Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 560 First Ave., TCH-HW202, New York, NY 10016, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Mar;194(3):634-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2994.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to qualitatively and quantitatively compare image quality of a time-efficient 3D T2-weighted sequence-the sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) sequence-with a standard 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence for liver imaging at 3 T.
Twenty patients underwent liver MRI at 3 T using T2-weighted breath-hold 2D TSE and respiratory-triggered SPACE sequences. Two radiologists independently assessed image quality for both sequences during separate sessions, followed by a side-by-side comparison. One reader performed a quantitative analysis of the estimated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the relative contrast between the liver and other tissues.
Image quality scores for the SPACE sequence were significantly better than those for the 2D TSE sequence for motion (p < 0.0001) and pulsation (p < 0.0001) artifact, flow signal suppression (p = 0.0015), sharpness of intrahepatic vessels (p < 0.0001), and sharpness of liver edge (p = 0.0015), with motion and pulsation artifacts being nearly eliminated using the SPACE sequence. However, the scores for B(1) inhomogeneity artifact were significantly worse for the SPACE sequence (p = 0.0117). Overall, both readers preferred SPACE sequence, although this difference was significant for only one reader (p = 0.025, p = 0.275). There was no significant difference between the sequences for estimated liver SNR (p = 0.1564), but the SPACE sequence showed significantly higher relative contrast between the liver and the kidney (p < 0.0001), gallbladder (p = 0.0476), and spleen (p < 0.0001). Relative contrast between the liver and parenchymal lesions was higher with the SPACE sequence than with the TSE sequence, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.125).
For T2-weighted liver imaging at 3 T, the respiratory-triggered SPACE sequence shows better image quality with near elimination of motion and pulsation artifacts and improved tissue contrast than the breath-hold 2D TSE sequence, but suffers from increased B(1) inhomogeneity artifact and longer scanning time.
本回顾性研究旨在定性和定量比较在 3T 下使用时间效率高的 3D T2 加权序列——采样完美应用优化对比各向异性翻转角演化(SPACE)序列与标准 2D T2 加权涡轮自旋回波(TSE)序列进行肝脏成像的图像质量。
20 例患者在 3T 下使用呼吸门控 2D TSE 和呼吸触发 SPACE 序列进行 T2 加权磁共振成像。两名放射科医生在单独的时段内分别对两种序列的图像质量进行独立评估,然后进行并排比较。一名读者对估计的信噪比(SNR)和肝脏与其他组织之间的相对对比度进行了定量分析。
SPACE 序列的图像质量评分在运动(p<0.0001)和搏动(p<0.0001)伪影、流动信号抑制(p=0.0015)、肝内血管清晰度(p<0.0001)和肝边缘清晰度(p=0.0015)方面明显优于 2D TSE 序列,运动和搏动伪影几乎消除。然而,SPACE 序列的 B1 不均匀伪影评分明显较差(p=0.0117)。总的来说,两位读者都更喜欢 SPACE 序列,尽管只有一位读者的差异有统计学意义(p=0.025,p=0.275)。两种序列的估计肝 SNR 无显著差异(p=0.1564),但 SPACE 序列显示肝与肾(p<0.0001)、胆囊(p=0.0476)和脾(p<0.0001)之间的相对对比度明显更高。SPACE 序列显示的肝与实质病变之间的相对对比度高于 TSE 序列,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.125)。
在 3T 下进行 T2 加权肝脏成像时,与呼吸门控 2D TSE 序列相比,呼吸触发 SPACE 序列的运动和搏动伪影几乎消除,组织对比度提高,图像质量更好,但 B1 不均匀伪影增加,扫描时间延长。