Suppr超能文献

基层医疗医生和肿瘤医生对基层医疗中癌症随访计划的看法:一项在线调查。

Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey.

机构信息

Oxford Brookes University, Jack Straws Lane, Marston, Oxford, OX3 OFL, UK.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Jun;4(2):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s11764-010-0117-y. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Primary care physicians (PCPs) are playing an increasing role in the follow-up of cancer in England. In 2003 a Cancer Care Review (CCR) was introduced to ensure contact between PCPs and cancer patients within 6 months of diagnosis. The NHS also intends to introduce survivorship care plans (SCP). The aims of this study were to: describe current practice and views in primary care with respect to the CCR and information provision from secondary to primary care following final discharge from hospital follow-up; and to seek views on the perceived usefulness, content, and feasibility of a SCP.

METHODS

An on-line questionnaire survey of 100 oncologists and 200 PCPs.

RESULTS

Half of PCPs undertook the CCR opportunistically, and only 64% had an agreed structure. Forty percent felt the CCR was useful for the doctor, and 60% useful for the patient. Most PCPs and oncologists think a SCP would be useful, but only 40% oncologists thought that it would be easy to produce. At discharge from follow-up, more than half of oncologists said they provided information on histology, treatment, requirements for screening and surveillance, and referral guidance. Less than half provide information on potential late effects and symptoms of recurrence. PCPs felt that information on all of these areas was important and that the information they receive is often inadequate.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: The CCR has not been implemented systematically. There is support for the introduction of a SCP and broad agreement on content. However, careful planning is needed to ensure all necessary information is included and to overcome barriers of implementation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Further research should explore what cancer survivors would find useful in a primary care-based CCR and what should be included in a SCP. This should be clearly communicated to the relevant health care professionals to maximise the benefits cancer survivors and their families gain from these policy initiatives.

摘要

简介

在英国,初级保健医生(PCP)在癌症随访中发挥着越来越重要的作用。2003 年,引入了癌症护理审查(CCR),以确保在诊断后 6 个月内 PCP 与癌症患者保持联系。NHS 还打算引入生存护理计划(SCP)。本研究的目的是:描述初级保健中与 CCR 相关的当前实践和观点,以及从医院随访最终出院后向初级保健提供信息的情况;并寻求对 SCP 的实用性、内容和可行性的看法。

方法

对 100 名肿瘤学家和 200 名 PCP 进行在线问卷调查。

结果

一半的 PCP 机会性地进行 CCR,只有 64%有商定的结构。40%的人认为 CCR 对医生有用,60%的人认为 CCR 对患者有用。大多数 PCP 和肿瘤学家认为 SCP 将是有用的,但只有 40%的肿瘤学家认为这将是容易产生的。在随访结束时,超过一半的肿瘤学家表示他们提供了关于组织学、治疗、筛查和监测要求以及转诊指导的信息。只有不到一半的人提供有关潜在的晚期效应和复发症状的信息。PCP 认为所有这些领域的信息都很重要,而且他们收到的信息往往不足。

讨论/结论:CCR 尚未系统实施。引入 SCP 得到支持,并且对内容有广泛的共识。然而,需要仔细规划以确保包含所有必要的信息,并克服实施障碍。

对癌症幸存者的影响

进一步的研究应该探索癌症幸存者在基于初级保健的 CCR 中会发现哪些有用,以及 SCP 中应包含哪些内容。应将其明确传达给相关的医疗保健专业人员,以最大限度地提高癌症幸存者及其家人从这些政策举措中获得的收益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验