Wagenaar A C, Holder H D
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
J Stud Alcohol. 1991 Mar;52(2):162-73. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.162.
Several proposals to change the existing structure of state alcoholic beverage control authorities have been advanced over the past 10 years in the United States. Most call for eliminating or substantially reducing the state's role in retail sales of alcohol, particularly distilled spirits and wines. In recent years the states of Iowa and West Virginia eliminated state monopolies for retail sales of wine, and now allow such sales by privately-owned licensed establishments. Using time-series methods, we assessed the effects of these policy changes on the alcoholic beverage market in each state. Privatization was associated with statistically significant increases in wine sales in Iowa and West Virginia, after controlling for an initial stocking effect and broader nationwide trends in alcohol sales in the 1980s. In addition, there was a net increase in absolute alcohol consumed in both states across all beverages (beer, wine and distilled spirits) associated with privatization.
在过去十年里,美国提出了几项改革州酒精饮料管制机构现有结构的提议。大多数提议要求消除或大幅减少州政府在酒精饮料零售方面的作用,尤其是在蒸馏酒和葡萄酒的零售方面。近年来,爱荷华州和西弗吉尼亚州取消了葡萄酒零售的州垄断,现在允许私人持牌机构进行此类销售。我们使用时间序列方法评估了这些政策变化对每个州酒精饮料市场的影响。在控制了初始库存效应和20世纪80年代全国范围内更广泛的酒精销售趋势后,私有化与爱荷华州和西弗吉尼亚州葡萄酒销量的统计显著增加相关。此外,与私有化相关的是,这两个州所有饮料(啤酒、葡萄酒和蒸馏酒)的纯酒精消费净增加。