• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是可行的:80 例初步经验。

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2241-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0943-z. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-0943-z
PMID:20198490
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new advance wherein laparoscopic surgery is carried out through a single small incision hidden in the umbilicus. Advantages of this technique over standard laparoscopy are still under investigation. The objective of this study is to describe the short-term outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in a single community-based institution.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database for all patients who underwent SILS cholecystectomy was carried out. Both true single-incision and dual-incision (training) cases were included in the analysis. Operative and perioperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty SILS cholecystectomies (4 dual incision and 76 single incision) were performed from May 30, 2008 to April 23, 2009 (indications: 48 stones, 20 cholecystitis, 11 biliary dyskinesia, and 1 polyp). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.5 kg/m(2) (range 17.3-39.1 kg/m(2)), mean operating room (OR) time was 69.5 min (range 29-126 min), mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 5 cc, and mean incision length was 1.6 cm. There were no open conversions, but there were six conversions to dual-port and three conversions to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor visualization. Complications include three bile leaks managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous drainage (3.7%). Two leaks were from accessory ducts and one was from a cystic duct stump. Number of days of postoperative oral narcotic use was described as none in 11 patients (23%), minimal (1 day) in 21 patients (45%), moderate (1-3 days) in 6 patients (13%), and heavy (≥ 4 days) in 9 patients (19%), with mean follow-up of 4.7 months in 60 patients.

CONCLUSION

SILS cholecystectomy is feasible, with acceptable morbidity. Although not directly compared in this study, postoperative recovery appears shorter than after standard laparoscopy, but more studies are needed.

摘要

背景与目的

单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)是一种新的进展,通过隐藏在脐部的单个小切口进行腹腔镜手术。该技术相对于标准腹腔镜的优势仍在研究中。本研究的目的是描述单一社区机构中 SILS 胆囊切除术的短期结果。

方法

对所有接受 SILS 胆囊切除术的患者进行前瞻性收集数据库的回顾性分析。包括真正的单切口和双切口(培训)病例。分析手术和围手术期结果。

结果

2008 年 5 月 30 日至 2009 年 4 月 23 日,共进行了 80 例 SILS 胆囊切除术(4 例双切口和 76 例单切口)(适应证:48 例结石,20 例胆囊炎,11 例胆动障碍,1 例息肉)。平均体重指数(BMI)为 26.5kg/m²(范围 17.3-39.1kg/m²),平均手术室(OR)时间为 69.5 分钟(范围 29-126 分钟),平均估计失血量(EBL)为 5cc,平均切口长度为 1.6cm。没有开放转换,但由于可视化效果不佳,有 6 例转为双端口和 3 例转为四端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术。并发症包括 3 例胆漏,经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)和经皮引流(3.7%)处理。2 例漏出物来自副胆管,1 例来自胆囊管残端。术后口服麻醉药的天数描述为 11 例(23%)无,21 例(45%)最少(1 天),6 例(13%)中度(1-3 天),9 例(19%)重度(≥4 天),60 例患者的平均随访时间为 4.7 个月。

结论

SILS 胆囊切除术是可行的,发病率可接受。虽然在本研究中没有直接比较,但术后恢复似乎比标准腹腔镜短,但还需要更多的研究。

相似文献

1
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是可行的:80 例初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2241-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0943-z. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration via the umbilical port.经脐部单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合术中常规胆道造影及胆总管探查术。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):1122-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2009-2. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
3
The role of ERCP in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后患者中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Sep;89(9):1523-7.
4
Cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery with a new SILS port.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术新装置(SILS port)的应用。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010 Sep;17(5):688-91. doi: 10.1007/s00534-010-0266-4. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
5
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center experience.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:单中心经验。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(5):410-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
6
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
Single incision laparoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: a preliminary experience.单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:初步经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010 Jun;20(3):e89-91. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181dbfe24.
8
Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果:传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children with sickle cell anemia and the role of ERCP.镰状细胞贫血患儿的腹腔镜胆囊切除术及内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的作用
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Apr;22(2):139-42. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182471b1c.
10
Endoscopic management of postoperative bile leaks.术后胆漏的内镜治疗
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2006 May;5(2):273-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Single-Incision Cholecystectomy and Multiple-Incision Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Complications.单孔胆囊切除术与多孔胆囊切除术的比较:术后并发症的系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 3;17(2):e78434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78434. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced postoperative pain than three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with large gallstone, a retrospective study.一项回顾性研究表明,对于患有大结石的患者,单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术比三切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛减轻。
Front Surg. 2024 Dec 5;11:1448684. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1448684. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的单孔入路。
Surg Endosc. 2009 May;23(5):1138-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0389-3. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
2
Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种完全经脐入路的手术方式。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Apr;19(2):219-22. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0275.
3
Cystic duct stump leaks: after the learning curve.胆囊管残端漏:度过学习曲线之后
A retrospective cohort report of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomies in Saudi Arabia: Postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction.
沙特阿拉伯单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性队列报告:术后结果与患者满意度
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul 31;81:104245. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104245. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Solo single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the parallel method; Surgical technique reducing a steep learning curve.采用平行法的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术;降低陡峭学习曲线的手术技术。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2019 Nov;23(4):344-352. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.4.344. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
5
A large-cohort comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a single center; 2080 cases.单中心2080例单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的大样本队列比较
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 Nov;22(4):367-373. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.4.367. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
Evolution of the Konyang Standard Method for single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the result from a thousand case of a single center experience.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的昆阳标准方法的演变:来自单中心一千例病例的经验结果。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Aug;95(2):80-86. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.2.80. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
7
Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial).多端口与单端口胆囊切除术:一项多中心随机对照试验(MUSIC试验)的结果
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2872-2880. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5298-7. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
8
Risk factors for conversion to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转为传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的危险因素。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Jun;90(6):303-8. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.6.303. Epub 2016 May 30.
9
Randomized Trial of Immediate Postoperative Pain Following Single-incision Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术后即刻疼痛的随机试验
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Dec 20;128(24):3310-6. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.171422.
10
Quality and safety of minimally invasive surgery: past, present, and future.微创手术的质量与安全:过去、现在与未来。
Biomed Eng Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 21;6:1-11. doi: 10.4137/BECB.S10967. eCollection 2014.
Arch Surg. 2008 Dec;143(12):1178-83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.12.1178.
4
One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the "critical view of safety" technique.在一个手术单元中采用“安全关键视野”技术进行的一千例腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Mar;13(3):498-503. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0748-8. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
5
Postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy bile leak secondary to an accessory duct of Luschka.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后因卢氏副管导致的胆漏
JSLS. 2005 Apr-Jun;9(2):216-7.
6
Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus.经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术在脐部以外不做切口。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999 Aug;9(4):361-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.361.
7
Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.选择性经脐与标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Eur J Surg. 1999 Jan;165(1):29-34. doi: 10.1080/110241599750007478.