Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5053, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;43(2):166-8. doi: 10.1177/0022219409359346.
The four studies of adult literacy in this special issue of the Journal of Learning Disabilities address measurement issues in adult populations and the relation (by comparison) of similar studies of childhood literacy. Despite differences in selection criteria, tests, and research questions, there is some convergence across studies, especially on construct validity issues. It is reassuring to see evidence of construct invariance across children and adults. The examples of lack of convergence relative to childhood literacy studies are instructive, and investigators should be careful not to extrapolate directly from child to adult models.
本期《学习障碍杂志》中的四项成人扫盲研究探讨了成人人群中的测量问题,以及类似的儿童扫盲研究的关系(通过比较)。尽管在选择标准、测试和研究问题上存在差异,但各研究之间存在一定的趋同,尤其是在构念效度问题上。看到儿童和成人之间存在构念不变性的证据令人感到欣慰。与儿童扫盲研究相比,缺乏一致性的例子具有启发性,研究人员应注意不要直接将儿童模型外推至成人模型。