Suppr超能文献

循证医学的风险

Perils of evidence-based medicine.

作者信息

Williams Ben A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Biol Med. 2010 Winter;53(1):106-20. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0132.

Abstract

Evidenced-based medicine views random-assignment clinical trials as the gold standard of evidence. Because patient populations are heterogeneous, large numbers of patients must be studied in order to achieve statistically significant results, but the means or medians of these large samples have weak predictive validity for individual patients. Further, the logic of random-assignment clinical trials allows only the inference that some subset of patients benefits from the treatment. Post-hoc analysis is therefore necessary to identify those patients. Otherwise, many patients may receive treatments that are useless and potentially harmful.

摘要

循证医学将随机分配临床试验视为证据的金标准。由于患者群体具有异质性,必须研究大量患者才能获得具有统计学意义的结果,但这些大样本的均值或中位数对个体患者的预测效度较弱。此外,随机分配临床试验的逻辑仅允许推断出某些患者亚组从治疗中获益。因此,需要进行事后分析来识别这些患者。否则,许多患者可能会接受无用且可能有害的治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验