Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 24;5(2):e9328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009328.
All genes critical for plasmid replication regulation are located on the plasmid rather than on the host chromosome. It is possible therefore that there can be copy-up "cheater" mutants. In spite of this possibility, low copy number plasmids appear to exist stably in host populations. We examined this paradox using a multilevel selection model. Simulations showed that, a slightly higher copy number mutant could out-compete the wild type. Consequently, another mutant with still higher copy number could invade the first invader. However, the realized benefit of increasing intra-host fitness was saturating whereas that of inter-host fitness was exponential. As a result, above a threshold, intra-host selection was overcompensated by inter-host selection and the low copy number wild type plasmid could back invade a very high copy number plasmid. This led to a rock-paper-scissor (RPS) like situation that allowed the coexistence of plasmids with varied copy numbers. Furthermore, another type of cheater that had lost the genes required for conjugation but could hitchhike on a conjugal plasmid, could further reduce the advantage of copy-up mutants. These sociobiological interactions may compliment molecular mechanisms of replication regulation in stabilizing the copy numbers.
所有对质粒复制调控至关重要的基因都位于质粒上,而不是宿主染色体上。因此,可能存在复制“作弊”突变体。尽管存在这种可能性,但低拷贝数质粒似乎在宿主群体中稳定存在。我们使用多层次选择模型研究了这一悖论。模拟表明,一个稍微高拷贝数的突变体可以胜过野生型。因此,具有更高拷贝数的另一个突变体可以入侵第一个入侵者。然而,增加宿主内适应性的实际收益是饱和的,而宿主间适应性的收益是指数级的。因此,超过一个阈值,宿主内选择被宿主间选择过度补偿,低拷贝数的野生型质粒可以反向入侵非常高拷贝数的质粒。这导致了一种类似于石头剪刀布(RPS)的情况,允许具有不同拷贝数的质粒共存。此外,另一种失去了接合所需基因但可以搭便车在接合质粒上的“作弊”类型,可以进一步降低复制突变体的优势。这些社会生物学相互作用可能补充了复制调控的分子机制,以稳定拷贝数。