Suppr超能文献

贝叶斯因子在复杂遗传学中的应用。

Bayes factors in complex genetics.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jul;18(7):746-50. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.17. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

Abstract

The past few years have seen tremendous progress in our understanding of the genetics underlying complex disease, with associated variants being identified in dozens of traits. Despite the fact that this growing body of empirical evidence unequivocally shows the necessity for extreme levels of significance and large samples sizes, the reasoning behind these requirements is not always appreciated. As genome-wide association studies reach the limits of their resolution in the search for rarer and weaker effects, the need for appropriate design and interpretation will become ever more important. If the genetic analysis of complex disease is to avoid accumulating false positive claims, as it has in the past, then researchers will need to allow for less tangible variables such as power and prior odds rather than relying exclusively on significance when assessing the results of these studies. In this review, the basic foundations of association testing are explained from a Bayesian perspective and the potential benefits of Bayes factors as a means of measuring the weight of evidence in support of an association are described.

摘要

在过去的几年中,我们对复杂疾病遗传基础的理解取得了巨大的进展,相关的变异在数十种特征中被确定。尽管越来越多的经验证据明确表明需要极高的显著性水平和大样本量,但这些要求的背后原因并不总是被理解。随着全基因组关联研究在寻找更罕见和更弱的效应时达到其分辨率的极限,适当的设计和解释将变得更加重要。如果要避免遗传分析复杂疾病像过去那样积累虚假阳性结果,那么研究人员将需要考虑到力量和先验概率等不太明显的变量,而不仅仅是在评估这些研究结果时仅依赖于显著性。在这篇综述中,从贝叶斯的角度解释了关联测试的基本基础,并描述了贝叶斯因子作为衡量支持关联证据权重的一种方法的潜在好处。

相似文献

1
Bayes factors in complex genetics.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jul;18(7):746-50. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.17. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
2
An Empirical Bayes Mixture Model for Effect Size Distributions in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
PLoS Genet. 2015 Dec 29;11(12):e1005717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005717. eCollection 2015 Dec.
3
Bayes factors for genome-wide association studies: comparison with P-values.
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;33(1):79-86. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20359.
4
[Current status of SNPs interaction in genome-wide association study].
Yi Chuan. 2011 Sep;33(9):901-10. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1005.2011.00901.
5
Methods for combining multiple genome-wide linkage studies.
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;620:541-60. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-580-4_21.
6
LPG: A four-group probabilistic approach to leveraging pleiotropy in genome-wide association studies.
BMC Genomics. 2018 Jun 28;19(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4851-2.
8
Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences.
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):322-339. doi: 10.1037/met0000061. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

2
External Replication of Urinary Bladder Cancer Prognostic Polymorphisms in the UK Biobank.
Front Oncol. 2019 Oct 18;9:1082. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01082. eCollection 2019.
3
On the Null Distribution of Bayes Factors in Linear Regression.
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1362-1371. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1328361. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
[Epidemiology and causes of Parkinson's disease].
Nervenarzt. 2017 Apr;88(4):345-355. doi: 10.1007/s00115-017-0288-0.
5
Statistical analysis for genome-wide association study.
J Biomed Res. 2015 Jul;29(4):285-97. doi: 10.7555/JBR.29.20140007. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
8
Multiple sclerosis and the role of immune cells.
World J Exp Med. 2014 Aug 20;4(3):27-37. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v4.i3.27.
9
No association between apolipoprotein E or N-acetyltransferase 2 gene polymorphisms and age-related hearing loss.
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan;125(1):E33-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.24898. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
10
Trans-ethnic meta-analysis of white blood cell phenotypes.
Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Dec 20;23(25):6944-60. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu401. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction and interaction in complex disease genetics: experience in type 1 diabetes.
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000540. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
2
Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9362-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903103106. Epub 2009 May 27.
3
Bayes factors for genome-wide association studies: comparison with P-values.
Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;33(1):79-86. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20359.
4
The complex genetics of multiple sclerosis: pitfalls and prospects.
Brain. 2008 Dec;131(Pt 12):3118-31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn081. Epub 2008 May 18.
6
Estimation of significance thresholds for genomewide association scans.
Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;32(3):227-34. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20297.
8
A high-density screen for linkage in multiple sclerosis.
Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Sep;77(3):454-67. doi: 10.1086/444547. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
9
How many genes underlie the occurrence of common complex diseases in the population?
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;34(5):1129-37. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi130. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
10
Familial recurrence rates and genetic models of multiple sclerosis.
Am J Med Genet A. 2005 May 15;135(1):53-8. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30702.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验