• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人运动技能发展减退:运动组块使用受限的迹象。

Diminished motor skill development in elderly: indications for limited motor chunk use.

作者信息

Verwey Willem B

机构信息

Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jun;134(2):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.001
PMID:20189547
Abstract

The present study examined whether elderly use motor chunks after practicing discrete keying sequences, just like young adults, or whether they perhaps learn these movement patterns in a different way. To that end, elderly (75-88) and young adults (18-28) practiced as part of the discrete sequence production (DSP) task two fixed series of three and six key presses. The results demonstrate that elderly did improve with practice but this improvement was largely sequence-unspecific. Detailed analyses showed that, in contrast to young adults, most elderly did not use motor chunks, had little explicit sequence knowledge, and remained highly dependent on external stimuli. Still, elderly did show sequence-specific learning with a 6-key sequence that can be explained by an associative learning mechanism.

摘要

本研究探讨了老年人在练习离散按键序列后是否会像年轻人一样使用运动组块,或者他们是否可能以不同的方式学习这些运动模式。为此,老年人(75 - 88岁)和年轻人(18 - 28岁)作为离散序列生成(DSP)任务的一部分,练习了两个固定的由三次和六次按键组成的序列。结果表明,老年人确实通过练习得到了改善,但这种改善在很大程度上与序列无关。详细分析表明,与年轻人不同,大多数老年人不使用运动组块,几乎没有明确的序列知识,并且仍然高度依赖外部刺激。尽管如此,老年人在六键序列上确实表现出了序列特异性学习,这可以通过联想学习机制来解释。

相似文献

1
Diminished motor skill development in elderly: indications for limited motor chunk use.老年人运动技能发展减退:运动组块使用受限的迹象。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jun;134(2):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
2
Evidence for lasting sequence segmentation in the discrete sequence-production task.离散序列生成任务中持久序列分割的证据。
J Mot Behav. 2003 Jun;35(2):171-81. doi: 10.1080/00222890309602131.
3
Motor skill learning in the middle-aged: limited development of motor chunks and explicit sequence knowledge.中年人运动技能学习:运动组块发展有限,明确序列知识。
Psychol Res. 2011 Sep;75(5):406-22. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0320-0. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
4
The dynamics of implicit skill consolidation in young and elderly adults.年轻成年人和老年成年人内隐技能巩固的动态。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jan;66(1):15-22. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq063. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
5
Processing modes and parallel processors in producing familiar keying sequences.在生成常见键控序列时的处理模式和并行处理器。
Psychol Res. 2003 May;67(2):106-22. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0120-7. Epub 2002 Nov 30.
6
Effect of sequence length on the execution of familiar keying sequences: lasting segmentation and preparation?序列长度对熟悉键控序列执行的影响:持续分割与准备?
J Mot Behav. 2003 Dec;35(4):343-54. doi: 10.1080/00222890309603155.
7
Learning a keying sequence you never executed: evidence for independent associative and motor chunk learning.学习一个你从未执行过的按键序列:独立联想和运动组块学习的证据
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
8
Motor learning and chunking in dyslexia.阅读障碍中的运动学习与组块化
J Mot Behav. 2009 Jul;41(4):331-7. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.41.4.331-338.
9
Distinct modes of executing movement sequences: reacting, associating, and chunking.执行运动序列的不同模式:反应、关联和组块。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jul;140(3):274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
10
Contributions from associative and explicit sequence knowledge to the execution of discrete keying sequences.联想序列知识和显性序列知识对离散按键序列执行的贡献。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:122-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct brain network organizations between club players and novices under different difficulty levels.不同难度水平下,职业球员与新手的大脑网络组织存在明显差异。
Brain Behav. 2024 Apr;14(4):e3488. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3488.
2
C-SMB 2.0: Integrating over 25 years of motor sequencing research with the Discrete Sequence Production task.C-SMB 2.0:整合 25 年以上的运动序列研究与离散序列产生任务。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):931-978. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02377-0. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
Dissecting motor skill acquisition: Spatial coordinates take precedence.
剖析运动技能习得:空间坐标占主导地位。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jul 22;8(29):eabo3505. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo3505. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
A study on how concurrent visual feedback affects motor learning of adjustability of grasping force in younger and older adults.一项关于同时视觉反馈如何影响年轻人和老年人抓握力可调节性的运动学习的研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 24;12(1):10755. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14975-4.
5
Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Prefrontal Cortex Slows Sequence Learning in Older Adults.经颅直流电阳极刺激前额叶皮层会减缓老年人的序列学习。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Feb 24;16:814204. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.814204. eCollection 2022.
6
Evidence for associations between Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test and motor skill learning in older adults.老年人 Rey-Osterrieth 复杂图形测试与运动技能学习之间关联的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Mar;214:103261. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103261. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Regular participation in leisure time activities and high cardiovascular fitness improve motor sequence learning in older adults.经常参与休闲活动和拥有较高的心血管健康水平可改善老年人的运动序列学习能力。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1488-1502. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01351-y. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
Skill acquisition as a function of age, hand and task difficulty: Interactions between cognition and action.技能获取与年龄、手和任务难度的关系:认知与动作的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211706. eCollection 2019.
9
Skill in discrete keying sequences is execution rate specific.在离散键控序列方面的技能具有执行速率特异性。
Psychol Res. 2019 Mar;83(2):235-246. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0967-2. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
10
Differences in chunking behavior between young and older adults diminish with extended practice.年轻人和年长者在组块行为上的差异会随着练习时间的延长而减小。
Psychol Res. 2019 Mar;83(2):275-285. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0963-6. Epub 2017 Dec 21.