• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用患者操作的移动健康技术进行模拟临床会诊:调查医患沟通的实验研究

Simulated Clinical Encounters Using Patient-Operated mHealth: Experimental Study to Investigate Patient-Provider Communication.

作者信息

Tunnell Harry, Faiola Anthony, Bolchini Davide, Bartlett Ellis Rebecca

机构信息

School of Informatics and Computing, Department of Human-Centered Computing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 1;6(11):e11131. doi: 10.2196/11131.

DOI:10.2196/11131
PMID:30389652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6238098/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study investigates patient-centered mobile health (mHealth) technology in terms of the secondary user experience (UX). Specifically, it examines how personal mobile technology, under patient control, can be used to improve patient-provider communication about the patient's health care during their first visit to a provider. Common ground, a theory about language use, is used as the theoretical basis to examine interactions. A novel concept of this study is that it is one of the first empirical studies to explore the relative meaningfulness of a secondary UX for specific health care tasks.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the extent that patient-operated mHealth technology can be designed to improve the communication between the patient and provider during an initial face-to-face encounter.

METHODS

The experimental study was conducted in 2 large Midwestern cities from February 2016 to May 2016. A custom-designed smartphone app prototype was used as the study treatment. The experimental design was posttest-only control group and included video-recorded simulated face-to-face clinical encounters in which an actor role-played a patient. Experienced clinicians consisting of doctors (n=4) and nurses (n=8) were the study participants. A thematic analysis of qualitative data was performed. Quantitative data collected from time on task measurements were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Three themes that represent how grounding manifested during the encounter, what it meant for communication during the encounter, and how it influenced the provider's perception of the patient emerged from the qualitative analysis. The descriptive statistics were important for inferring evidence of efficiency and effectiveness of communication for providers. Overall, encounter and task times averaged slightly faster in almost every instance for the treatment group than that in the control group. Common ground clearly was better in the treatment group, indicating that the idea of designing for the secondary UX to improve provider outcomes has merit.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the notions of common ground, human-computer interaction design, and smartphone technology resulted in a prototype that improved the efficiency and effectiveness of face-to-face collaboration for secondary users. The experimental study is one of the first studies to demonstrate that an investment in the secondary UX for high payoff tasks has value but that not all secondary UXs are meaningful for design. This observation is useful for prioritizing how resources should be applied when considering the secondary UX.

摘要

背景

本研究从二级用户体验(UX)的角度调查以患者为中心的移动健康(mHealth)技术。具体而言,它研究了在患者控制下的个人移动技术如何用于改善患者首次就诊时与医疗服务提供者之间关于其医疗保健的沟通。共同基础,一种关于语言使用的理论,被用作检验互动的理论基础。本研究的一个新颖概念是,它是最早探索特定医疗保健任务的二级用户体验相对意义的实证研究之一。

目的

本研究的目的是调查患者操作的移动健康技术在多大程度上可以被设计用于改善患者与医疗服务提供者在初次面对面接触期间的沟通。

方法

2016年2月至2016年5月在中西部的两个大城市进行了实验研究。使用定制设计的智能手机应用程序原型作为研究治疗手段。实验设计为仅后测对照组,包括视频记录的模拟面对面临床接触,其中一名演员扮演患者。由医生(n = 4)和护士(n = 8)组成的经验丰富的临床医生是研究参与者。对定性数据进行了主题分析。使用描述性统计分析从任务时间测量中收集的定量数据。

结果

定性分析得出了三个主题,分别代表了在接触过程中共同基础是如何体现的、它对接触过程中的沟通意味着什么以及它如何影响医疗服务提供者对患者的看法。描述性统计对于推断医疗服务提供者沟通的效率和有效性证据很重要。总体而言,治疗组在几乎每个实例中的接触时间和任务时间平均比对照组略快。治疗组的共同基础明显更好,表明为二级用户体验进行设计以改善医疗服务提供者结果的想法是有价值的。

结论

将共同基础、人机交互设计和智能手机技术的概念相结合,产生了一个原型,该原型提高了二级用户面对面协作的效率和有效性。该实验研究是最早证明对高回报任务的二级用户体验进行投资具有价值,但并非所有二级用户体验对设计都有意义的研究之一。这一观察结果对于在考虑二级用户体验时如何优先分配资源很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/3a4a53ecb20b/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/5f82462da301/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/ff573b45f8bb/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/db724a528315/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/1cc3638f00e6/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/d40dd8badf4e/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/c6ffcd38ac52/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/3a4a53ecb20b/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/5f82462da301/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/ff573b45f8bb/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/db724a528315/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/1cc3638f00e6/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/d40dd8badf4e/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/c6ffcd38ac52/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b31d/6238098/3a4a53ecb20b/mhealth_v6i11e11131_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Simulated Clinical Encounters Using Patient-Operated mHealth: Experimental Study to Investigate Patient-Provider Communication.使用患者操作的移动健康技术进行模拟临床会诊:调查医患沟通的实验研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 1;6(11):e11131. doi: 10.2196/11131.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Testing Consultation Recordings in a Clinical Setting With the SecondEars Smartphone App: Mixed Methods Implementation Study.在临床环境中使用 SecondEars 智能手机应用测试咨询录音:混合方法实施研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 21;8(1):e15593. doi: 10.2196/15593.
4
Mobile App Prototype in Older Adults for Postfracture Acute Pain Management: User-Centered Design Approach.针对老年人骨折后急性疼痛管理的移动应用程序原型:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Oct 17;5(4):e37772. doi: 10.2196/37772.
5
Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.卫生工作者对使用移动健康技术提供初级卫生保健服务的看法和体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 26;3(3):CD011942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011942.pub2.
6
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
7
Operability, Usefulness, and Task-Technology Fit of an mHealth App for Delivering Primary Health Care Services by Community Health Workers in Underserved Areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan: Qualitative Study.在巴基斯坦和阿富汗服务不足地区,由社区卫生工作者使用移动医疗应用程序提供初级卫生保健服务的可操作性、有用性和任务-技术适配性:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 17;22(9):e18414. doi: 10.2196/18414.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Development of a Smartphone App to Predict and Improve the Rates of Suicidal Ideation Among Transgender Persons (TransLife): Qualitative Study.开发一款智能手机应用程序,预测和改善跨性别者(TransLife)自杀意念的发生率:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 24;23(3):e24023. doi: 10.2196/24023.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Wound Care Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices and Mobile Health Technology Use in the Home Environment: Cross-Sectional Survey of Social Network Users.家庭环境中伤口护理知识、态度和实践以及移动健康技术的使用:社交网络用户的横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 26;8(3):e15678. doi: 10.2196/15678.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review.患者参与住院治疗:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):742-50. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002141. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
2
Defining "patient-centered medicine".定义“以患者为中心的医学”。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):782-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1200070.
3
Understanding active and passive users: the effects of an active user using normal, hard and unreliable technologies on user assessment of trust in technology and co-user.理解主动用户和被动用户:主动用户使用正常、困难和不可靠技术对用户对技术和共同用户信任评估的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2012 Jul;43(4):702-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
4
The Assessment, Monitoring, and Enhancement of Treatment Fidelity In Public Health Clinical Trials.公共卫生临床试验中治疗保真度的评估、监测与提高
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71(s1):S52-S63. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x.
5
Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force.个人健康记录的特征:医学图书馆协会/国家医学图书馆联合电子个人健康记录工作组的调查结果。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jul;98(3):243-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.013.
6
Improving personal health records for patient-centered care.改善个人健康记录,以实现以患者为中心的护理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):192-5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000927.
7
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
8
Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits.健康信息技术与医患互动:门诊基层医疗就诊期间计算机对沟通的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):474-80. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1741. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
9
Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.医疗保健中的定性研究。分析定性数据。
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.