Suppr超能文献

手机心肺复苏术:在需要时由非专业施救者使用的音频指导:一项随机对照试验。

Cell phone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: audio instructions when needed by lay rescuers: a randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;55(6):538-543.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.020. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Given the ubiquitous presence of cellular telephones, we seek to evaluate the extent to which prerecorded audio cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions delivered by a cell telephone will improve the quality of CPR provided by untrained and trained lay rescuers.

METHODS

We randomly assigned both previously CPR trained and untrained volunteers to perform CPR on a manikin for 3 minutes with or without audio assistance from a cell telephone programmed to provide CPR instructions. We measured CPR quality metrics-pauses (ie, no flow time), compression rate (minute), depth (millimeters), and hand placement (percentage correct)-across the 4 groups defined by being either CPR trained or untrained and receiving or not receiving cell telephone CPR instructions.

RESULTS

There was no difference in CPR measures for participants who had or had not received previous CPR training. Participants using the cell telephone aid performed better compression rate (100/minute [95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 103/minute] versus 44/minute [95% CI 38 to 50/minute]), compression depth (41 mm [95% CI 38 to 44 mm] versus 31 mm [95% CI 28 to 34 mm]), hand placement (97% [95% CI 94% to 100%] versus 75% [95% CI 68% to 83%] correct), and fewer pauses (74 seconds [95% CI 72 to 76 seconds] versus 89 seconds [95% CI 80 to 98 seconds]) compared with participants without the cell telephone aid.

CONCLUSION

A simple audio program that can be made available for cell telephones increases the quality of bystander CPR in a manikin simulation.

摘要

研究目的

鉴于手机无处不在,我们试图评估通过手机播放预先录制的心肺复苏(CPR)音频指导对未经培训和受过培训的非专业施救者提供的 CPR 质量的影响。

方法

我们随机分配了之前接受过 CPR 培训和未经培训的志愿者,让他们在模拟人身上进行 3 分钟的 CPR,其中一些志愿者会通过手机获得音频指导,而另一些志愿者则没有。我们测量了 4 组志愿者的 CPR 质量指标——暂停时间(即无血流时间)、按压频率(每分钟)、按压深度(毫米)和手的位置(正确百分比),这些志愿者的分组依据是他们是否接受过 CPR 培训以及是否收到过手机 CPR 指导。

结果

对于接受或未接受过之前 CPR 培训的参与者,CPR 措施没有差异。使用手机辅助工具的参与者的按压频率(100 次/分钟[95%置信区间(CI)97 至 103 次/分钟]比 44 次/分钟[95%CI 38 至 50 次/分钟])、按压深度(41 毫米[95%CI 38 至 44 毫米]比 31 毫米[95%CI 28 至 34 毫米])、手的位置(97%[95%CI 94%至 100%]比 75%[95%CI 68%至 83%]正确)和暂停时间(74 秒[95%CI 72 至 76 秒]比 89 秒[95%CI 80 至 98 秒])都更少。

结论

一个简单的音频程序,可通过手机提供,可提高模拟人场景中旁观者 CPR 的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验