• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进戒烟的公共政策。

Public policy to maximize tobacco cessation.

机构信息

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Washington DC 20005, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3 Suppl):S327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.017
PMID:20176304
Abstract

Tobacco use kills more than 400,000 Americans every year. For smokers, quitting is the biggest step they can take to improve their health, but it is a difficult step. Fortunately, policy-based interventions can both encourage smokers to quit and help them succeed. Evidence shows that tobacco tax increases encourage smokers to quit-recent state and federal increases have created dramatic surges in calls to quitlines. Similarly, smokefree workplace laws not only protect workers and patrons from secondhand smoke but also encourage smokers to quit, help them succeed, and create a social environment less conducive to smoking. The impact of policy changes can be amplified by promoting quitting around the date they are implemented. Outreach to health practitioners can alert them to encourage their patients to quit. Earned and paid media can also be used to motivate smokers to quit when policy changes are put into effect. Although these policies and efforts regarding them can generate great demand for evidence-based cessation services such as counseling and medication, it is important to make these resources available for those wanting to quit. Public and private health insurance plans should provide coverage for cessation services, and states should invest tobacco tax and/or tobacco settlement dollars in smoking-cessation programs as recommended by the CDC. Finally, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act has given the U.S. Food and Drug Administration new authority to regulate tobacco products and marketing, and to prevent tobacco companies from deceptively marketing new products that discourage smokers from quitting and keep them addicted.

摘要

烟草使用每年导致超过 40 万美国人死亡。对于吸烟者来说,戒烟是改善健康的最大一步,但这是一个艰难的步骤。幸运的是,基于政策的干预措施既可以鼓励吸烟者戒烟,又可以帮助他们成功。有证据表明,提高烟草税会鼓励吸烟者戒烟——最近州和联邦政府的提税导致戒烟热线的呼叫量急剧增加。同样,无烟工作场所法律不仅保护工人和顾客免受二手烟的危害,还鼓励吸烟者戒烟,帮助他们成功戒烟,并营造一个不利于吸烟的社会环境。通过在政策实施之日前后宣传戒烟,可以放大政策变化的影响。向卫生保健从业者提供信息可以提醒他们鼓励其患者戒烟。付费和免费媒体也可以用于在实施政策变化时激励吸烟者戒烟。尽管这些政策以及围绕它们的努力可能会对基于证据的戒烟服务(如咨询和药物治疗)产生巨大需求,但为那些想要戒烟的人提供这些资源很重要。公共和私人健康保险计划应提供戒烟服务的覆盖范围,并且各州应按照疾病预防控制中心的建议,投资烟草税和/或烟草和解金用于戒烟计划。最后,《家庭吸烟预防和烟草控制法》赋予美国食品和药物管理局新的权力来监管烟草产品和营销,并防止烟草公司欺骗性地推销新产品,这些产品会阻止吸烟者戒烟并使他们上瘾。

相似文献

1
Public policy to maximize tobacco cessation.促进戒烟的公共政策。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Mar;38(3 Suppl):S327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.017.
2
Increasing the demand for and use of effective smoking-cessation treatments reaping the full health benefits of tobacco-control science and policy gains--in our lifetime.在我们有生之年,增加对有效戒烟治疗的需求并加以利用,从而充分收获烟草控制科学和政策成果带来的健康益处。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6 Suppl):S340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.003.
3
Current tobacco control policy trends in the United States.美国当前的烟草控制政策趋势。
Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006;5(1):85-99, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2005.10.006.
4
The relationship of smoking cessation to sociodemographic characteristics, smoking intensity, and tobacco control policies.戒烟与社会人口学特征、吸烟强度及烟草控制政策的关系。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Jun;7(3):387-96. doi: 10.1080/14622200500125443.
5
Snuffing out cigarette sales and the smoking deaths epidemic.杜绝香烟销售与吸烟致死的流行趋势。
N Z Med J. 2007 Jun 15;120(1256):U2587.
6
Can strategies used by statewide tobacco control programs help smokers make progress in quitting?全州范围的烟草控制项目所采用的策略能否帮助吸烟者在戒烟方面取得进展?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998 Jun;7(6):459-64.
7
Tobacco industry marketing, population-based tobacco control, and smoking behavior.烟草行业营销、基于人群的烟草控制与吸烟行为。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6 Suppl):S327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.007.
8
Use of four major tobacco control interventions in New Zealand: a review.新西兰四大烟草控制干预措施的应用:一项综述。
N Z Med J. 2008 Jun 20;121(1276):71-86.
9
Use of cessation methods among smokers aged 16-24 years--United States, 2003.2003年美国16至24岁吸烟者戒烟方法的使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006 Dec 22;55(50):1351-4.
10
[A review of the evidence based smoking cessation interventions delivered by the family physician].[家庭医生实施的基于证据的戒烟干预措施综述]
Harefuah. 2005 Oct;144(10):724-8, 750, 749.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional and social disparities in cessation behavior and motivation to quit among U.S. adult current smokers, Tobacco Use Supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey 2014-15 and 2018-19.美国成年当前吸烟者戒烟行为和戒烟动机的地区和社会差异,美国人口普查局 2014-15 年和 2018-19 年的“美国人口普查局当前人口调查中的烟草使用补充调查”。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 30;12:1416096. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1416096. eCollection 2024.
2
Alternative Tobacco Product Use and Smoking Quit Attempts Among Teenagers in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study.美国青少年使用替代烟草产品及戒烟尝试情况:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2021 Jul 29;13(7):e16740. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16740. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Health-Information Seeking and Intention to Quit Smoking: Do Health Beliefs Have a Mediating Role?
健康信息寻求与戒烟意愿:健康信念是否具有中介作用?
Tob Use Insights. 2019 Aug 27;12:1179173X19871310. doi: 10.1177/1179173X19871310. eCollection 2019.
4
Public Health Policy in Support of Insurance Coverage for Smoking Cessation Treatments.支持戒烟治疗保险覆盖范围的公共卫生政策。
Healthc Policy. 2017 May;12(4):56-68. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2017.25098.
5
Installation Tobacco Control Programs in the U.S. Military.在美国军队中实施烟草控制项目。
Mil Med. 2016 Jun;181(6):596-601. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00313.
6
Update on Performance in Tobacco Control: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Tobacco Control Policy and the US Adult Smoking Rate, 2011-2013.烟草控制绩效最新情况:2011 - 2013年烟草控制政策影响及美国成年人吸烟率的纵向分析
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):E29-35. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000358.
7
Using a health informatics system to assess effect of a federal cigarette tax increase on readiness to quit among low-income smokers, Louisiana, 2009.利用健康信息学系统评估联邦提高香烟税对低收入吸烟者戒烟准备情况的影响,路易斯安那州,2009 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Apr 4;11:E52. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130203.
8
A novel approach to estimating the prevalence of untaxed cigarettes in the USA: findings from the 2009 and 2010 international tobacco control surveys.一种估算美国未征税香烟流行率的新方法:2009年和2010年国际烟草控制调查的结果
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i61-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051038. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
9
Cigarette price minimization strategies in the United States: price reductions and responsiveness to excise taxes.美国的香烟价格最小化策略:价格降低和对消费税的反应。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Nov;15(11):1858-66. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt068. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
10
Strong tobacco control program requirements and secure funding are not enough: lessons from Florida.强有力的烟草控制项目要求和充足的资金保障还不够:来自佛罗里达州的经验教训。
Am J Public Health. 2012 May;102(5):807-17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300459. Epub 2012 Mar 15.