医疗技术信任工具验证。
Validation of a trust in medical technology instrument.
机构信息
Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
出版信息
Appl Ergon. 2010 Oct;41(6):812-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
Abstract
A patient's trusting attitude towards technology used in their medical care may be a predictor of acceptance or rejection of the technology and, by extension, the physician. The aim of this study was to rigorously determine the validity of an instrument for measuring patients' trust in medical technology. Instrument validity was established based on a framework, which included test and data evidence for validity assessment. The framework for validity assessment evaluates the instrument on content, substantive, structural, generalizability, external and consequential aspects of validity. The results of the current study show that the instrument is reliable and valid for assessing a patient's trust in obstetric medical technology.
摘要
患者对医疗护理中使用的技术的信任态度可能是其对技术接受或拒绝的预测指标，进而也可能是对医生的接受或拒绝的预测指标。本研究的目的是严格确定用于测量患者对医疗技术信任度的工具的有效性。根据一个框架确定工具的有效性，该框架包括有效性评估的测试和数据证据。有效性评估框架从内容、实质、结构、可推广性、外部和结果方面对工具进行评估。当前研究的结果表明，该工具可靠且有效，可用于评估患者对产科医疗技术的信任度。
相似文献
1
Validation of a trust in medical technology instrument.
Appl Ergon. 2010 Oct;41(6):812-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
2
Construction and validation of a preliminary Chinese version of the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale.
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jul 5;20:1142-50. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889992.
3
Validation of the "SmoCess-GP" instrument - a short patient questionnaire for assessing the smoking cessation activities of general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Feb 1;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-9.
4
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale-the Trust in Oncologist Scale-short form (TiOS-SF).
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1276-8. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
6
Characterizing explanatory models of illness in healthcare: development and validation of the CONNECT instrument.
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):232-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.007.
7
Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians.
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5):510-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905000-00010.
8
Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships.
Psychol Rep. 1990 Dec;67(3 Pt 2):1091-100. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091.
9
Psychometric properties of the Confidence and Trust in Delivery Questionnaire (CTDQ): a pilot study.
BMC Womens Health. 2012 Sep 1;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-26.
10
The Mediating Role of Patients' Trust Between Web-Based Health Information Seeking and Patients' Uncertainty in China: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e25275. doi: 10.2196/25275.
引用本文的文献
1
Perceived Trust and Professional Identity Threat in AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scenario-Based Experimental Study on AI Process Design Features.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 26;9:e64266. doi: 10.2196/64266.
2
Shifting boundaries, extended minds: ambient technology and extended allostatic control.
Synthese. 2025;205(2):81. doi: 10.1007/s11229-025-04924-9. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Trust in Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Instruments Designed to Measure Trust in Medical Care Studies.
J Caring Sci. 2024 Jan 13;13(2):116-137. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33152. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Measuring trust: a text analysis approach to compare, contrast, and select trust questionnaires.
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 15;14:1192020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192020. eCollection 2023.
5
Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 11;19(10):e346. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7638.
6
How different types of users develop trust in technology: a qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology.
Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 29.
7
Trust in technology-mediated collaborative health encounters: constructing trust in passive user interactions with technologies.
Ergonomics. 2012;55(7):752-61. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.663002. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
8
Understanding active and passive users: the effects of an active user using normal, hard and unreliable technologies on user assessment of trust in technology and co-user.
Appl Ergon. 2012 Jul;43(4):702-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
本文引用的文献
1
Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics.
Appl Ergon. 2008 May;39(3):271-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
2
Racial differences in attitudes toward innovative medical technology.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):559-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00453.x.
3
Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics.
Appl Ergon. 2006 Jul;37(4):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
4
Trust in one's physician: the role of ethnic match, autonomy, acculturation, and religiosity among Japanese and Japanese Americans.
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):339-47. doi: 10.1370/afm.289.
5
Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician.
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):957-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00395.x.
6
Are patients' ratings of their physicians related to health outcomes?
Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3(3):229-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.267.
7
How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(9):1937-48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.058. Epub 2004 Nov 13.
8
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
9
Development and testing of the health care system distrust scale.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21146.x.
10
Patient trust in the physician: relationship to patient requests.
Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;19(5):476-83. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.5.476.
Zotero 插件