• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择包装正面食品标签营养标准:“聪明选择”有多明智?

Choosing front-of-package food labelling nutritional criteria: how smart were 'Smart Choices'?

机构信息

Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, PO Box 208369, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2012 Feb;15(2):262-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011000826. Epub 2011 May 16.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980011000826
PMID:21729490
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 'Smart Choices' programme was an industry-driven, front-of-package (FOP) nutritional labelling system introduced in the USA in August 2009, ostensibly to help consumers select healthier options during food shopping. Its nutritional criteria were developed by members of the food industry in collaboration with nutrition and public health experts and government officials. The aim of the present study was to test the extent to which products labelled as 'Smart Choices' could be classified as healthy choices on the basis of the Nutrient Profile Model (NPM), a non-industry-developed, validated nutritional standard.

DESIGN

A total of 100 packaged products that qualified for a 'Smart Choices' designation were sampled from eight food and beverage categories. All products were evaluated using the NPM method.

RESULTS

In all, 64 % of the products deemed 'Smart Choices' did not meet the NPM standard for a healthy product. Within each 'Smart Choices' category, 0 % of condiments, 8·70 % of fats and oils, 15·63 % of cereals and 31·58 % of snacks and sweets met NPM thresholds. All sampled soups, beverages, desserts and grains deemed 'Smart Choices' were considered healthy according to the NPM standard.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'Smart Choices' programme is an example of industries' attempts at self-regulation. More than 60 % of foods that received the 'Smart Choices' label did not meet standard nutritional criteria for a 'healthy' food choice, suggesting that industries' involvement in designing labelling systems should be scrutinized. The NPM system may be a good option as the basis for establishing FOP labelling criteria, although more comparisons with other systems are needed.

摘要

目的

“明智之选”计划是一个由行业驱动的、位于包装正面(FOP)的营养标签系统,于 2009 年 8 月在美国推出,旨在帮助消费者在购物时选择更健康的食品。其营养标准由食品行业成员与营养和公共卫生专家以及政府官员合作制定。本研究的目的是根据非行业制定的、经过验证的营养标准——营养概况模型(NPM),检验被贴上“明智之选”标签的产品在多大程度上可以被归类为健康选择。

设计

从 8 个食品和饮料类别中抽取了 100 个符合“明智之选”标准的包装产品。所有产品均采用 NPM 方法进行评估。

结果

在所有被认为是“明智之选”的产品中,有 64%不符合 NPM 健康产品标准。在每个“明智之选”类别中,0%的调味品、8.70%的脂肪和油、15.63%的谷物以及 31.58%的零食和甜食符合 NPM 标准。根据 NPM 标准,所有被认为是“明智之选”的汤、饮料、甜点和谷物都被认为是健康食品。

结论

“明智之选”计划是行业自我监管尝试的一个例子。超过 60%的获得“明智之选”标签的食品不符合标准营养标准,这表明应该对行业参与设计标签系统进行审查。尽管需要与其他系统进行更多比较,但 NPM 系统可能是建立 FOP 标签标准的一个不错选择。

相似文献

1
Choosing front-of-package food labelling nutritional criteria: how smart were 'Smart Choices'?选择包装正面食品标签营养标准:“聪明选择”有多明智?
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Feb;15(2):262-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011000826. Epub 2011 May 16.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.用于更健康食品或非酒精饮料购买及消费的营养标签。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.
4
Defining "High-In" Saturated Fat, Sugar, and Sodium to Help Inform Front-of-Pack Labeling Efforts for Packaged Foods and Beverages in the United States.定义“高含量”饱和脂肪、糖和钠,以助力美国包装食品和饮料的包装正面标签标注工作。
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 17;16(24):4345. doi: 10.3390/nu16244345.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
A Scoping Review of Choice Architecture to Promote Healthy Nutrition in Health and Care Settings.在健康与护理环境中促进健康营养的选择架构的范围审查
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70111. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70111.
7
Comparing the influence of front-of-pack nutrition labels on Saudi consumers' understanding and food selection.比较包装正面营养标签对沙特消费者认知及食物选择的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;13:1527531. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527531. eCollection 2025.
8
Specially formulated foods for treating children with moderate acute malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries.专门为治疗低收入和中等收入国家中度急性营养不良儿童而配制的食品。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 21(6):CD009584. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009584.pub2.
9
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
10
The impact of educational interventions on food label comprehension and food choices among adolescents: a scoping review.教育干预对青少年食品标签理解及食物选择的影响:一项范围综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):2682. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23940-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Legal and regulatory instruments for NCD prevention: a scoping review and descriptive analysis of evaluations in OECD countries.用于非传染性疾病预防的法律和监管工具:经合组织国家评估的范围审查和描述性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18053-4.
2
Uncovering the Effect of European Policy-Making Initiatives in Addressing Nutrition-Related Issues: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis on Front-of-Pack Labels.揭示欧洲政策制定举措在解决营养相关问题方面的影响:关于包装正面标签的系统文献回顾和文献计量分析。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 19;14(16):3423. doi: 10.3390/nu14163423.
3
Adoption and Design of Emerging Dietary Policies to Improve Cardiometabolic Health in the US.

本文引用的文献

1
The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition labeling program: rationale and development of the nutrition criteria.智能选择(Smart Choices)包装正面营养标签计划:营养标准的原理和制定。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1078S-1089S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450B. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
2
The food industry and self-regulation: standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures.食品行业与自我监管:促进成功、避免公共卫生失败的标准。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):240-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160960. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
3
A front-of-pack nutrition logo: a quantitative and qualitative process evaluation in the Netherlands.
采用和设计新的饮食政策以改善美国人心血管代谢健康
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 Apr 14;20(5):25. doi: 10.1007/s11883-018-0726-x.
4
Comparison of online marketing techniques on food and beverage companies' websites in six countries.六个国家食品饮料公司网站上网络营销技巧的比较。
Global Health. 2017 Oct 26;13(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0303-z.
5
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
6
Assessment of the construct validity of the Australian Health Star Rating: a nutrient profiling diagnostic accuracy study.评估澳大利亚星级健康评级的结构有效性:营养成分谱诊断准确性研究。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Nov;71(11):1353-1359. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.23. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
A voluntary nutrition labeling program in restaurants: Consumer awareness, use of nutrition information, and food selection.餐厅自愿营养标签计划:消费者认知度、营养信息使用和食物选择。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Aug 27;4:474-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.08.015. eCollection 2016 Dec.
8
The EU pledge for responsible marketing of food and beverages to children: implementation in food companies.欧盟关于向儿童进行食品和饮料负责任营销的承诺:在食品公司中的实施情况。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug;69(8):896-901. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.52. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
9
Obesity and industry self-regulation of food and beverage marketing: a literature review.肥胖与食品饮料营销的行业自我监管:文献综述
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;68(7):753-9. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.60. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
包装正面营养标识:荷兰的一项定量与定性过程评估
J Health Commun. 2009 Oct-Nov;14(7):631-45. doi: 10.1080/10810730903204247.
4
Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates.肥胖导致的年度医疗支出:按支付方和服务划分的估计。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):w822-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w822. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
5
Defining and labelling 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' food.定义和标注“健康”与“不健康”食品。
Public Health Nutr. 2009 Mar;12(3):331-40. doi: 10.1017/S1368980008002541. Epub 2008 May 29.
6
The Choices programme: a simple, front-of-pack stamp making healthy choices easy.“选择”计划:一种简单的包装正面标识,让健康选择变得轻松。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17 Suppl 1:383-6.
7
Validating a nutrient profile model.验证营养成分模型。
Public Health Nutr. 2008 Apr;11(4):371-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000377. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
8
Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling.消费者对包装正面卡路里标签的偏好。
Public Health Nutr. 2008 Feb;11(2):203-13. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000304. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
9
Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals.使用来自营养专业人员调查的数据测试营养成分模型。
Public Health Nutr. 2007 Apr;10(4):337-45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007666671.
10
Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.软饮料消费对营养与健康的影响:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97(4):667-75. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.083782. Epub 2007 Feb 28.