Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Implement Sci. 2010 Jan 28;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-6.
Individuals with multiple relatives with colorectal cancer (CRC) and/or a relative with early-onset CRC have an increased risk of developing CRC. They are eligible for preventive measures, such as surveillance by regular colonoscopy and/or genetic counselling. Currently, most at-risk individuals do not follow the indicated follow-up policy. In a new guideline on familial and hereditary CRC, clinicians have new tasks in calculating, interpreting, and communicating familial CRC risk. This will lead to better recognition of individuals at an increased familial CRC risk, enabling them to take effective preventive measures. This trial compares two implementation strategies (a common versus an intensive implementation strategy), focussing on clinicians' risk calculation, interpretation, and communication, as well as patients' uptake of the indicated follow-up policy.
A clustered randomized controlled trial including an effect, process, and cost evaluation will be conducted in eighteen hospitals. Nine hospitals in the control group will receive the common implementation strategy (i.e., dissemination of the guideline). In the intervention group, an intensive implementation strategy will be introduced. Clinicians will receive education and tools for risk calculation, interpretation, and communication. Patients will also receive these tools, in addition to patient decision aids. The effect evaluation includes assessment of the number of patients for whom risk calculation, interpretation, and communication is performed correctly, and the number of patients following the indicated follow-up policy. The actual exposure to the implementation strategies and users' experiences will be assessed in the process evaluation. In a cost evaluation, the costs of the implementation strategies will be determined.
The results of this study will help determine the most effective method as well as the costs of improving the recognition of individuals at an increased familial CRC risk. It will provide insight into the experiences of both patients and clinicians with these strategies.The knowledge gathered in this study can be used to improve the recognition of familial and hereditary CRC at both the national and international level, and will serve as an example to improve care for patients and their relatives worldwide. Our results may also be useful in improving healthcare in other diseases.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00929097.
具有多位结直肠癌(CRC)亲属和/或早发 CRC 亲属的个体发生 CRC 的风险增加。他们有资格接受预防措施,例如定期结肠镜检查和/或遗传咨询。目前,大多数高危个体并未遵循既定的随访政策。在新的家族性和遗传性 CRC 指南中,临床医生在计算、解释和交流家族性 CRC 风险方面有了新的任务。这将导致更好地识别具有较高家族性 CRC 风险的个体,使他们能够采取有效的预防措施。这项试验比较了两种实施策略(常规策略与强化策略),重点是临床医生的风险计算、解释和沟通,以及患者对既定随访政策的接受程度。
在 18 家医院进行一项聚类随机对照试验,包括效果、过程和成本评估。对照组中的 9 家医院将接受常规实施策略(即指南的传播)。在干预组中,将引入强化实施策略。临床医生将接受风险计算、解释和沟通方面的教育和工具。患者还将获得这些工具以及患者决策辅助工具。效果评估包括评估正确进行风险计算、解释和沟通的患者数量,以及遵循既定随访政策的患者数量。在过程评估中,将评估实际接触实施策略和用户体验的情况。在成本评估中,将确定实施策略的成本。
这项研究的结果将有助于确定提高识别具有较高家族性 CRC 风险个体的最有效方法和成本。它将提供患者和临床医生对这些策略的经验的见解。本研究中获得的知识可用于改善国家和国际层面的家族性和遗传性 CRC 的识别,并将为改善全球患者及其亲属的护理提供范例。我们的研究结果也可能有助于改善其他疾病的医疗保健。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00929097。