Unité de Recherche 77 Paludologie Afro-tropicale, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) and Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Paludisme, Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), BP 288, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Malar J. 2010 Feb 19;9:56. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-56.
The use of drug combinations, including non-artemisinin-based and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), is a novel strategy that enhances therapeutic efficacy and delays the emergence of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Its use is strongly recommended in most sub-Saharan African countries, namely Cameroon, where resistance to chloroquine is widespread and antifolate resistance is emerging.
Studies were conducted in Cameroonian children with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria according to the standard World Health Organization protocol at four sentinel sites between 2003 and 2007. A total of 1,401 children were enrolled, of whom 1,337 were assigned to randomized studies and 64 were included in a single non-randomized study. The proportions of adequate clinical and parasitological response (PCR-uncorrected on day 14 and PCR-corrected on day 28) were the primary endpoints to evaluate treatment efficacy on day 14 and day 28. The relative effectiveness of drug combinations was compared by a multi-treatment Bayesian random-effect meta-analysis.
The results based on the meta-analysis suggested that artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) is as effective as other drugs (artesunate-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine [AS-SP], artesunate-chlorproguanil-dapsone [AS-CD], artesunate-mefloquine [AS-MQ], dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine [DH-PP], artemether-lumefantrine [AM-LM], amodiaquine, and amodiaquine-sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine [AQ-SP]). AM-LM appeared to be the most effective with no treatment failure due to recrudescence, closely followed by DH-PP.
Although AM-LM requires six doses, rather than three doses for other artemisinin-based combinations, it has potential advantages over other forms of ACT. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerance of these combinations in different epidemiological context.
药物联合使用,包括非青蒿素类和青蒿素类联合疗法(ACT),是一种增强治疗效果和延缓出现多药耐药恶性疟原虫的新策略。该策略在大多数撒哈拉以南非洲国家,包括广泛存在氯喹耐药和抗叶酸耐药现象的喀麦隆,得到了强烈推荐。
2003 年至 2007 年,在喀麦隆四个哨点,根据世界卫生组织标准方案,对患有急性无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的儿童进行了研究。共有 1401 名儿童入组,其中 1337 名被分配到随机研究,64 名被纳入一项非随机研究。14 天和 28 天未校正和校正后的寄生虫学和临床应答率(PCR)是评估治疗效果的主要终点。采用多治疗贝叶斯随机效应荟萃分析比较药物联合治疗的相对疗效。
基于荟萃分析的结果表明,青蒿琥酯-阿莫地喹(AS-AQ)与其他药物(青蒿琥酯-磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶[AS-SP]、青蒿琥酯-氯胍-氨苯砜[AS-CD]、青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹[AS-MQ]、双氢青蒿素-哌喹[DH-PP]、青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹[AS-MQ]、蒿甲醚-本芴醇[AM-LM]、阿莫地喹和阿莫地喹-磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶[AQ-SP])同样有效。AM-LM 似乎是最有效的,没有因复发而导致治疗失败,紧随其后的是 DH-PP。
尽管 AM-LM 需要 6 剂,而不是其他青蒿素类联合疗法的 3 剂,但它在疗效方面优于其他形式的 ACT。需要进一步研究来评估这些组合在不同流行病学环境下的临床疗效和耐受性。