Senan S, Lagerwaard F
Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University medical center, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cancer Radiother. 2010 Apr;14(2):115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2009.11.003. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
In early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), recent data from both prospective clinical trials and single institutions indicate that local control rates in excess of 88% can be achieved using stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Treatment-related toxicity is uncommon when "risk-adapted" fractionation schemes are applied, with lower dose per fraction used for larger tumors and when the planning target volume is in the proximity of critical structures. Both the superior outcome and convenience of fewer visits have led to a preference for SRT over conventional radiotherapy in countries such as Japan and the Netherlands. Reports on outcomes of SRT in patients unfit to undergo surgery may underestimate late toxicity as such patients have significant non-cancer related mortality. The evolution of technology has allowed for further improvements in the accuracy and speed of SRT delivery. Recent advances such as on-board imaging and intensity-modulated arc delivery techniques have improved treatment accuracy and tolerability, as well as the confidence of clinicians in applying SRT outside the setting of specialized tertiary institutions. Studies comparing primary surgery with SRT are underway, but the available data are compelling enough to allow SRT to be considered an established treatment option in patients who are aged 75 years and older, and in whom the estimated risks of postoperative mortality rates are high. The clinical development of SRT will be greatly facilitated by improvements in diagnostic procedures for peripheral pulmonary nodules. However, treatment without pathological confirmation may be justified in medically inoperable patients if the risk of malignancy is sufficiently high as to warrant an invasive diagnostic procedure.
在早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,来自前瞻性临床试验和单一机构的最新数据表明,使用立体定向放射治疗(SRT)可实现超过88%的局部控制率。当应用“风险适应”分割方案时,与治疗相关的毒性并不常见,对于较大肿瘤采用较低的分次剂量,且计划靶体积靠近关键结构时也是如此。SRT优越的治疗效果和就诊次数较少的便利性,使得在日本和荷兰等国家,相较于传统放疗,人们更倾向于选择SRT。关于不适合手术的患者接受SRT治疗结果的报告可能低估了晚期毒性,因为这类患者存在显著的非癌症相关死亡率。技术的发展使SRT的准确性和治疗速度得以进一步提高。诸如机载成像和调强弧形放疗技术等最新进展,提高了治疗的准确性和耐受性,以及临床医生在专业三级医疗机构之外应用SRT的信心。比较初次手术与SRT的研究正在进行,但现有数据足以令人信服,使SRT被视为75岁及以上、术后死亡率估计风险较高患者的既定治疗选择。外周肺结节诊断程序的改进将极大地促进SRT的临床发展。然而,如果恶性肿瘤风险足够高,以至于需要进行侵入性诊断程序,那么对于医学上无法手术的患者,未经病理证实的治疗可能是合理的。