Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, 622 W 168th St, PH-527D, New York, NY 10032, USA.
JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):849-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.216.
Although hospital mortality has decreased over time in the United States for patients who receive intensive care, little is known about subsequent outcomes for those discharged alive.
To assess 3-year outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries who survive intensive care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A matched, retrospective cohort study was conducted using a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years. A random half of all patients were selected who received intensive care and survived to hospital discharge in 2003 with 3-year follow-up through 2006. From the other half of the sample, 2 matched control groups were generated: hospitalized patients who survived to discharge (hospital controls) and the general population (general controls), individually matched on age, sex, race, and whether they had surgery (for hospital controls).
Three-year mortality after hospital discharge.
There were 35,308 intensive care unit (ICU) patients who survived to hospital discharge. The ICU survivors had a higher 3-year mortality (39.5%; n = 13,950) than hospital controls (34.5%; n = 12,173) (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.07 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.04-1.10]; P < .001) and general controls (14.9%; n = 5266) (AHR, 2.39 [95% CI, 2.31-2.48]; P < .001). The ICU survivors who did not receive mechanical ventilation had minimal increased risk compared with hospital controls (3-year mortality, 38.3% [n = 12,716] vs 34.6% [n=11,470], respectively; AHR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07]). Those receiving mechanical ventilation had substantially increased mortality (57.6% [1234 ICU survivors] vs 32.8% [703 hospital controls]; AHR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.40-1.73]), with risk concentrated in the 6 months after the quarter of hospital discharge (6-month mortality, 30.1% (n = 645) for those receiving mechanical ventilation vs 9.6% (n = 206) for hospital controls; AHR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.90-2.69]). Discharge to a skilled care facility for ICU survivors (33.0%; n = 11,634) and hospital controls (26.4%; n = 9328) also was associated with high 6-month mortality (24.1% for ICU survivors and hospital controls discharged to a skilled care facility vs 7.5% for ICU survivors and hospital controls discharged home; AHR, 2.62 [95% CI, 2.50-2.74]; P < .001 for ICU survivors and hospital controls combined).
There is a large US population of elderly individuals who survived the ICU stay to hospital discharge but who have a high mortality over the subsequent years in excess of that seen in comparable controls. The risk is concentrated early after hospital discharge among those who require mechanical ventilation.
尽管在美国,接受重症监护的患者的医院死亡率随着时间的推移而下降,但对于存活下来并出院的患者的后续结果知之甚少。
评估在重症监护中存活下来的医疗保险受益人的 3 年结局。
设计、地点和患者:使用医疗保险受益人的 5%的样本进行了匹配的回顾性队列研究,年龄大于 65 岁。所有接受重症监护并在 2003 年存活至出院并在 2006 年进行 3 年随访的患者中随机抽取一半。从样本的另一半中,生成了 2 个匹配的对照组:存活至出院的住院患者(医院对照组)和一般人群(一般对照组),分别按年龄、性别、种族和是否接受手术进行匹配(对于医院对照组)。
出院后 3 年的死亡率。
共有 35308 名在重症监护病房(ICU)存活至出院的 ICU 患者。ICU 幸存者的 3 年死亡率(39.5%;n=13950)高于医院对照组(34.5%;n=12173)(调整后的危险比[HR],1.07[95%置信区间{CI},1.04-1.10];P<0.001)和一般对照组(14.9%;n=5266)(HR,2.39[95%CI,2.31-2.48];P<0.001)。与医院对照组相比,未接受机械通气的 ICU 幸存者的风险增加较小(3 年死亡率,38.3%[n=12716]与 34.6%[n=11470],分别;HR,1.04[95%CI,1.02-1.07])。接受机械通气的患者死亡率显著增加(57.6%[1234 名 ICU 幸存者]与 32.8%[703 名医院对照组];HR,1.56[95%CI,1.40-1.73]),风险集中在出院后季度的 6 个月内(接受机械通气的患者 6 个月死亡率为 30.1%(n=645),而医院对照组为 9.6%(n=206);HR,2.26[95%CI,1.90-2.69])。对于 ICU 幸存者(33.0%;n=11634)和医院对照组(26.4%;n=9328)出院至康复护理机构的患者,6 个月死亡率也很高(ICU 幸存者和医院对照组出院至康复护理机构的患者为 24.1%,而 ICU 幸存者和医院对照组出院回家的患者为 7.5%;HR,2.62[95%CI,2.50-2.74];P<0.001,ICU 幸存者和医院对照组合计)。
在美国有大量的老年患者在 ICU 住院期间存活下来并出院,但随后几年的死亡率很高,超过了可比对照组的死亡率。风险集中在出院后早期,需要机械通气的患者风险更高。