• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[罗兹职业医学研究所对美发师进行斑贴试验的结果]

[Results of patch test in hairdressers examined in the institute of occupational medicine in Łódź].

作者信息

Kieć-Swierczyńska Marta, Krecisz Beata, Chomiczewska Dorota

机构信息

Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. J. Nofera, Łódź Ośrodek Alergii Zawodowej i Zdrowia Srodowiskowego, Pracownia Dermatologii.

出版信息

Med Pr. 2009;60(6):459-67.

PMID:20187494
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Occupational contact dermatitis is a significant health problem in hairdressers. The number of occupational skin diseases in this group constantly increases. The most frequent factors contributing to the skin damage include water, shampoos, detergents, conditioners, hair dyes, bleaches, permanent wave solutions, and components of gloves.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A group of 121 hairdressers (106 women and 6 men) was selected from 4523 patients (2996 women and 1527 men) referred to the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, in 1995-2008, with suspected occupational skin disease. All hairdressers underwent dermatological examination and allergy tests (patch tests with allergens of the European Standard Series and Hairdressing Series, Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Sweden; skin prick tests, Allergopharma, Germany).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Females were more prevalent than males and constituted 94.6% of the study group. Of all the study participants, 30% were trainee hairdressers. At least one positive patch test reaction was found in 69.7% of patients whereas in 30.3% patch tests were negative. The most frequent contact allergens were: nickel sulfate (40% of females), p-phenylenediamine (one fourth of the study group), ammonium persulfate (23.2%), cobalt chloride (21.4%), 2,5-diaminotoluene sulfate (9.8%), formaldehyde (9.8%), ammonium thioglycolate (7.1%), and glyceryl monothioglycolate (7.1%). Moreover, we found positive patch test reactions to thimerosal (14.3%), palladium chloride (11.6%), potassium dichromate (5.3%) and fragrance mix (4.5%). Altogether, occupational origin of skin disease was confirmed in 46.4% of hairdressers with allergic contact dermatitis, in 48.2% of those diagnosed with irritant contact dermatitis and in 0.9% of hairdressers suffering from urticaria. 71% of trainee hairdressers were finally diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis, caused first of all by ammonium persulfate, p-phenylenediamine, nickel and thimerosal. In conclusion, it seems to be indispensable to implement health education program during vocational training of hairdressers and to promote specific preventive measures in this occupational group.

摘要

背景

职业性接触性皮炎是美发师面临的一个重大健康问题。该群体中职业性皮肤病的数量持续增加。导致皮肤损伤的最常见因素包括水、洗发水、洗涤剂、护发素、染发剂、漂白剂、烫发液以及手套的成分。

材料与方法

从1995年至2008年转诊至罗兹诺费职业医学研究所的4523例疑似职业性皮肤病患者(2996名女性和1527名男性)中选取了121名美发师(106名女性和6名男性)。所有美发师均接受了皮肤科检查和过敏测试(使用瑞典Chemotechnique Diagnostics公司的欧洲标准系列和美发系列过敏原进行斑贴试验;德国Allergopharma公司的皮肤点刺试验)。

结果与结论

女性比男性更为普遍,占研究组的94.6%。在所有研究参与者中,30%是实习美发师。69.7%的患者至少有一次斑贴试验阳性反应,而30.3%的斑贴试验为阴性。最常见的接触性过敏原为:硫酸镍(40%的女性)、对苯二胺(研究组的四分之一)、过硫酸铵(23.2%)、氯化钴(21.4%)、2,5 - 二氨基甲苯硫酸盐(9.8%)、甲醛(9.8%)、巯基乙酸铵(7.1%)和甘油单硫代乙醇酸(7.1%)。此外,我们还发现对硫柳汞(14.3%)、氯化钯(11.6%)、重铬酸钾(5.3%)和香料混合物(4.5%)的斑贴试验呈阳性反应。总体而言,在46.4%的过敏性接触性皮炎美发师、48.2%的刺激性接触性皮炎美发师以及0.9%的荨麻疹美发师中确诊了职业性皮肤病病因。71%的实习美发师最终被诊断为过敏性接触性皮炎,主要由过硫酸铵、对苯二胺、镍和硫柳汞引起。总之,在美发师的职业培训期间实施健康教育计划并在该职业群体中推广具体的预防措施似乎是必不可少的。

相似文献

1
[Results of patch test in hairdressers examined in the institute of occupational medicine in Łódź].[罗兹职业医学研究所对美发师进行斑贴试验的结果]
Med Pr. 2009;60(6):459-67.
2
[Occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers].[美发师的职业性接触性皮炎]
Med Pr. 2009;60(5):377-82.
3
Occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers/cosmetologists: retrospective analysis of north american contact dermatitis group data, 1994 to 2010.美发师/美容师职业性接触性皮炎:1994 年至 2010 年北美接触性皮炎组数据的回顾性分析。
Dermatitis. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(6):258-68. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e318273a3b8.
4
[Contact allergy to fragrances].[对香料的接触性过敏]
Med Pr. 2006;57(5):431-7.
5
Hairdressers with dermatitis should always be patch tested regardless of atopy status.患有接触性皮炎的美发师无论是否有特应性皮炎,都应始终进行斑贴试验。
Contact Dermatitis. 2010 Mar;62(3):177-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01696.x.
6
Occupational contact dermatitis in hairdressers: an analysis of patch test data from the Danish contact dermatitis group, 2002-2011.美发师职业性接触性皮炎:2002-2011 年丹麦接触性皮炎研究组斑贴试验数据分析。
Contact Dermatitis. 2014 Apr;70(4):233-7. doi: 10.1111/cod.12176. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
7
[Etiology, determinants, diagnostics and prophylaxis of occupational allergic respiratory diseases in hairdressers].[美发师职业性变应性呼吸道疾病的病因、决定因素、诊断与预防]
Med Pr. 2011;62(5):517-26.
8
Hairdressers presenting to an occupational dermatology clinic in Melbourne, Australia.澳大利亚墨尔本的一家职业皮肤科诊所接待的美发师。
Contact Dermatitis. 2013 May;68(5):300-6. doi: 10.1111/cod.12016. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
9
Dermatological screening and results of patch testing among Polish apprentice hairdressers.波兰学徒理发师的皮肤病筛查和斑贴试验结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Feb;64(2):90-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01844.x.
10
Epidemiological survey of contact dermatitis in Italy (1984-1993) by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali).意大利接触性皮炎流行病学调查(1984 - 1993年),由意大利接触性和环境性皮炎研究小组(GIRDCA)开展
Am J Contact Dermat. 1999 Mar;10(1):18-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Thioglycolate Compounds in an Emerging Technique in the World of Cosmetics-Brow Lamination.硫代乙醇酸盐化合物在美容界新兴技术——眉毛分层中的作用。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Jan;24(1):e16654. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16654. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Hair Product Allergy: A Review of Epidemiology and Management.头发产品过敏:流行病学与管理综述
Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58054. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58054. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Occupational skin disorders in a subset of Nigerian hairdressers.尼日利亚部分美发师的职业性皮肤病
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Oct 10;31:100. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.31.100.16499. eCollection 2018.