• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Safety of Discharging Select Patients Directly Home From the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Population-Based Cohort Study.从重症监护病房直接出院的选择性患者安全性评估:一项多中心基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1390-1399. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3675.
2
Survival and Safety Outcomes of ICU Patients Discharged Directly Home-A Direct From ICU Sent Home Study.ICU 患者直接出院的生存和安全结局-直接从 ICU 出院回家研究。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):900-906. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003074.
3
Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence, Risk Factors, Resource Use, and Outcomes. A Retrospective Cohort Study.再入院至重症监护病房:发生率、危险因素、资源利用和结局。一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1312-1319. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201611-851OC.
4
Decline in functional status after intensive care unit discharge is associated with ICU readmission: a prospective cohort study.重症监护病房出院后功能状态下降与 ICU 再入院相关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Physiotherapy. 2019 Sep;105(3):321-327. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Long-term outcomes and healthcare utilization following critical illness--a population-based study.危重症后的长期结局与医疗保健利用——一项基于人群的研究。
Crit Care. 2016 Mar 31;20:76. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1248-y.
6
Three-year outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries who survive intensive care.接受重症监护治疗的 Medicare 受益人的三年预后。
JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):849-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.216.
7
Outcomes of ICU Patients With a Discharge Diagnosis of Critical Illness Polyneuromyopathy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.出院诊断为危重病性多神经病性肌病的重症监护病房患者的结局:一项倾向匹配分析。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):2055-2060. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002763.
8
Care Setting Intensity and Outcomes After Emergency Department Presentation Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure.急性心力衰竭患者急诊科就诊后的护理强度与结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 22;5(7):e003232. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003232.
9
Readmission and hospital mortality after ICU discharge of critically ill cancer patients.危重症癌症患者 ICU 出院后的再入院和住院死亡率。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):e0211240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211240. eCollection 2019.
10
Long-term Safety of Directly Discharging Patients Home from the ICU Compared to Ward Transfer.直接将患者从 ICU 出院回家与病房转科相比的长期安全性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Oct;37(10):1344-1352. doi: 10.1177/08850666221090459. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous tracheostomy procedures and patient results in a tertiary intensive care unit: A single-center experience.三级重症监护病房中的经皮气管切开术操作及患者结果:单中心经验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41472. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041472.
2
Discharge from the intensive care unit: Straight home or go to ward? A comparison of their admission and discharge characteristics.从重症监护病房出院:直接回家还是转至普通病房?二者入院及出院特征比较
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Sep 10;25(4):413-415. doi: 10.1177/17511437241281171. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Strategies for adapting under pressure: an interview study in intensive care units.压力下的适应策略:重症监护病房的一项访谈研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jan 28;34(2):81-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017385.
4
Discharging patients home from the intensive care unit: A new trend.将重症监护病房的患者送回家:一种新趋势。
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Aug 16;12(23):5313-5319. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i23.5313.
5
Critical illness among patients experiencing homelessness: a retrospective cohort study.患有 homelessness 的患者的危重病:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Dec 6;27(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04753-7.
6
Ethical considerations in evaluating discharge readiness from the intensive care unit.评估重症监护病房出院准备情况的伦理考虑。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Aug;31(5):896-906. doi: 10.1177/09697330231212338. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
7
Direct Discharge from the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit: Results from a Longitudinal Assessment.重症监护复苏单元的直接出院:一项纵向评估的结果
Crit Care Res Pract. 2023 Oct 30;2023:2213185. doi: 10.1155/2023/2213185. eCollection 2023.
8
Impacts of antipsychotic medication prescribing practices in critically ill adult patients on health resource utilization and new psychoactive medication prescriptions.抗精神病药物在重症成年患者中的处方实践对卫生资源利用和新精神活性药物处方的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287929. eCollection 2023.
9
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Discharged Directly Home From the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.直接从儿科重症监护病房出院的患者的特征和结局。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Aug;38(8):737-742. doi: 10.1177/08850666231162530. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
10
Co-development of a transitions in care bundle for patient transitions from the intensive care unit: a mixed-methods analysis of a stakeholder consensus meeting.共同制定一项从重症监护病房出院患者过渡期护理包:一项利益攸关方共识会议的混合方法分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 2;22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07392-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient, family and provider experiences with transfers from intensive care unit to hospital ward: a multicentre qualitative study.患者、家属和医护人员在重症监护病房转至普通病房过程中的体验:一项多中心定性研究。
CMAJ. 2018 Jun 4;190(22):E669-E676. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170588.
2
Patient, Family, and Physician Satisfaction With Planning for Direct Discharge to Home From Intensive Care Units: Direct From ICU Sent Home Study.患者、家属和医生对直接从重症监护病房出院到家庭的计划的满意度:直接从 ICU 回家研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):82-90. doi: 10.1177/0885066617731263. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
A multi-center prospective cohort study of patient transfers from the intensive care unit to the hospital ward.多中心前瞻性队列研究:患者从重症监护病房转至医院病房。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1485-1494. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4910-1. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
4
The ABCDEF Bundle: Science and Philosophy of How ICU Liberation Serves Patients and Families.ABCDEF集束化护理:重症监护病房解放服务患者及家属的科学与理念
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):321-330. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002175.
5
Readmission Rates After Passage of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: A Pre-Post Analysis.医院再入院率降低计划通过后的再入院率:一项前后分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 7;166(5):324-331. doi: 10.7326/M16-0185. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
6
Factors Associated With the Increasing Rates of Discharges Directly Home From Intensive Care Units-A Direct From ICU Sent Home Study.与重症监护病房直接出院回家率上升相关的因素——一项重症监护病房直接出院回家研究
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Feb;33(2):121-127. doi: 10.1177/0885066616668483. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
7
Healthcare Provider Perceptions of Causes and Consequences of ICU Capacity Strain in a Large Publicly Funded Integrated Health Region: A Qualitative Study.大型公共资助综合健康区域内医疗服务提供者对重症监护病房容量紧张的原因及后果的看法:一项定性研究
Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e347-e356. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002093.
8
The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.医院再入院减少计划
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):494. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1606658.
9
ICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Guidelines: A Framework to Enhance Clinical Operations, Development of Institutional Policies, and Further Research.重症监护病房入院、出院和分诊指南:增强临床运营、制定机构政策和开展进一步研究的框架。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1553-602. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001856.
10
Discharge planning from hospital.医院出院计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 27;2016(1):CD000313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000313.pub5.

从重症监护病房直接出院的选择性患者安全性评估:一项多中心基于人群的队列研究。

Assessment of the Safety of Discharging Select Patients Directly Home From the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Population-Based Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1390-1399. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3675.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3675
PMID:30128550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6584269/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The safety of discharging adult patients recovering from critical illness directly home from the intensive care unit (ICU) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the health care utilization and clinical outcomes for ICU patients discharged directly home from the ICU with those of patients discharged home via the hospital ward.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective population-based cohort study of adult patients admitted to the ICU of 9 medical-surgical hospitals from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2016, with 1-year follow-up after hospital discharge. All adult ICU patients were discharged home alive from hospital, and the propensity score matched cohort (1:1) was based on patient characteristics, therapies received in the ICU, and hospital characteristics.

EXPOSURES

Patient disposition on discharge from the ICU: directly home vs home via the hospital ward.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was readmission to the hospital within 30 days of hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes were emergency department visit within 30 days and death within 1 year.

RESULTS

Among the 6732 patients included in the study, 2826 (42%) were female; median age, 56 years (interquartile range, 41-67 years); 922 (14%) were discharged directly home, with significant variation found between hospitals (range, 4.4%-44.0%). Compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward, patients discharged directly home were younger (median age 47 vs 57 years; P < .001), more likely to be admitted with a diagnosis of overdose, substance withdrawal, seizures, or metabolic coma (32% [295] vs 10% [594]; P < .001), to have a lower severity of acute illness on ICU admission (median APACHE II score 15 vs 18; P < .001), and receive less than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation (42% [389] vs 34% [1984]; P < .001). In the propensity score matched cohort (n = 1632), patients discharged directly home had similar length of ICU stay (median, 3.1 days vs 3.0 days; P = .42) but significantly shorter length of hospital stay (median, 3.3 days vs 9.2 days; P < .001) compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward. There were no significant differences between patients discharged directly home or home via the hospital ward for readmission to the hospital (10% [n = 81] vs 11% [n = 92]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.64-1.20) or emergency department visit (25% [n = 200] vs 26% [n = 212]; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.09) within 30 days of hospital discharge. Four percent of patients in both groups died within 1 year of hospital discharge (n = 31 and n = 34 in the discharged directly home and discharged home via the hospital ward groups, respectively) (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.60-1.35).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The discharge of select adult patients directly home from the ICU is common, and it is not associated with increased health care utilization or increased mortality.

摘要

重要性

从重症监护病房(ICU)直接出院回家的成年患者康复安全性尚不清楚。

目的

比较直接从 ICU 出院回家的 ICU 患者与通过医院病房出院回家的患者的医疗保健利用和临床结局。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性基于人群的队列研究,纳入了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 1 月 1 日期间入住 9 家医疗外科医院 ICU 的成年患者,出院后进行为期 1 年的随访。所有 ICU 患者均从医院活着出院回家,基于患者特征、在 ICU 接受的治疗和医院特征的倾向评分匹配队列(1:1)。

暴露

从 ICU 出院时的患者处置:直接回家与通过医院病房回家。

主要结局和测量

主要结局是出院后 30 天内再次入院。次要结局是出院后 30 天内的急诊就诊和 1 年内的死亡。

结果

在研究纳入的 6732 名患者中,有 2826 名(42%)为女性;中位年龄为 56 岁(四分位距,41-67 岁);922 名(14%)直接出院回家,不同医院之间存在显著差异(范围,4.4%-44.0%)。与通过医院病房出院回家的患者相比,直接出院回家的患者年龄更小(中位年龄 47 岁 vs 57 岁;P < .001),更可能因药物过量、物质戒断、癫痫发作或代谢性昏迷而入院(32%[295] vs 10%[594];P < .001),入院时急性疾病严重程度更低(中位急性生理和慢性健康评分 II 为 15 分 vs 18 分;P < .001),接受的侵入性机械通气时间不足 48 小时(42%[389] vs 34%[1984];P < .001)。在倾向评分匹配队列(n = 1632)中,直接出院回家的患者 ICU 住院时间相似(中位数,3.1 天 vs 3.0 天;P = .42),但医院住院时间明显更短(中位数,3.3 天 vs 9.2 天;P < .001)与通过医院病房出院回家的患者相比。直接出院回家或通过医院病房出院回家的患者在出院后 30 天内再次入院(10%[n = 81] vs 11%[n = 92];危险比[HR],0.88;95%CI,0.64-1.20)或急诊就诊(25%[n = 200] vs 26%[n = 212];HR,0.94;95%CI,0.81-1.09)的差异无统计学意义。出院后 1 年内,两组各有 4%的患者死亡(n = 31 和 n = 34 分别为直接出院回家组和通过医院病房出院回家组)(HR,0.90;95%CI,0.60-1.35)。

结论和相关性

从 ICU 直接出院回家的成年患者选择是常见的,与增加的医疗保健利用或增加的死亡率无关。