Baker Kate C, Bloomsmith Mollie, Neu Kimberly, Griffis Caroline, Maloney Margaret, Oettinger Brooke, Schoof Valerie A M, Martinez Marni
Tulane National Primate Research Center, Covington, Louisiana 70433, USA.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2009;12(3):236-52. doi: 10.1080/10888700902956011.
This study evaluated the application of positive reinforcement training (PRT) as an intervention for abnormal behaviors in singly housed laboratory rhesus macaques at 2 large primate facilities. Training involved basic control behaviors and body-part presentation. The study compared baseline behavioral data on 30 adult males and 33 adult females compared with 3 treatment phases presented in counterbalanced order: 6 min per week of PRT, 20 or 40 min per week of PRT, and 6 min per week of unstructured human interaction (HI). Within-subject parametric tests detected no main or interaction effects involving experimental phase. However, among a subset of subjects with levels of abnormal in the top quartile of the range (n = 15), abnormal behavior was reduced from 35% to 25% of samples with PRT but not with HI. These results suggest that short durations of PRT applied as enrichment for this species and in this context may not in itself be sufficient intervention for abnormal behavior because levels remained high. However, it may be appropriate as an adjunct to other interventions and may be best targeted to the most severely affected individuals.
本研究评估了正强化训练(PRT)作为一种干预措施,在两家大型灵长类动物设施中对单独饲养的实验恒河猴异常行为的应用效果。训练内容包括基本控制行为和身体部位展示。该研究将30只成年雄性和33只成年雌性的基线行为数据,与以平衡顺序呈现的3个治疗阶段进行了比较:每周6分钟的PRT、每周20或40分钟的PRT,以及每周6分钟的无结构化人际互动(HI)。受试者内参数检验未发现涉及实验阶段的主要效应或交互效应。然而,在异常水平处于范围前四分位的一部分受试者(n = 15)中,PRT使异常行为从样本的35%减少到25%,而HI则没有效果。这些结果表明,在该物种和这种情况下,作为丰富环境手段应用的短时间PRT本身可能不足以干预异常行为,因为异常行为水平仍然很高。然而,它可能适合作为其他干预措施的辅助手段,并且可能最适合针对受影响最严重的个体。