Suppr超能文献

ReCap 髋关节表面置换系统的两年随访结果:23 髋的放射学立体测量研究

Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2011 Apr;35(4):497-502. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-0976-x. Epub 2010 Feb 27.

Abstract

There has been renewed interest for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing due to improved design and manufacturing of implants, better materials, and enhanced implant fixation. In contrast to conventional total hip replacements, only a few clinical hip resurfacing trials using radiostereometry (RSA) have been reported, and solely for the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The purpose of this RSA trial was to describe the migration pattern of a new hip resurfacing system (ReCap) within the first two years after primary surgery. Twenty-six patients underwent total hip replacement. The patients were followed-up for up to 24 months and were evaluated with the use of radiostereometric measurements. The prosthesis showed mean translations and rotation close to zero. Maximum translation was seen along the transverse axis in the medial direction (0.13 mm). No statistically significant translation or rotation was seen at two-years follow-up, (t-test, p <0.05, translation or rotation).

摘要

由于植入物设计和制造的改进、更好的材料以及增强的植入物固定,人们对金属对金属髋关节表面置换重新产生了兴趣。与传统的全髋关节置换术相比,只有少数使用放射立体测量术(RSA)的临床髋关节表面置换试验被报道,而且仅针对 Birmingham 髋关节表面置换术。该 RSA 试验的目的是描述初次手术后头两年内新型髋关节表面置换系统(ReCap)的迁移模式。26 例患者接受了全髋关节置换术。患者接受了长达 24 个月的随访,并使用放射立体测量术进行评估。该假体的平均平移和旋转接近零。最大平移发生在内侧的横轴方向(0.13 毫米)。在两年的随访中,没有观察到统计学上显著的平移或旋转(t 检验,p<0.05,平移或旋转)。

相似文献

1
Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips.
Int Orthop. 2011 Apr;35(4):497-502. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-0976-x. Epub 2010 Feb 27.
2
A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Sep;89(9):1140-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18367.
4
Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2257-65. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4860-x. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
5
Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1570.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
6
Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 17;92(16):2663-71. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01715.
7
Clinical and Functional Outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System.
Orthopedics. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(2):e236-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160129-01. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2731-9. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
A two-year radiostereometric follow-up of the first generation Birmingham mid head resection arthroplasty.
Hip Int. 2014 Jul-Aug;24(4):355-62. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000136. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards the First Generation of Biomimetic Fixation for Resurfacing Arthroplasty Endoprostheses.
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;9(2):99. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9020099.
2
Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.
Int Orthop. 2016 Aug;40(8):1607-1614. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2999-9. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review.
Acta Orthop. 2014 Sep;85(5):447-55. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.934187. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
4
Metal release and metal allergy after total hip replacement with resurfacing versus conventional hybrid prosthesis.
Acta Orthop. 2014 Aug;85(4):348-54. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.922730. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
No association between serum metal ions and implant fixation in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
Acta Orthop. 2014 Aug;85(4):355-62. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.922731. Epub 2014 May 21.
6
Metal-on-Metal Bearing: Is This the End of the Line? We Do Not Think So.
HSS J. 2012 Oct;8(3):262-9. doi: 10.1007/s11420-012-9300-1. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
7
Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 13;13:247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-247.

本文引用的文献

1
Notes on the use and interpretation of radiostereometric analysis.
Acta Orthop. 2009 Feb;80(1):124-30. doi: 10.1080/17453670902807474.
2
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of periprosthetic biological reactions.
Acta Orthop. 2008 Dec;79(6):734-47. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016795.
3
Internal fixation after subtrochanteric femoral fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Feb;25(2):334.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
4
Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Nov;90(11):1522-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20068.
5
2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):84-93. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0541-8. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
7
Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus.
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6 Suppl 1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
8
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):637-54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01012.
9
[First experiences with total hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2007 Sep-Oct;72(5):311-7.
10
A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Sep;89(9):1140-3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B9.18367.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验