Sabatini John P, Shore Jane, Holtzman Steven, Scarborough Hollis S
Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
J Res Educ Eff. 2011;4(2):118-13. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2011.555290.
To compare the efficacy of instructional programs for adult learners with basic reading skills below the seventh grade level, 300 adults were randomly assigned to one of three supplementary tutoring programs designed to strengthen decoding and fluency skills, and gains were examined for the 148 adult students who completed the program. The three intervention programs were based on or adapted from instructional programs that have been shown to benefit children with reading levels similar to those of the adult sample. Each program varied in its relative emphasis on basic decoding versus reading fluency instruction. A repeated measures MANOVA confirmed small to moderate reading gains from pre- to post-testing across a battery of targeted reading measures, but no significant relative differences across interventions. An additional 152 participants who failed to complete the intervention differed initially from those who persisted. Implications for future research and adult literacy instruction are discussed.
为比较针对七年级以下基础阅读技能的成年学习者的教学项目的效果,300名成年人被随机分配到三个旨在强化解码和流利度技能的补充辅导项目之一,并对完成该项目的148名成年学生的学习成果进行了评估。这三个干预项目基于或改编自已被证明对阅读水平与成年样本相似的儿童有益的教学项目。每个项目在对基本解码与阅读流利度教学的相对侧重上有所不同。一项重复测量多元方差分析证实,在一系列目标阅读测试中,从测试前到测试后有小到中等程度的阅读进步,但各干预项目之间没有显著的相对差异。另外152名未完成干预的参与者最初与坚持下来的参与者有所不同。文中讨论了对未来研究和成人扫盲教学的启示。