Suppr超能文献

平行弥散加权成像和表观扩散系数(ADC)图值在评价乳腺病变中的作用:初步结果。

The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China 100053.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr;17(4):456-63. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.004.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with an array spatial sensitivity encoding technique (ASSET) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values with different b values to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-six female patients with 60 histologically proven breast lesions and 20 healthy volunteers underwent magnetic resonance imaging. A subset of normal volunteers (n = 7) and patients (n = 16) underwent both conventional DWI and ASSET-DWI, and the image quality between the two methods was compared. Finally, ASSET-DWI with b = 0, 600 s/mm(2), and b = 0, 1000 s/mm(2), were compared for their ability to distinguish benign and malignant breast lesions.

RESULTS

The ASSET-DWI method had less distortion, fewer artifacts, and a lower acquisition time than other methods. No significant difference (P > .05) was detected in ADC map values between ASSET-DWI and conventional DWI. For ASSET-DWI, the sensitivity of ADC values for malignant lesions with a threshold of less than 1.44 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (b = 600 s/mm(2)) and 1.18 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (b = 1000 s/mm(2)) was 80% and 77.5%, respectively. The specificity of both groups was 95%.

CONCLUSION

ASSET-DWI evaluation of breast tissue offers decreased distortion, susceptibility to artifacts, and acquisition time relative to other methods. The use of ASSET-DWI is feasible with b values ranging from 600 to 1000 s/mm(2) and provides increased specificity compared to other techniques. Thus, the ADC value of a breast lesion can be used to further characterize malignant lesions from benign ones.

摘要

背景和目的

评估使用扩散加权成像(DWI)和不同 b 值的表观扩散系数(ADC)图值的阵列空间灵敏度编码技术(ASSET)来区分良性和恶性乳腺病变的可行性。

材料和方法

56 名女性患者,共 60 个经组织学证实的乳腺病变和 20 名健康志愿者接受了磁共振成像检查。一部分正常志愿者(n=7)和患者(n=16)同时接受了常规 DWI 和 ASSET-DWI,比较了两种方法的图像质量。最后,比较了 ASSET-DWI 中 b 值为 0、600 s/mm²和 b 值为 0、1000 s/mm² 对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别能力。

结果

ASSET-DWI 方法的失真度更小、伪影更少、采集时间更短。ASSET-DWI 的 ADC 值与常规 DWI 之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。对于 ASSET-DWI,阈值小于 1.44×10⁻³mm²/s(b=600 s/mm²)和 1.18×10⁻³mm²/s(b=1000 s/mm²)时,恶性病变 ADC 值的灵敏度分别为 80%和 77.5%,特异性均为 95%。

结论

与其他方法相比,ASSET-DWI 对乳腺组织的评估具有更小的失真度、对伪影的敏感性和更短的采集时间。ASSET-DWI 可以使用 600 到 1000 s/mm² 的 b 值,与其他技术相比,特异性更高。因此,乳腺病变的 ADC 值可用于进一步区分良恶性病变。

相似文献

2
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e782-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4(1):35-42. doi: 10.2463/mrms.4.35.
6
Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1030-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2522.
7
Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(6):1656-65. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24929. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
9
Breast DWI at 3 T: influence of the fat-suppression technique on image quality and diagnostic performance.
Clin Radiol. 2015 Mar;70(3):286-94. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
10

引用本文的文献

3
Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2020 May 6;15(5):e0232856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232856. eCollection 2020.
4
Invasive ductal breast cancer: preoperative predict Ki-67 index based on radiomics of ADC maps.
Radiol Med. 2020 Feb;125(2):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01100-1. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
9
Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience.
Radiol Med. 2015 Aug;120(8):705-13. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0508-2. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2008;7(1):23-9. doi: 10.2463/mrms.7.23.
3
Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity.
Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):848-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452061535. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
4
5
Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005 Nov-Dec;29(6):834-41. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000181722.84844.9c.
7
Imaging in breast cancer: magnetic resonance imaging.
Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(5):215-9. doi: 10.1186/bcr1309. Epub 2005 Aug 5.
9
ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4(1):35-42. doi: 10.2463/mrms.4.35.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验