexual health services: a randomized controlled trial.性传播疾病/人类免疫缺陷病毒性风险降低干预措施对寻求性健康服务的非裔美国青少年女性的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Dec;163(12):1112-21. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.205.
3
School-based randomized controlled trial of an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention for South African adolescents.针对南非青少年的一项降低艾滋病毒/性传播感染风险干预措施的校本随机对照试验。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Oct;164(10):923-9. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.176.
4
National Institute of Mental Health Multisite Eban HIV/STD Prevention Intervention for African American HIV Serodiscordant Couples: a cluster randomized trial.美国国立精神卫生研究所针对非裔美国艾滋病毒血清学不一致伴侣的多地点埃班艾滋病毒/性传播感染预防干预:一项整群随机试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 27;170(17):1594-601. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.261. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
5
HIV/STD risk reduction interventions for African American and Latino adolescent girls at an adolescent medicine clinic: a randomized controlled trial.青少年医学诊所针对非裔美国和拉丁裔少女的降低HIV/性传播感染风险干预措施:一项随机对照试验
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 May;159(5):440-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.5.440.
6
Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial.针对非裔美国少女的艾滋病预防干预措施的效果:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2004 Jul 14;292(2):171-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.171.
7
Evaluation of an HIV/STD sexual risk-reduction intervention for pregnant African American adolescents attending a prenatal clinic in an urban public hospital: preliminary evidence of efficacy.对在城市公立医院产前诊所就诊的非裔美国孕妇青少年进行的艾滋病毒/性传播疾病性风险降低干预措施的评估:疗效的初步证据。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010 Feb;23(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
8
Abstinence and safer sex HIV risk-reduction interventions for African American adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.针对非裔美国青少年的禁欲和安全性行为降低艾滋病病毒风险干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1529-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1529.
9
Effects on sexual risk behavior and STD rate of brief HIV/STD prevention interventions for African American women in primary care settings.在初级保健机构中,针对非裔美国女性的简短HIV/性传播感染预防干预措施对性风险行为和性传播感染率的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jun;97(6):1034-40. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.020271. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
10
A STD/HIV prevention trial among adolescents in managed care.一项针对管理式医疗中青少年的性传播疾病/艾滋病预防试验。
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1):107-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.1.107.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of preconception care and periconception interventions on maternal nutritional status and birth outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.孕前保健和围孕期干预措施对低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇营养状况及分娩结局的影响:一项系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;17(2):e1156. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1156. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
What is the added value of incorporating pleasure in sexual health interventions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.将愉悦感融入性健康干预措施有何附加价值?系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 11;17(2):e0261034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261034. eCollection 2022.
3
The geographic reach of community-based organizations in addressing HIV-related stigma in the Deep South.社区组织在解决美国南部腹地艾滋病相关污名问题上的地域覆盖范围。
AIDS Care. 2022 Jan;34(1):60-68. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1978379. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Complex solutions for a complex problem: A meta-analysis of the efficacy of multiple-behavior interventions on change in outcomes related to HIV.复杂问题的复杂解决方案:多项行为干预对与艾滋病病毒相关结局变化效果的荟萃分析
Health Psychol. 2021 Sep;40(9):642-653. doi: 10.1037/hea0001088. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
HIV/AIDS Awareness Among Young Adults in Hong Kong: The Roles of Knowledge, Acceptance and Stigma.香港青年对艾滋病/艾滋病病毒的认识:知识、接受和污名的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;18(14):7473. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147473.
6
Targeted High-Risk Youth in Missouri PREP: Understanding Program Impacts on Youth Sexual Behavior Intentions.密苏里州针对高危青少年的预防计划(PREP):了解该计划对青少年性行为意图的影响。
Child Youth Care Forum. 2021 Jun;50(3):415-435. doi: 10.1007/s10566-020-09580-3. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
7
Association of Sexual Health Interventions With Sexual Health Outcomes in Black Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.性健康干预与黑人青少年性健康结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Jul 1;174(7):676-689. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0382.
8
Brief Motivational Interviewing Delivered by Clinician or Computer to Reduce Sexual Risk Behaviors in Adolescents: Acceptability Study.临床医生或计算机进行的简短动机性访谈以降低青少年性风险行为:可接受性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 10;21(7):e13220. doi: 10.2196/13220.
9
Results from e-KISS: electronic-KIOSK Intervention for Safer Sex: A pilot randomized controlled trial of an interactive computer-based intervention for sexual health in adolescents and young adults.e-KISS 研究结果:电子信息亭安全性行为干预——一项针对青少年和年轻成年人性健康的交互式计算机为基础的干预措施的试点随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0209064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209064. eCollection 2019.
10
Using Media Literacy Education for Adolescent Sexual Health Promotion in Middle School: Randomized Control Trial of Media Aware.利用媒体素养教育促进中学青少年性健康:媒体意识的随机对照试验。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(12):1051-1063. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1548669. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevention of sexually transmitted HIV infection: A meta-analytic review of teh behavioral outcome literature.预防性传播 HIV 感染:行为结果文献的荟萃分析综述。
Ann Behav Med. 1996 Mar;18(1):6-15. doi: 10.1007/BF02903934.
2
A randomized controlled trial testing an HIV prevention intervention for Latino youth.一项针对拉丁裔青少年的艾滋病预防干预措施的随机对照试验。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Aug;160(8):772-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.8.772.
3
HIV/STD risk reduction interventions for African American and Latino adolescent girls at an adolescent medicine clinic: a randomized controlled trial.青少年医学诊所针对非裔美国和拉丁裔少女的降低HIV/性传播感染风险干预措施:一项随机对照试验
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 May;159(5):440-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.5.440.
4
Distance communication transfer of HIV prevention interventions to service providers.向服务提供者远程通信传输艾滋病病毒预防干预措施。
Science. 2004 Sep 24;305(5692):1953-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1100733.
5
Efficacy of an HIV prevention intervention for African American adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial.针对非裔美国少女的艾滋病预防干预措施的效果:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2004 Jul 14;292(2):171-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.2.171.
6
Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000.2000年美国青少年性传播疾病:发病率及流行率估计
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):6-10. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.6.04.
7
Condom effectiveness for reducing transmission of gonorrhea and chlamydia: the importance of assessing partner infection status.避孕套在减少淋病和衣原体传播方面的有效性:评估性伴侣感染状况的重要性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Feb 1;159(3):242-51. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh044.
8
If HIV prevention works, why are rates of high-risk sexual behavior increasing among MSM?如果艾滋病病毒预防措施有效,为什么男男性行为者中的高危性行为发生率还在上升?
AIDS Educ Prev. 2003 Aug;15(4):294-308. doi: 10.1521/aeap.15.5.294.23825.
9
Interventions to reduce sexual risk for the human immunodeficiency virus in adolescents, 1985-2000: a research synthesis.1985 - 2000年青少年中降低感染人类免疫缺陷病毒性风险的干预措施:一项研究综述。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Apr;157(4):381-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.4.381.
10
Building partnerships to respond to HIV/AIDS: non-governmental organizations and universities.建立应对艾滋病毒/艾滋病的伙伴关系:非政府组织与大学
AIDS. 2002 Dec;16 Suppl 3:S76-82. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200212003-00011.

社区组织实施的青少年艾滋病/性传播感染预防干预的效果:一项集群随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention for adolescents when implemented by community-based organizations: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, Center for Health Behavior and Communication Research, Philadelphia, PA. 19104-3309, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr;100(4):720-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.140657. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2008.140657
PMID:20167903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2836337/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effectiveness of an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention when implemented by community-based organizations (CBOs).

METHODS

In a cluster-randomized controlled trial, 86 CBOs that served African American adolescents aged 13 to 18 years were randomized to implement either an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention whose efficacy has been demonstrated or a health-promotion control intervention. CBOs agreed to implement 6 intervention groups, a random half of which completed 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up assessments. The primary outcome was consistent condom use in the 3 months prior to each follow-up assessment, averaged over the follow-up assessments.

RESULTS

Participants were 1707 adolescents, 863 in HIV/STD-intervention CBOs and 844 in control-intervention CBOs. HIV/STD-intervention participants were more likely to report consistent condom use (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06, 1.84) than were control-intervention participants. HIV/STD-intervention participants also reported a greater proportion of condom-protected intercourse (beta = 0.06; 95% CI = 0.00, 0.12) than did the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first large, randomized intervention trial to demonstrate that CBOs can successfully implement an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention whose efficacy has been established.

摘要

目的

我们评估了社区组织(CBO)实施的 HIV/STD 风险降低干预的效果。

方法

在一项集群随机对照试验中,86 个服务于 13 至 18 岁非洲裔美国青少年的 CBO 被随机分配实施已经证明有效的 HIV/STD 风险降低干预或健康促进对照干预。CBO 同意实施 6 个干预组,其中随机一半完成 3、6 和 12 个月的随访评估。主要结局是在每次随访评估前的 3 个月内持续使用避孕套,随访评估期间平均计算。

结果

参与者为 1707 名青少年,HIV/STD 干预 CBO 组 863 名,对照组 CBO 组 844 名。HIV/STD 干预组参与者报告持续使用避孕套的可能性更高(比值比 [OR] = 1.39;95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.06,1.84),而对照组参与者报告的可能性较低。HIV/STD 干预组参与者报告的避孕套保护性行为比例也更高(β = 0.06;95%CI = 0.00,0.12),而对照组参与者报告的比例较低。

结论

这是第一个大规模、随机干预试验,证明 CBO 可以成功实施已证明有效的 HIV/STD 风险降低干预。