Educational Psychology and Special Education, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-3979, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;43(2):139-53. doi: 10.1177/0022219409359344.
This study examined whether measurement constructs behind reading-related tests for struggling adult readers are similar to what is known about measurement constructs for children. The sample included 371 adults reading between the third-and fifth-grade levels, including 127 men and 153 English speakers of other languages. Using measures of skills and subskills, confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to test child-based theoretical measurement models of reading: an achievement model of reading skills, a core deficit model of reading subskills, and an integrated model containing achievement and deficit variables. Although the findings present the best measurement models, the contribution of this article is the description of the difficulties encountered when applying child-based assumptions to developing measurement models for struggling adult readers.
本研究旨在考察阅读相关测试背后的测量结构是否与儿童的测量结构相似。样本包括 371 名阅读水平在三至五年级之间的成年人,其中 127 名男性和 153 名英语为其他语言的人。使用技能和子技能的测量方法,进行了验证性因子分析,以测试基于儿童的阅读理论测量模型:阅读技能的成就模型、阅读子技能的核心缺陷模型,以及包含成就和缺陷变量的综合模型。尽管研究结果提出了最佳的测量模型,但本文的贡献在于描述了将基于儿童的假设应用于为有阅读困难的成年读者开发测量模型时所遇到的困难。