Suppr超能文献

北欧维持护理计划——腰痛患者治疗间隔:间隔多近以及由谁来决定?

The Nordic maintenance care program--time intervals between treatments of patients with low back pain: how close and who decides?

作者信息

Sandnes Kjerstin F, Bjørnstad Charlotte, Leboeuf-Yde Charlotte, Hestbaek Lise

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Chiropr Osteopat. 2010 Mar 8;18:5. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of chiropractic patients with acute and chronic/persistent conditions probably differs. However, little is known on this subject. There is, for example, a dearth of information on maintenance care (MC). Thus it is not known if patients on MC are coerced to partake in a program of frequent treatments over a long period of time, or if they are actively involved in designing their own individualized treatment program.

OBJECTIVES

It was the purpose of this study to investigate how chiropractic patients with low back pain were scheduled for treatment, with special emphasis on MC. The specific research questions were: 1. How many patients are on maintenance care? 2) Are there specific patterns of intervals between treatments for patients and, if so, do they differ between MC patients and non-MC patients? 3. Who decides on the next treatment, the patient, the chiropractor or both, and are there any differences between MC patients and non-MC patients?

METHODS

Chiropractic students, who during their summer holidays were observers in chiropractic clinics in Norway and Denmark, recorded whether patients were classified by the treating chiropractor as a MC-patient or not, dates for last and subsequent visits, and made a judgement on whether the patient or the chiropractor decided on the next appointment.

RESULTS

Observers in the study were 16 out of 30 available students. They collected data on 868 patients from 15 Danish and 13 Norwegian chiropractors. Twenty-two percent and 26%, respectively, were classified as MC patients. Non-MC patients were most frequently seen within 1 week. For MC patients, the previous visit was most often 2-4 weeks prior to the actual visit, and the next appointment between 1 and 3 months. This indicates a gradual increase in intervals. The decision of the next visit was mainly made by the chiropractor, also for MC patients. However, the study samples of chiropractors appear not to be representative of the general Danish and Norwegian chiropractic profession and the patients may also have been non-representative.

CONCLUSION

There were two distinctly different patterns for the time period between visits for MC patients and non-MC patients. For non-MC patients, the most frequent interval between visits was one week and for MC patients, the period was typically between two weeks and three months. It was primarily the chiropractor who made the next visit-decision. However, these results can perhaps not be extrapolated to other groups of patients and chiropractors.

摘要

背景

脊椎按摩疗法对急性和慢性/持续性疾病患者的治疗方式可能有所不同。然而,关于这一主题的了解却很少。例如,关于维持性护理(MC)的信息匮乏。因此,尚不清楚接受维持性护理的患者是被迫长期参与频繁治疗计划,还是积极参与设计自己的个性化治疗方案。

目的

本研究旨在调查腰痛的脊椎按摩疗法患者的治疗安排情况,特别关注维持性护理。具体研究问题如下:1. 有多少患者接受维持性护理?2. 患者治疗间隔是否存在特定模式?如果存在,维持性护理患者和非维持性护理患者之间是否存在差异?3. 由谁决定下次治疗,是患者、脊椎按摩师还是双方共同决定?维持性护理患者和非维持性护理患者之间是否存在差异?

方法

脊椎按摩疗法专业的学生在暑假期间作为观察员在挪威和丹麦的脊椎按摩诊所工作,记录治疗脊椎按摩师是否将患者归类为维持性护理患者、上次和后续就诊日期,并判断是患者还是脊椎按摩师决定下次预约。

结果

该研究中的观察员为30名可用学生中的16名。他们收集了来自15名丹麦和13名挪威脊椎按摩师的868名患者的数据。分别有22%和26%的患者被归类为维持性护理患者。非维持性护理患者最常在1周内就诊。对于维持性护理患者,上次就诊时间通常在实际就诊前2至4周,下次预约时间在1至3个月之间。这表明间隔时间逐渐增加。下次就诊的决定主要由脊椎按摩师做出,维持性护理患者也是如此。然而,参与研究的脊椎按摩师样本似乎不能代表丹麦和挪威的整个脊椎按摩疗法行业,患者可能也不具有代表性。

结论

维持性护理患者和非维持性护理患者的就诊间隔时间存在两种明显不同的模式。对于非维持性护理患者,最常见的就诊间隔是1周,而对于维持性护理患者,这个时间段通常在2周和3个月之间。下次就诊的决定主要由脊椎按摩师做出。然而,这些结果可能无法推广到其他患者群体和脊椎按摩师。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验