Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Bioenergy and Energy Planning Research Group (EPFL), ENAC INTER GR-GN, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4980-91. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
Lignocellulosic ethanol is expected to be commercialised during the next decade as renewable energy for transport. Competiveness with first generation bioethanol and with gasoline is commonly considered in techno-economic analyses for commercial stage. Several existing reviews conclude about the high spread of current and projected production costs of lignocellulosic ethanol due to the significant differences in assumptions concerning the following factors: composition and cost of feedstock, process design, conversion efficiency, valorisation of co-products, and energy conservation. Focusing on the studies in the United States of America and in Europe, the present review investigates the different natures of the techno-economic evaluations during the development process of the supply chain i.e., standard costing with respect to Value Engineering, and Target Costing based on the projected market price. The paper highlights the significant contribution of feedstock to the lignocellulosic ethanol production cost and the need to consider competition between different uses for resources. It is recommended the use of a value-based approach that considers sustainability characteristics and potential competition for resources complementarily to Target Costing and Value Engineering.
木质纤维素乙醇有望在未来十年内作为可再生能源用于交通领域而实现商业化。在商业阶段的技术经济分析中,通常会考虑与第一代生物乙醇和汽油的竞争力。由于以下因素的假设存在显著差异,现有几项综述的结论都认为木质纤维素乙醇当前和预计的生产成本存在较大的分散性:原料的组成和成本、工艺设计、转化效率、副产物的增值以及能源节约。本综述重点研究了美国和欧洲的研究,调查了供应链开发过程中技术经济评估的不同性质,即价值工程的标准成本核算和基于预计市场价格的目标成本核算。本文强调了原料对木质纤维素乙醇生产成本的重要贡献,以及需要考虑资源的不同用途之间的竞争。建议采用基于价值的方法,该方法考虑可持续性特征和潜在的资源竞争,以补充目标成本核算和价值工程。