• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估癌症患者对肿瘤医生的信任:信任肿瘤医生量表(TiOS)的编制与验证。

Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology-Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1276-8. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-011-1276-8
PMID:21947560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3390706/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS), which aims to measure cancer patients' trust in their oncologist. Structure, reliability and validity were examined.

METHODS

Construction of the TiOS was based on a multidimensional theoretical framework. Cancer patients were surveyed within a week after their consultation. Trust, satisfaction, trust in health care, self-reported health and background variables were assessed. Dimensionality, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity were investigated.

RESULTS

Data of 423 patients were included (response rate = 65%). After item reduction, the TiOS included 18 items. Trust scores were high. Exploratory factor analysis suggested one-dimensionality. Confirmatory factor analysis nevertheless indicated a reasonable fit of our four-dimensional theoretical model, distinguishing competence, fidelity, honesty and caring. Internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities were high. Good construct validity was indicated by moderate correlations of trust (TiOS) with satisfaction, trust in health care, willingness to recommend and number of consultations with the oncologist. Exploratory analyses suggested significant correlations of trust with ethnicity and age.

CONCLUSIONS

The TiOS reliably and validly assesses cancer patients' trust in their oncologist. The questionnaire can be employed in both clinical practice and future research of cancer patients' trust.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发和验证信任肿瘤学家量表(TiOS),旨在衡量癌症患者对肿瘤学家的信任。对其结构、信度和效度进行了检验。

方法

TiOS 的构建基于多维理论框架。在咨询后一周内对癌症患者进行了调查。评估了信任、满意度、对医疗保健的信任、自我报告的健康状况和背景变量。研究了维度、内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。

结果

共纳入 423 例患者(应答率=65%)。经过项目删减,TiOS 包括 18 个项目。信任得分较高。探索性因子分析表明具有一维性。然而,验证性因子分析表明,我们的四维度理论模型具有合理的拟合度,能够区分能力、忠诚、诚实和关怀。内部一致性和重测信度较高。信任(TiOS)与满意度、对医疗保健的信任、推荐意愿和与肿瘤学家的咨询次数之间存在中度相关性,表明具有良好的结构效度。探索性分析表明,信任与种族和年龄存在显著相关性。

结论

TiOS 可靠且有效地评估了癌症患者对肿瘤学家的信任。该问卷可用于癌症患者信任的临床实践和未来研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a65/3390706/35b01f7e5eda/520_2011_1276_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a65/3390706/35b01f7e5eda/520_2011_1276_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a65/3390706/35b01f7e5eda/520_2011_1276_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: development and validation of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).评估癌症患者对肿瘤医生的信任:信任肿瘤医生量表(TiOS)的编制与验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1276-8. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
2
Validation of the Italian version of the full and abbreviated Trust in Oncologist Scale.验证完整和简化的信任肿瘤学家量表的意大利语版本。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13334. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13334. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale-the Trust in Oncologist Scale-short form (TiOS-SF).肿瘤学家信任量表简版——肿瘤学家信任量表简式(TiOS-SF)的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
4
Validation of the English version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS).信度在肿瘤学家量表(TiOS)的英文版本的验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Apr;91(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
5
Validation of the Japanese version of the full and short form Trust in Oncologist Scale.日本版肿瘤学家信任量表完整版和简版的验证
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Jul 25:1-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000937.
6
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients' Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?共享决策与乳腺癌患者对肿瘤医生信任之间是否存在关系?
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19889905. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Patients' trust in their physician--psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the "Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale".患者对医生的信任——“维克森林医生信任量表”荷兰语版的心理测量学特性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jul;76(1):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.020. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
8
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-J) for evaluating oncologist consultations.用于评估肿瘤学家会诊的日本版患者满意度调查问卷(PSQ-J)的有效性和可靠性。
PEC Innov. 2023 May 18;2:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100166. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
How attachment style and locus of control influence patients' trust in their oncologist.依恋风格和控制源如何影响患者对肿瘤医生的信任。
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Mar;76(3):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
10
How can communication by oncologists enhance patients' trust? An experimental study.肿瘤学家的沟通如何增强患者的信任?一项实验研究。
Ann Oncol. 2014 Apr;25(4):896-901. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu027. Epub 2014 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Discrimination and Poor Provider Communication on Public Trust in Cancer Advice From Physicians.歧视和医护人员沟通不善对公众对医生癌症建议的信任的影响。
J Patient Exp. 2025 Aug 6;12:23743735251362537. doi: 10.1177/23743735251362537. eCollection 2025.
2
Medical Mistrust in Online Cancer Communities: A Large-Scale Analysis Across 10 Cancer Entities.在线癌症社区中的医疗不信任:对10种癌症实体的大规模分析。
Psychooncology. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70180. doi: 10.1002/pon.70180.
3
Comforting styles of serious illness conversations: a Swiss wide factorial survey study.

本文引用的文献

1
Disentangling cancer patients' trust in their oncologist: a qualitative study.解析癌症患者对肿瘤医生信任的影响因素:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2012 Apr;21(4):392-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1910. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
2
Cancer patients' trust in their physician-a review.癌症患者对医生的信任——综述
Psychooncology. 2011 Mar;20(3):227-41. doi: 10.1002/pon.1745.
3
"When patients and families feel abandoned".当患者和家属感到被抛弃时。
重症疾病谈话中的安慰方式:一项瑞士范围内的析因调查研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 14;23(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04046-6.
4
Communication and relationships: how patients perceive informational and interactional organizational justice can improve patient-centered care, a study with samples from Spain and the U.S.沟通与关系:患者如何看待信息性和互动性组织公正能够改善以患者为中心的护理,一项来自西班牙和美国样本的研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12461-x.
5
Development and alpha-testing of a patient decision aid for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia regarding dose reduction.针对慢性髓性白血病患者剂量减少问题的患者决策辅助工具的开发与阿尔法测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02806-7.
6
Trust in Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Instruments Designed to Measure Trust in Medical Care Studies.对医学的信任:旨在衡量对医疗保健研究信任度的工具的范围综述
J Caring Sci. 2024 Jan 13;13(2):116-137. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33152. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Measuring trust in one's physician: A scoping review.测量对医生的信任:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0303840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303840. eCollection 2024.
8
Disentangling trust of patients with rare cancer in their healthcare professionals and the healthcare system: a qualitative interview study.剖析罕见癌症患者对其医疗保健专业人员及医疗保健系统的信任:一项定性访谈研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun;19(3):1059-1068. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01531-w. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
9
Telehealth follow-up consultations for melanoma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Patient and clinician satisfaction.新冠疫情期间黑色素瘤患者的远程医疗随访咨询:患者和临床医生的满意度。
Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(23):21373-21388. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6679. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
10
Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women's preferences in the LORD-trial.主动监测与低危 DCIS 治疗:LORD 试验中的女性偏好。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Oct;192:113276. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Nov;19(11):1713-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1007-6. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
4
Racial differences in trust and regular source of patient care and the implications for prostate cancer screening use.患者护理的信任度、常规来源方面的种族差异以及对前列腺癌筛查使用的影响。
Cancer. 2009 Nov 1;115(21):5048-59. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24539.
5
Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review.内隐测量:一项规范性分析与综述。
Psychol Bull. 2009 May;135(3):347-368. doi: 10.1037/a0014211.
6
Dependence and caring in clinical communication: the relevance of attachment and other theories.临床沟通中的依赖与关怀:依恋理论及其他理论的相关性
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
7
Determinants of trust in the patient-oncologist relationship.患者与肿瘤学家关系中信任的决定因素。
Palliat Support Care. 2007 Dec;5(4):405-9. doi: 10.1017/s1478951507000600.
8
Interventions for improving patients' trust in doctors and groups of doctors.提高患者对医生及医生群体信任度的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD004134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004134.pub2.
9
Trust in physicians and elements of the medical interaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.类风湿关节炎和系统性红斑狼疮患者对医生的信任及医疗互动要素
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jun 15;55(3):385-93. doi: 10.1002/art.21988.
10
Racial differences in trust and lung cancer patients' perceptions of physician communication.信任方面的种族差异以及肺癌患者对医生沟通的认知。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):904-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1955.