Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, V.le R. Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2010 Jun;115(4):634-47. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0535-y. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
The authors performed a preliminary study with blood-pool contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating the degree of carotid artery stenosis and plaque morphology, comparing the diagnostic performance of first-pass (FP) and steady-state (SS) acquisitions with 64-slice computed tomography angiography (CTA) and using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.
Twenty patients with >or=50% carotid artery stenosis at Doppler sonography underwent blood-pool contrast-enhanced MRA, CTA and DSA. Two independent radiologists evaluated MRA and CTA examinations to assess the degree of stenosis and characterise plaque morphology. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for FP, SS and CTA. The McNemar and Wilcoxon tests were used to determine significant differences (p<0.05) between the diagnostic performance of the three modalities.
Forty carotid bifurcations were studied. For stenosis grading, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 90%, 89%, 90%, 89% and 90%, respectively, at FP; 95%, 95%, 95%, 95% and 95%, respectively, at SS; and 97.5%, 95%, 100%, 100% and 95%, respectively, at CTA. SS and CTA were superior to FP for evaluating the degree of stenosis (p<0.05). For evaluating plaque morphology, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 87.5%, 89%, 86%, 85% and 90%, respectively, at FP; 97.5%, 100%, 95%, 95% and 100%, respectively, at SS; and 100%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively, at CTA. There were no significant differences between FP, SS and CTA for plaque assessment (p>0.05).
Blood-pool contrast-enhanced MRA with SS sequences allow improved diagnostic evaluation of the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology compared with FP and is substantially equal to CTA and DSA.
作者使用血池对比增强磁共振血管成像(MRA)初步研究了颈动脉狭窄程度和斑块形态,比较了单次通过(FP)和稳态(SS)采集与 64 层 CT 血管造影(CTA)的诊断性能,并以数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为参考标准。
20 例经多普勒超声检查发现>或=50%颈动脉狭窄的患者接受了血池对比增强 MRA、CTA 和 DSA 检查。两名独立的放射科医生评估了 MRA 和 CTA 检查结果,以评估狭窄程度和斑块形态特征。计算 FP、SS 和 CTA 的准确性、敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。采用 McNemar 和 Wilcoxon 检验确定三种模态诊断性能的显著差异(p<0.05)。
共研究了 40 个颈动脉分叉处。对于狭窄分级,FP 的准确性、敏感度、特异度、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 90%、89%、90%、89%和 90%;SS 分别为 95%、95%、95%、95%和 95%;CTA 分别为 97.5%、95%、100%、100%和 95%。SS 和 CTA 在评估狭窄程度方面优于 FP(p<0.05)。对于评估斑块形态,FP 的准确性、敏感度、特异度、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 87.5%、89%、86%、85%和 90%;SS 分别为 97.5%、100%、95%、95%和 100%;CTA 分别为 100%、100%、100%、100%和 100%。FP、SS 和 CTA 在评估斑块方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。
与 FP 相比,SS 序列的血池对比增强 MRA 可改善颈动脉狭窄程度和斑块形态的诊断评估,与 CTA 和 DSA 基本相当。