• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善个人健康记录,以实现以患者为中心的护理。

Improving personal health records for patient-centered care.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Informatics, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02446, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):192-5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000927.

DOI:10.1136/jamia.2009.000927
PMID:20190063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3000780/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the patient-centeredness of personal health records (PHR) and offer recommendations for best practice guidelines.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews were conducted in seven large early PHR adopter organizations in 2007. Organizations were purposively selected to represent a variety of US settings, including medium and large hospitals, ambulatory care facilities, insurers and health plans, government departments, and commercial sectors.

MEASUREMENTS

Patient-centeredness was assessed against a framework of care that includes: (1) respect for patient values, preferences, and expressed needs; (2) information and education; (3) access to care; (4) emotional support to relieve fear and anxiety; (5) involvement of family and friends; (6) continuity and secure transition between healthcare providers; (7) physical comfort; (8) coordination of care. Within this framework we used evidence for patient preferences (where it exists) to compare existing PHR policies, and propose a best practice model.

RESULTS

Most organizations enable many patient-centered functions such as data access for proxies and minors. No organization allows patient views of clinical progress notes, and turnaround times for PHR reporting of normal laboratory results can be up to 7 days.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest patient-centeredness for personal health records can be improved, and recommendations are made for best practice guidelines.

摘要

目的

评估个人健康记录(PHR)的以患者为中心程度,并为最佳实践指南提供建议。

设计

2007 年,在七个大型早期 PHR 采用者组织中进行了半结构化访谈。这些组织是根据包括美国各种环境的医疗机构,如中型和大型医院、门诊护理设施、保险公司和医疗计划、政府部门和商业部门在内的特定目的选择的。

测量

根据包括以下内容的护理框架评估以患者为中心的程度:(1)尊重患者的价值观、偏好和表达的需求;(2)信息和教育;(3)获得护理的机会;(4)情感支持以减轻恐惧和焦虑;(5)家庭成员和朋友的参与;(6)医疗保健提供者之间的连续性和安全过渡;(7)身体舒适;(8)护理协调。在这个框架内,我们使用了患者偏好的证据(如果存在的话)来比较现有的 PHR 政策,并提出了最佳实践模型。

结果

大多数组织都允许许多以患者为中心的功能,例如代理人和未成年人的数据访问。没有组织允许患者查看临床进度记录,PHR 报告正常实验室结果的周转时间最长可达 7 天。

结论

研究结果表明,个人健康记录的以患者为中心程度可以得到改善,并为最佳实践指南提出了建议。

相似文献

1
Improving personal health records for patient-centered care.改善个人健康记录,以实现以患者为中心的护理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):192-5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000927.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Governance for personal health records.个人健康记录的管理
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):14-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2854. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
4
The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings.个人健康记录悖论:医疗保健专业人员的观点以及组织和临床环境中个人健康记录系统的信息生态
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 4;15(4):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2443.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
User-centered design and enhancement of an electronic personal health record to support survivors of pediatric cancers.以用户为中心设计并改进电子个人健康记录,以支持小儿癌症幸存者。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3905-3914. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05199-w. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
7
Personal health records in the Netherlands: potential user preferences quantified by a discrete choice experiment.荷兰的个人健康记录:通过离散选择实验量化潜在用户偏好。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 May 1;24(3):529-536. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw158.
8
Early evaluation of experiences of health care providers in reception centers with a patient-held personal health record for asylum seekers: a multi-sited qualitative study in a German federal state.早期评估接待中心的医疗服务提供者在使用寻求庇护者持有的个人健康记录方面的经验:德国联邦州的一项多地点定性研究。
Global Health. 2018 Jul 20;14(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0394-1.
9
If we offer it, will they accept? Factors affecting patient use intentions of personal health records and secure messaging.如果我们提供它,他们会接受吗?影响患者对个人健康记录和安全消息传递使用意愿的因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 26;15(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2243.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the existing usage gap of electronic health records in the United States: A study of National Health Survey.审视美国电子健康记录的现有使用差距:一项关于国民健康调查的研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Dec 10;25:101577. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101577. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
An Iterative and Collaborative End-to-End Methodology Applied to Digital Mental Health.一种应用于数字心理健康的迭代协作式端到端方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 23;12:574440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.574440. eCollection 2021.
3
A Technology Acceptance Model for Deploying Masks to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan (My Health Bank): Web-Based Cross-sectional Survey Study.用于在台湾(我的健康银行)部署口罩以对抗 COVID-19 大流行的技术接受模型:基于网络的横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 21;23(4):e27069. doi: 10.2196/27069.
4
Patients' Perceptions of Portal Use Across Care Settings: Qualitative Study.患者对跨医疗环境使用门户网站的认知:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 6;21(6):e13126. doi: 10.2196/13126.
5
Investigating data accessibility of personal health apps.调查个人健康应用程序的数据可访问性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 May 1;26(5):412-419. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz003.
6
Simulated Clinical Encounters Using Patient-Operated mHealth: Experimental Study to Investigate Patient-Provider Communication.使用患者操作的移动健康技术进行模拟临床会诊:调查医患沟通的实验研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 1;6(11):e11131. doi: 10.2196/11131.
7
Variability in adolescent portal privacy features: how the unique privacy needs of the adolescent patient create a complex decision-making process.青少年门户隐私功能的变异性:青少年患者独特的隐私需求如何导致复杂的决策过程。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):1008-1017. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy042.
8
Focus Section Health IT Usability: Applying a Task-Technology Fit Model to Adapt an Electronic Patient Portal for Patient Work.焦点专题 健康信息技术的可用性:应用任务-技术匹配模型来调整电子患者门户以适应患者工作。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan;9(1):174-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1632396. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Supporting Client and Family Engagement in Care Through the Planning and Implementation of an Online Consumer Health Portal.通过规划和实施在线消费者健康门户来支持客户和家庭参与护理。
J Patient Exp. 2016 Jun;3(2):48-51. doi: 10.1177/2374373516652256. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
10
The Rules of Engagement: Perspectives on Secure Messaging From Experienced Ambulatory Patient Portal Users.参与规则:来自经验丰富的门诊患者门户网站用户对安全消息传递的看法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Jul 4;5(3):e13. doi: 10.2196/medinform.7516.

本文引用的文献

1
What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record.必备要素:理想个人健康记录的特征。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):369-76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.369.
2
Governance for personal health records.个人健康记录的管理
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):14-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2854. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
3
Whose personal control? Creating private, personally controlled health records for pediatric and adolescent patients.谁的个人控制权?为儿科和青少年患者创建私人的、由个人控制的健康记录。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):737-43. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2865. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
4
Tectonic shifts in the health information economy.健康信息经济中的结构性转变。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 17;358(16):1732-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb0800220.
5
Early experiences with personal health records.个人健康记录的早期经历。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):1-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2562. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
6
Potential of electronic personal health records.电子个人健康记录的潜力。
BMJ. 2007 Aug 18;335(7615):330-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39279.482963.AD.
7
Information technology comes to medicine.信息技术进入医学领域。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2527-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr066212.
8
Direct reporting of laboratory test results to patients by mail to enhance patient safety.通过邮件直接向患者报告实验室检测结果以提高患者安全性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Oct;21(10):1075-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00553.x. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
9
Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: a report from the ASIPS Collaborative.患者对正常实验室检查结果通知方式的偏好:来自ASIPS协作组的报告
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Mar 8;6(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-11.
10
A 67-year-old man who e-mails his physician.一位67岁的男子给他的医生发电子邮件。
JAMA. 2004 Nov 10;292(18):2255-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.18.2255.