Department of Psychology, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15235, USA.
Psychother Res. 2009 Jul;19(4-5):583-90. doi: 10.1080/10503300902798375.
Bracketing is presented as two forms of researcher engagement: with data and with evolving findings. The first form is the well-known identification and temporary setting aside of the researcher's assumptions. The second engagement is the hermeneutic revisiting of data and of one's evolving comprehension of it in light of a revised understanding of any aspect of the topic. Both of these processes are ongoing, and they include the careful development of language with which to represent findings. Extensive everyday examples of bracketing and of interviewing are presented. As a form of disclosure in qualitative research, the background from which this article was written is shared. At that point, Husserl's and Heidegger's historical introductions of bracketing are presented briefly, followed by a discussion of reflexivity and hermeneutics. The article closes with warnings of how residual positivism can work against qualitative rigor and with a suggested qualitative research study on bracketing.
与数据和与不断发展的发现。第一种形式是众所周知的识别和暂时搁置研究者的假设。第二种参与是对数据和对其不断发展的理解的解释学再访问，这是根据对主题的任何方面的修订理解进行的。这两个过程都是持续的，并且包括仔细发展语言来表示发现。本文介绍了广泛的日常例子，包括括号和访谈。作为定性研究中的一种披露形式，本文分享了写作背景。在这一点上，简要介绍了胡塞尔和海德格尔对括号的历史介绍，随后讨论了反思性和解释学。文章最后警告了残余实证主义如何对定性严谨性产生不利影响，并提出了一项关于括号的定性研究建议。
