• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of a trust in medical technology instrument.医疗技术信任工具验证。
Appl Ergon. 2010 Oct;41(6):812-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
2
Construction and validation of a preliminary Chinese version of the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale.维克森林医师信任量表中文版初稿的构建与验证
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jul 5;20:1142-50. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889992.
3
Validation of the "SmoCess-GP" instrument - a short patient questionnaire for assessing the smoking cessation activities of general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.验证“Smocess-GP”工具——一种评估全科医生戒烟活动的简短患者问卷:一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Feb 1;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-9.
4
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale-the Trust in Oncologist Scale-short form (TiOS-SF).肿瘤学家信任量表简版——肿瘤学家信任量表简式(TiOS-SF)的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).评估癌症患者对肿瘤医生的信任:信任肿瘤医生量表(TiOS)的编制与验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1276-8. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
6
Characterizing explanatory models of illness in healthcare: development and validation of the CONNECT instrument.刻画医疗保健中疾病的解释模型:CONNECT工具的开发与验证
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):232-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.007.
7
Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians.医生信任量表的进一步验证与信度测试。斯坦福信任研究医生团队。
Med Care. 1999 May;37(5):510-7. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905000-00010.
8
Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships.医生信任量表的编制:一种评估医患关系中人际信任的方法。
Psychol Rep. 1990 Dec;67(3 Pt 2):1091-100. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091.
9
Psychometric properties of the Confidence and Trust in Delivery Questionnaire (CTDQ): a pilot study.信心和信任分娩问卷(CTDQ)的心理测量学特性:一项试点研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2012 Sep 1;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-26.
10
The Mediating Role of Patients' Trust Between Web-Based Health Information Seeking and Patients' Uncertainty in China: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey.基于网络的健康信息搜索与中国患者不确定性之间的中介作用:基于横断面网络调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 11;24(3):e25275. doi: 10.2196/25275.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived Trust and Professional Identity Threat in AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scenario-Based Experimental Study on AI Process Design Features.基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统中的感知信任与职业身份威胁:关于人工智能流程设计特征的情景式实验研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 26;9:e64266. doi: 10.2196/64266.
2
Shifting boundaries, extended minds: ambient technology and extended allostatic control.边界的转移,扩展的思维:环境技术与扩展的稳态控制。
Synthese. 2025;205(2):81. doi: 10.1007/s11229-025-04924-9. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Trust in Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Instruments Designed to Measure Trust in Medical Care Studies.对医学的信任:旨在衡量对医疗保健研究信任度的工具的范围综述
J Caring Sci. 2024 Jan 13;13(2):116-137. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33152. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Measuring trust: a text analysis approach to compare, contrast, and select trust questionnaires.测量信任:一种用于比较、对比和选择信任调查问卷的文本分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 15;14:1192020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192020. eCollection 2023.
5
Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis.面向患者的电子健康评估指标的心理测量特性:系统评价与分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 11;19(10):e346. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7638.
6
How different types of users develop trust in technology: a qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology.不同类型的用户如何建立对技术的信任:对共享技术中主动和被动用户信任的前因进行定性分析。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 29.
7
Trust in technology-mediated collaborative health encounters: constructing trust in passive user interactions with technologies.对技术介导的协作式健康交互的信任:在被动用户与技术的交互中构建信任。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(7):752-61. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.663002. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
8
Understanding active and passive users: the effects of an active user using normal, hard and unreliable technologies on user assessment of trust in technology and co-user.理解主动用户和被动用户:主动用户使用正常、困难和不可靠技术对用户对技术和共同用户信任评估的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Jul;43(4):702-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical device development: the challenge for ergonomics.医疗设备开发:人体工程学面临的挑战。
Appl Ergon. 2008 May;39(3):271-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.002. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
2
Racial differences in attitudes toward innovative medical technology.对创新医疗技术态度上的种族差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):559-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00453.x.
3
Patient safety, systems design and ergonomics.患者安全、系统设计与人体工程学。
Appl Ergon. 2006 Jul;37(4):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
4
Trust in one's physician: the role of ethnic match, autonomy, acculturation, and religiosity among Japanese and Japanese Americans.对医生的信任:种族匹配、自主性、文化适应和宗教信仰在日本人和日裔美国人中的作用。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):339-47. doi: 10.1370/afm.289.
5
Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician.患者在选择初级保健医生时对技术质量与人际质量的偏好。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):957-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00395.x.
6
Are patients' ratings of their physicians related to health outcomes?患者对医生的评分与健康结果有关吗?
Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3(3):229-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.267.
7
How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales.创新医疗技术的可接受程度如何?对英格兰和威尔士公众观念及态度的调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(9):1937-48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.058. Epub 2004 Nov 13.
8
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.对自动化的信任:设计适度的依赖。
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
9
Development and testing of the health care system distrust scale.医疗保健系统不信任量表的开发与测试。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):57-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21146.x.
10
Patient trust in the physician: relationship to patient requests.患者对医生的信任:与患者诉求的关系
Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;19(5):476-83. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.5.476.

医疗技术信任工具验证。

Validation of a trust in medical technology instrument.

机构信息

Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2010 Oct;41(6):812-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2010.01.009
PMID:20189163
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2893257/
Abstract

A patient's trusting attitude towards technology used in their medical care may be a predictor of acceptance or rejection of the technology and, by extension, the physician. The aim of this study was to rigorously determine the validity of an instrument for measuring patients' trust in medical technology. Instrument validity was established based on a framework, which included test and data evidence for validity assessment. The framework for validity assessment evaluates the instrument on content, substantive, structural, generalizability, external and consequential aspects of validity. The results of the current study show that the instrument is reliable and valid for assessing a patient's trust in obstetric medical technology.

摘要

患者对医疗护理中使用的技术的信任态度可能是其对技术接受或拒绝的预测指标,进而也可能是对医生的接受或拒绝的预测指标。本研究的目的是严格确定用于测量患者对医疗技术信任度的工具的有效性。根据一个框架确定工具的有效性,该框架包括有效性评估的测试和数据证据。有效性评估框架从内容、实质、结构、可推广性、外部和结果方面对工具进行评估。当前研究的结果表明,该工具可靠且有效,可用于评估患者对产科医疗技术的信任度。