• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倡导积极交通:倡导者和市议会的观点。

Advocacy for active transport: advocate and city council perspectives.

机构信息

Cancer Society Social and Behavioural Research in Cancer Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Jan 24;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-5.

DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-7-5
PMID:20181003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2830166/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective advocacy is an important part of efforts to increase population participation in physical activity. Research about effective health advocacy is scarce, however, the health sector can learn from the experiences and knowledge of community advocates and those who are on the receiving end of this advocacy. The aim of this study is to explore advocacy for active transport from the perspectives of community advocates and representatives from City councils.

METHODS

Cycling and walking advocates were identified from the local contact list of Cycling Advocates Network and Living Streets Aotearoa. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with cycle and walking advocates from throughout New Zealand. Advocates also nominated a suitable council officer at their local City council to be interviewed. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and categories of responses for each of the questions created.

RESULTS

Several processes were used by advocates to engage with council staff, including formal council submissions, meetings, stakeholder forums and partnership in running community events promoting active transport. Several other agencies were identified as being influential for active transport, some as potential coalition partners and others as potential adversaries. Barriers to improving conditions for active transport included a lack of funding, a lack of will-power among either council staff or councillors, limited council staff capacity (time or training) and a culture of providing infrastructure for motor vehicles instead of people. Several suggestions were made about how the health sector could contribute to advocacy efforts, including encouraging political commitment, engaging the media, communicating the potential health benefits of active transport to the general public and being role models in terms of personal travel mode choice and having workplaces that support participation in active transport.

CONCLUSIONS

There is potential for the health sector to make an important contribution to advocacy for active transport in New Zealand. While there are many barriers to achieving supportive environments for cycling and walking, a range of advocacy strategies were identified which could help ensure that health perspectives are considered in decisions relevant to active transport.

摘要

背景

有效的宣传是增加人口参与体育活动的努力的重要组成部分。然而,关于有效的健康宣传的研究很少,但是卫生部门可以从社区宣传者和那些接受这种宣传的人的经验和知识中学习。本研究的目的是从社区宣传者和市议会代表的角度探讨积极交通的宣传。

方法

从自行车宣传者网络和新西兰生活街道的当地联系人名单中确定了骑自行车和步行的宣传者。对来自新西兰各地的自行车和步行宣传者进行了半结构化电话采访。宣传者还提名了他们当地市议会的合适议会官员接受采访。采访进行了录音和转录,并为每个问题创建了类别响应。

结果

宣传者使用了几种程序与议会工作人员接触,包括正式的议会提交、会议、利益相关者论坛以及合作举办社区活动以促进积极的交通。还确定了其他几个机构对积极交通有影响,有些是潜在的联盟伙伴,有些是潜在的对手。改善积极交通条件的障碍包括缺乏资金、议会工作人员或议员缺乏意志力、议会工作人员能力(时间或培训)有限以及为机动车而不是人为基础设施提供文化。就卫生部门如何为宣传工作做出贡献提出了一些建议,包括鼓励政治承诺、利用媒体、向公众宣传积极交通的潜在健康益处以及在个人出行方式选择方面以身作则,并为参与积极交通提供工作场所。

结论

卫生部门有可能为新西兰积极交通的宣传做出重要贡献。虽然为骑自行车和步行创造支持性环境存在许多障碍,但已经确定了一系列宣传策略,可以帮助确保在与积极交通相关的决策中考虑健康视角。

相似文献

1
Advocacy for active transport: advocate and city council perspectives.倡导积极交通:倡导者和市议会的观点。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Jan 24;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-5.
2
Political activity for physical activity: health advocacy for active transport.倡导身体活动的政治活动:积极倡导使用主动交通方式促进健康。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 May 29;8:52. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-52.
3
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
4
Transport and health: en route to a healthier Australia?交通与健康:通往更健康澳大利亚之路?
Med J Aust. 2000 Mar 6;172(5):230-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb123918.x.
5
What Wellington region city councillors think of smokefree outdoor places.惠灵顿地区市议员对无烟户外场所的看法。
N Z Med J. 2008 Jun 20;121(1276):15-28.
6
Coordination, framing and innovation: the political sophistication of public health advocates in Ireland.协调、构建框架和创新:爱尔兰公共卫生倡导者的政治策略。
Addiction. 2021 Nov;116(11):3252-3260. doi: 10.1111/add.15404. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review.健康公平倡导:一项综合综述。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):392-437. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12112.
8
Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot.患者权益倡导者对参与卫生技术评估的看法:国际概览
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 10;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0052-9. eCollection 2017.
9
Planning for the next generation of public health advocates: evaluation of an online advocacy mentoring program.为下一代公共卫生倡导者做规划:一项在线倡导指导项目的评估
Health Promot J Austr. 2016 Apr;27(1):43-47. doi: 10.1071/HE15065.
10
Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (5 of 7): advocacy barriers and opportunities.全球早产儿和死产报告(七之五):倡导障碍与契机。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Feb 23;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S5.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between environmental characteristics and active commuting to school among children: a cross-sectional study.环境特征与儿童积极上学交通方式之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Int J Behav Med. 2013 Dec;20(4):538-55. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9271-0.
2
Health and the built environment: exploring foundations for a new interdisciplinary profession.健康与建筑环境:探索新跨学科专业的基础。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:958175. doi: 10.1155/2012/958175. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
3
Political activity for physical activity: health advocacy for active transport.倡导身体活动的政治活动:积极倡导使用主动交通方式促进健康。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 May 29;8:52. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-52.

本文引用的文献

1
'Tell us something we don't already know or do!' - The response of planning and transport professionals to public health guidance on the built environment and physical activity.“告诉我们一些我们还不知道或没做过的事情!”——规划和交通专业人士对关于建筑环境与身体活动的公共卫生指南的回应。
J Public Health Policy. 2009 Apr;30(1):102-16. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2008.43.
2
Creating and making the case: global advocacy for physical activity.提出并论证理由:全球范围内对体育活动的倡导
J Phys Act Health. 2008 Nov;5(6):765-76. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.6.765.
3
Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: a systematic review.儿童和青少年的积极学校交通、身体活动水平与体重:一项系统综述
Prev Med. 2009 Jan;48(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.017. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
4
Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review.主动通勤与心血管风险:一项荟萃分析综述
Prev Med. 2008 Jan;46(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 Mar 20.
5
The effect of walking on fitness, fatness and resting blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials.步行对体能、肥胖及静息血压的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2007 May;44(5):377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.12.008. Epub 2006 Dec 24.
6
Advocacy for physical activity--from evidence to influence.对体育活动的倡导——从证据到影响。
Promot Educ. 2006;13(2):118-26. doi: 10.1177/10253823060130020106.
7
Planning and implementing a community-based public health advocacy campaign: a transport case study from Australia.规划和实施基于社区的公共卫生宣传活动:澳大利亚的一个交通案例研究
Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21(4):284-92. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal027. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
8
Evidence based advocacy.循证宣传。
Inj Prev. 2004 Dec;10(6):324-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.006536.
9
Advocacy in public health: roles and challenges.公共卫生中的倡导:角色与挑战。
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Dec;30(6):1226-32. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.6.1226.
10
All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work.与休闲时间、工作、运动及骑车上班期间的体力活动相关的全因死亡率。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jun 12;160(11):1621-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1621.