Suppr超能文献

电动滑板车对生活质量和心血管风险的影响。

Effect of motorized scooters on quality of life and cardiovascular risk.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Eglin Air Force Base Regional Hospital, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2010 Mar 1;105(5):672-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.049.

Abstract

Physical inactivity increases cardiovascular risk. The possible adverse effects of regular motorized scooter use, recently popularized for patients with physical limitations, has not been previously examined. We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 102 consecutive patients who had obtained medical approval for, and subsequently received, a motorized scooter during a 6-year period. The clinical data were collected for the 12 months before and after the intervention. Surveys assessing 11 different facets of health-related quality of life were returned by 28% of patients. The patients receiving a scooter were 68 +/- 19 years old, and 55% were women. The medical indications for scooter use, by decreasing frequency, were disabling arthritis, chronic lung disease, neurologic disorders, and heart failure. Patients returning the surveys estimated scooter use at a median of 4 hours/day, with walking confined to 30 min/day. Despite significant physical and psychological improvements in all quality-of-life categories (p <0.001), the fasting blood glucose increased from 119 +/- 39 to 133 +/- 49 mg/dl (p = 0.009), hemoglobin A1c increased from 6.3 +/- 0.8 to 6.8 +/- 1.2 (p = 0.019), and 18.7% of patients developed diabetes during the follow-up period. No significant changes in blood pressure were noted, although 20% of patients required additional antihypertensive medication. Despite improvements in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol over time, 50% of dyslipidemic patients required either an increase medication dose or additional medications during follow-up. In conclusion, interventions, such as scooters, that improve self-perceived quality of life, can have detrimental long-term effects by increasing cardiovascular risk, particularly insulin resistance. Physicians should carefully weigh such risks before approving their use, as well as ensure healthy levels of activity afterward.

摘要

身体活动不足会增加心血管风险。最近,对于身体受限的患者来说,常规使用电动代步车的潜在不良影响尚未得到研究。我们进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,纳入了 102 名连续患者,这些患者在 6 年内获得了医疗批准并随后获得了电动代步车。收集了干预前和干预后 12 个月的临床数据。只有 28%的患者返回了评估 11 个不同健康相关生活质量方面的调查。使用代步车的患者年龄为 68 +/- 19 岁,其中 55%为女性。使用代步车的医学指征按频率递减依次为:致残性关节炎、慢性肺部疾病、神经障碍和心力衰竭。返回调查的患者估计代步车的使用时间中位数为每天 4 小时,每天步行限制在 30 分钟以内。尽管所有生活质量类别都有显著的身体和心理改善(p <0.001),但空腹血糖从 119 +/- 39 增加到 133 +/- 49 mg/dl(p = 0.009),血红蛋白 A1c 从 6.3 +/- 0.8 增加到 6.8 +/- 1.2(p = 0.019),18.7%的患者在随访期间患上了糖尿病。虽然 20%的患者需要额外的降压药物,但血压没有明显变化。尽管总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇随时间而改善,但 50%的血脂异常患者在随访期间需要增加药物剂量或增加其他药物。总之,改善自我感知生活质量的干预措施(如代步车)可能会通过增加心血管风险(特别是胰岛素抵抗)而产生不利的长期影响。医生在批准使用之前应仔细权衡这些风险,并确保患者在之后保持健康的活动水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验