Suppr超能文献

肥厚型心肌病间隔酒精消融与心肌切除术的更新荟萃分析。

Updated meta-analysis of septal alcohol ablation versus myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):823-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.047.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies to compare outcomes of septal ablation (SA) with septal myectomy (SM) for treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).

BACKGROUND

SM is considered the gold standard for treatment of HOCM. However, SA has emerged as an attractive therapeutic alternative.

METHODS

A Medline search using standard terms was conducted to determine eligible studies. Due to a lack of randomized control trials, we included observational studies for review.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were found eligible for review. No significant differences between short-term (risk difference [RD]: 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.01 to 0.03) and long-term mortality (RD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.09) were found between the SA and SM groups. In addition, no significant differences could be found in terms of post-intervention functional status as well as improvement in New York Heart Association functional class, ventricular arrhythmia occurrence, re-interventions performed, and post-procedure mitral regurgitation. However, SA was found to increase the risk of right bundle branch block (RBBB) (pooled odds ratio [OR]: 56.3; 95% CI: 11.6 to 273.9) along with need for permanent pacemaker implantation post-procedure (pooled OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.7 to 3.9). Although the efficacy of both SA and SM in left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) reduction seems comparable, there is a small yet significantly higher residual LVOTG amongst the SA group patients as compared with the SM group patients.

CONCLUSION

SA does seem to show promise in treatment of HOCM owing to similar mortality rates as well as functional status compared with SM; however, the caveat is increased conduction abnormalities and a higher post-intervention LVOTG. The choice of treatment strategy should be made after a thorough discussion of the procedures with the individual patient.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对比较研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以比较间隔消融(SA)与间隔心肌切除术(SM)治疗肥厚型梗阻性心肌病(HOCM)的结果。

背景

SM 被认为是治疗 HOCM 的金标准。然而,SA 已成为一种有吸引力的治疗选择。

方法

使用标准术语进行 Medline 搜索以确定合格的研究。由于缺乏随机对照试验,我们纳入了观察性研究进行综述。

结果

共发现 12 项符合条件的研究。SA 和 SM 组之间的短期死亡率(风险差异 [RD]:0.01;95%置信区间 [CI]:-0.01 至 0.03)和长期死亡率(RD:0.02;95%CI:-0.05 至 0.09)均无显著差异。此外,干预后功能状态以及纽约心脏协会功能分级、室性心律失常发生、再次干预和术后二尖瓣反流的改善方面也无显著差异。然而,SA 增加了右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)的风险(合并优势比 [OR]:56.3;95%CI:11.6 至 273.9),并且术后需要永久性起搏器植入(合并 OR:2.6;95%CI:1.7 至 3.9)。尽管 SA 和 SM 在降低左心室流出道梯度(LVOTG)方面的疗效似乎相似,但 SA 组患者的残余 LVOTG 略高且具有统计学意义。

结论

由于与 SM 相比,SA 的死亡率和功能状态相似,因此 SA 似乎在治疗 HOCM 方面显示出一定的前景;然而,缺点是传导异常增加和术后 LVOTG 升高。在与患者充分讨论后,应选择治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验