Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Bioenergy and Energy Planning Research Group, EPFL ENAC INTER GR-GN, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4842-50. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
Contrary to the case of the United States where a systematic management of the RD&D on lignocellulosic ethanol prevails, in Europe the research works remain fragmented despite the efforts made by the European Union and in few member states. In most of the European countries, sustainable lignocellulosic resources may not be widely available in the future for bioethanol production due to the possible competition between several potential usages. Thus the actual deployment of the lignocellulosic bioethanol in Europe will depend on the opportunity costs of biomass on one side and on the prices of ethanol and gasoline on the other side. While the papers on lignocellulosic ethanol often emphasize technology progress, this review paper also addresses policy measures. It is found that, especially in Europe where security of oil supply will be lower in long term, the policy instruments should explicitly reward the higher value of lignocellulosic ethanol compared to first the generation ethanol and gasoline.
与美国对木质纤维素乙醇的研发进行系统管理的情况相反,在欧洲,尽管欧盟和少数成员国做出了努力,但研究工作仍然分散。在大多数欧洲国家,由于几种潜在用途之间的竞争,可持续的木质纤维素资源未来可能无法广泛用于生产生物乙醇。因此,木质纤维素生物乙醇在欧洲的实际部署将取决于生物质的机会成本,以及乙醇和汽油的价格。虽然关于木质纤维素乙醇的论文通常强调技术进步,但本文也涉及政策措施。研究发现,特别是在长期石油供应安全较低的欧洲,政策工具应明确奖励木质纤维素乙醇相对于第一代乙醇和汽油的更高价值。