• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原位大隐静脉旁路移植术——仍是一线治疗方法吗?一项比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者手术结果的前瞻性研究。

In situ saphenous vein bypass grafting - still first line treatment? A prospective study comparing surgical results between diabetic and non-diabetic populations.

作者信息

Fransson T, Thörne J

机构信息

Kalmar County Hospital, Kalmar, Sweden.

出版信息

Vasa. 2010 Feb;39(1):59-65. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000006.

DOI:10.1024/0301-1526/a000006
PMID:20186677
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective study compares results of infrainguinal revascularisation with autologous vein in diabetic and non-diabetic populations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

101 patients (diabetics (A) n = 50 and non-diabetics (B) n = 51) were operated upon with an in situ saphenous vein bypass to the popliteal artery below knee or to crural arteries, due to critical ischemia. Data on operative details, morbidity, mortality, secondary interventions and graft patency, were collected prospectively. All patients were followed up for 5 years.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar except that diabetics more often suffered from gangrene or tissue loss. The distal anastomoses were constructed significantly more distally in diabetics. There were no differences in perioperative bleeding, length of operation, hospital stay or 30 d mortality. The 5 year patency did not differ significantly between groups, A 68 % vs. B 72 %. The limb salvage was equal in both groups, 86 % after 5 years. Mortality during follow up was significantly higher among diabetics, at two years A 31 % vs. B 14 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal revascularisation with in situ technique is a durable procedure that can be performed with very good results in both diabetics and non-diabetics. The survival among diabetics is however significantly lower, although reaching 69 % at two years.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性研究比较了糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者下肢动脉重建术中使用自体静脉的效果。

患者与方法

101例患者(糖尿病患者(A组)n = 50例,非糖尿病患者(B组)n = 51例)因严重缺血接受了原位大隐静脉旁路移植术,移植至膝下腘动脉或小腿动脉。前瞻性收集手术细节、发病率、死亡率、二次干预及移植物通畅性等数据。所有患者随访5年。

结果

两组患者情况相似,只是糖尿病患者更常出现坏疽或组织缺失。糖尿病患者的远端吻合口位置明显更靠下。围手术期出血、手术时长、住院时间或30天死亡率无差异。两组5年通畅率无显著差异,A组为68%,B组为72%。两组的肢体挽救率相同,5年后均为86%。随访期间糖尿病患者的死亡率显著更高,两年时A组为31%,B组为14%。

结论

采用原位技术进行远端血管重建是一种持久的手术方法,在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中均可取得良好效果。然而,糖尿病患者的生存率显著更低,尽管两年时可达69%。

相似文献

1
In situ saphenous vein bypass grafting - still first line treatment? A prospective study comparing surgical results between diabetic and non-diabetic populations.原位大隐静脉旁路移植术——仍是一线治疗方法吗?一项比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者手术结果的前瞻性研究。
Vasa. 2010 Feb;39(1):59-65. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000006.
2
Intraoperative superficial femoral artery balloon angioplasty and popliteal to distal bypass graft: an option for combined open and endovascular treatment of diabetic gangrene.术中股浅动脉球囊血管成形术及腘动脉至远端旁路移植术:糖尿病坏疽开放与血管腔内联合治疗的一种选择
J Vasc Surg. 2001 May;33(5):955-62. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.114210.
3
Surgery of popliteal artery aneurysms: a 12-year experience.腘动脉动脉瘤手术:12年经验
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;37(3):586-93. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.141.
4
In situ saphenous vein bypass surgery in diabetic patients.
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1992 Sep;6(5):533-9. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80629-2.
5
Composite sequential grafts for femorocrural bypass reconstruction: experience with a modified technique.用于股腘动脉搭桥重建的复合序贯移植物:改良技术的经验
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Oct;36(4):772-8.
6
PTFE bypass to below-knee arteries: distal vein collar or not? A prospective randomised multicentre study.PTFE 旁路至膝下动脉:是否需要远端静脉套环?一项前瞻性随机多中心研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;39(6):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
7
Use of the in-situ lesser saphenous vein bypass from popliteal to peroneal artery.使用原位小隐静脉从腘动脉至腓动脉搭桥。
Ann Vasc Surg. 1997 Jul;11(4):378-82. doi: 10.1007/s100169900064.
8
Popliteal-crural bypass through the posterior approach with lesser saphenous vein for limb salvage.经后路采用小隐静脉行腘-小腿旁路移植术以挽救肢体。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Oct;36(4):708-12.
9
The diabetic patient has a higher benefit from infrapopliteal revascularization than the non-diabetic patient: a 10-year retrospective study.糖尿病患者从腘动脉以下血管血运重建中获益高于非糖尿病患者:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013 Jan;10(1):78-83. doi: 10.1177/1479164112442076. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
10
Optimal conduit choice in the absence of single-segment great saphenous vein for below-knee popliteal bypass.在缺乏单段大隐静脉的情况下,用于膝下腘动脉旁路的最佳移植物选择。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):1008-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.042. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes mellitus was not associated with lower amputation-free survival after open revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia - A nationwide propensity score adjusted analysis.糖尿病与慢性肢体威胁性缺血开放血运重建后的无截肢生存率降低无关 - 全国倾向评分调整分析。
Vasc Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):507-514. doi: 10.1177/1358863X211008249. Epub 2021 May 18.
2
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
3
Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia.
全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):3S-125S.e40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 May 28.