• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能选择(Smart Choices)包装正面营养标签计划:营养标准的原理和制定。

The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition labeling program: rationale and development of the nutrition criteria.

机构信息

ConAgra Foods Inc., Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1078S-1089S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450B. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

DOI:10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450B
PMID:20181813
Abstract

The goal of the Smart Choices Program (SCP) is to provide a simple front-of-the-package icon system to direct consumers to smarter food choices in the supermarket, which will eventually lead to more balanced diets and to more beneficial foods as food manufacturers renovate products to meet the nutrition criteria for carrying the icon. The SCP was developed by a coalition of scientists and nutrition educators, experts with experience with dietary guidelines, public health organizations, and food manufacturers in response to consumer confusion over multiple front-of-the-package systems based on different criteria. Representatives from different government organizations acted as observers. The process of developing the program was facilitated by the nonprofit Keystone Center, an organization that develops consensus solutions to complex health and social policy changes. The nutrition criteria for receiving the SCP icon are specific for product category by indicating "smarter" products within that category. A calorie indicator noting calories per serving and servings per package accompanies the SCP icon to remind consumers that calories do count, even for smarter food choices. For a product to qualify, it first has to be below the threshold for "nutrients to limit" and then (in most cases) it must be above the threshold for one or more nutrients or food groups to encourage. The criteria are based on the 2005 Dietary Guidelines and other consensus science and are transparent and available on the SCP website. This article describes the nutrition criteria and rationales for their selection.

摘要

“明智之选”计划(SCP)的目标是提供一个简单的包装前端图标系统,以便在超市引导消费者做出更明智的食物选择,这最终将导致更均衡的饮食,并使更多有益的食物随着食品制造商为符合带有该图标的营养标准而对产品进行改造。该计划由科学家和营养教育家、有饮食指南经验的专家、公共卫生组织以及食品制造商组成的联盟制定,旨在回应消费者对基于不同标准的多种包装前端系统感到困惑。来自不同政府组织的代表担任观察员。非营利组织基石中心(Keystone Center)促进了该计划的制定过程,该组织致力于为复杂的卫生和社会政策变化制定共识解决方案。获得 SCP 图标的营养标准是特定于产品类别的,通过指出该类别内的“更明智”产品来实现。一个卡路里指标,标注每份食物的卡路里和每份包装的份数,伴随着 SCP 图标,提醒消费者即使是更明智的食物选择,卡路里也很重要。要符合条件,产品首先必须低于“限制营养素”的阈值,然后(在大多数情况下)必须高于一个或多个营养素或食物组的阈值,以鼓励摄入。这些标准基于 2005 年的饮食指南和其他共识科学,并且在 SCP 网站上是透明和可用的。本文描述了营养标准及其选择的理由。

相似文献

1
The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition labeling program: rationale and development of the nutrition criteria.智能选择(Smart Choices)包装正面营养标签计划:营养标准的原理和制定。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1078S-1089S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450B. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
2
Choosing front-of-package food labelling nutritional criteria: how smart were 'Smart Choices'?选择包装正面食品标签营养标准:“聪明选择”有多明智?
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Feb;15(2):262-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011000826. Epub 2011 May 16.
3
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
4
Evaluation of consumer understanding of different front-of-package nutrition labels, 2010-2011.2010-2011 年消费者对不同包装正面营养标签理解情况的评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E149. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120015.
5
Banning front-of-package food labels: first Amendment constraints on public health policy.禁止使用食品标签:第一修正案对公共卫生政策的限制。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jun;14(6):1123-6; discussion 1127. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002843. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
6
Guiding stars: the effect of a nutrition navigation program on consumer purchases at the supermarket.导航星:营养导航计划对超市消费者购买行为的影响。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1090S-1094S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450C. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
7
Development of international criteria for a front of package food labelling system: the International Choices Programme.开发国际包装食品标签系统标准:国际选择计划。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Nov;65(11):1190-200. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.101. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
8
Updated US Department of Agriculture Food Patterns meet goals of the 2010 dietary guidelines.美国农业部更新后的食物模式符合 2010 年饮食指南的目标。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Oct;112(10):1648-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
9
Single-larger-portion-size and dual-column nutrition labeling may help consumers make more healthful food choices.单一较大份量和双栏营养标签可能有助于消费者做出更健康的食物选择。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Feb;113(2):241-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.11.006.
10
Effectiveness of interpretive front-of-pack nutritional labelling schemes on the promotion of healthier food choices: a systematic review.解读型营养标签在促进更健康食品选择方面的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Mar;18(1):24-37. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000214.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Randomly Providing Nutri-Score Information on Actual Purchases in Colombia.随机提供 Nutri-Score 信息对哥伦比亚实际购买行为的影响。
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 26;11(3):491. doi: 10.3390/nu11030491.
2
A Meta-Analysis of Food Labeling Effects on Consumer Diet Behaviors and Industry Practices.食品标签对消费者饮食行为和行业实践影响的元分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Feb;56(2):300-314. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.09.024. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
The development of a single health-endorsement logo for South Africa.为南非制定单一的健康认可标识。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jun;21(8):1444-1454. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000034. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
4
Modifications in the Consumption of Energy, Sugar, and Saturated Fat among the Mexican Adult Population: Simulation of the Effect When Replacing Processed Foods that Comply with a Front of Package Labeling System.墨西哥成年人的能量、糖和饱和脂肪摄入量的变化:用符合包装正面标签系统的加工食品替代来模拟效果。
Nutrients. 2018 Jan 19;10(1):101. doi: 10.3390/nu10010101.
5
Warnings as a directive front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme: comparison with the Guideline Daily Amount and traffic-light systems.作为指令性前置营养标签方案的警告:与每日建议摄入量和红绿灯系统的比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2308-2317. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000866. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
6
Monitoring changes in the nutritional content of ready-to-eat grain-based dessert products manufactured and purchased between 2005 and 2012.监测2005年至2012年期间生产和购买的即食谷物类甜品的营养成分变化。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Mar;115(3):360-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
7
Processed foods: contributions to nutrition.加工食品:对营养的贡献。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jun;99(6):1525-42. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.089284. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
8
Evaluation of consumer understanding of different front-of-package nutrition labels, 2010-2011.2010-2011 年消费者对不同包装正面营养标签理解情况的评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E149. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120015.
9
Facts up front versus traffic light food labels: a randomized controlled trial.前置事实与红绿灯食品标签:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.022.
10
Is "processed" a four-letter word? The role of processed foods in achieving dietary guidelines and nutrient recommendations.“加工”是个禁忌词吗?加工食品在实现膳食指南和营养建议方面的作用。
Adv Nutr. 2012 Jul 1;3(4):536-48. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000901.